• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/58

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

58 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Self-concept

how we think and feel about who we are. Self esteem is included in this.

Ought-self

about societal expectations

self-schema

perceptions about self, influence actions

physical self description

i am female, blond, etc

social self description

i am a sister, an american, soccer player, etc

psychological self description

i am thoughtful, i am tired, etc

holistic self description

i am human, alive, etc

spontaneous self concept

can change based on situation

relational trait

i am a sister, a friend

membership trait

i am an american, on the soccer team

executive function of the self

self control, ability to reason, puzzle, self regulate (study because you see yourself as a good student- trying to stay consistent with self concept)

the self regulatory resource

suggests that our self control is a limited resource. resource pool does not stay dry forever once depleted, it's like a muscle. if you use it enough it gets too tired to be used. after a rest period you can use it again, and it will be stronger.

self awareness

the act of thinking about yourself. required to have self concept. not developed at birth, fully developed around age two.

rouge test

put blush or something on the baby's face, put them in front of a mirror. if they touch their face, they're self aware.

introspection

active process of looking inward and examining your thoughts, feelings and emotions. (self awareness theory) requires self awareness and increases it

faults of introspection

we don't engage in it often, or at least as much as we think we do. we are often unaware of the reasons for our feelings and behaviors.


reasons-generated attitude change model

analyzing the reasons for our preferences for things can change our feelings about them

reflected appraisals

our perception of how other people are viewing and reacting to us

self-presentation

the attempt to get a specific reaction from someone

self-monitoring

using reactions to change yourself or your behavior

observations of behavior

observing how we react to gauge how we feel

self-perception theory

inferring our attitudes and feelings based on observations of our behavior

two facter theory of emotion

to some extent, we learn about our emotions by observing our behavior. Two steps, 1 is feel something

misattribution of arousal

maybe you assume you're afraid, but really you're excited.

Social comparison theory

we learn about our attitudes and behaviors through comparison with other people.

upward social comparison

comparing yourself to someone who is better than you, encourages you to improve

downward social comparison

comparing yourself to someone that is worse, makes you feel better about yourself

social identity theory

more about group membership. Self esteem is important, part of our identity comes from the groups to which we belong, can boost self esteem by comparing your group to other groups

BIRGing

basking in reflected glory. emphasizes ties with successful groups.

optimal distintiveness theory

suggests that our social identity comes not only from needing to identify with groups, but also from a need for uniqueness.

cognitive dissonance

psychological discomfort that you experience when there is a discrepancy between cognitions and behavior or between cognitions themselves

three ways to deal with it

1 change the behavior


2 change your view of yourself


3 adding a consonant cognition- "but not that much", "but it's the truth"

external justification

explanation for counterattitudinal behavior that lies outside the individual (money)

insufficient justification

the justification isn't enough, but you continue to engage in counterattitudinal behavior

internal justification

changing one's attitude and beliefs to avoid dissonance

forced compliance paradigm

we "force" someone to do something and they comply, but they don't really want to do it or it doesn't agree with their beliefs. Offer very little incentive. causes CD. They often engage in internal justification.

effort justification

tendency to increase our liking for something that we have worked hard to attain

hyprocrisy induction

the arousal of dissonance by having individuals make statements that run counter to their behaviors and then reminding them of the inconsistency between what they advocated and their behavior. the purpose is to lead individuals to more responsible behavior.

attitudes

evaluations of people, objects, and ideas

cognitively based attitude

an attitude based primarily an people's beliefs about the properties of an attitude object

affectively based attitude

an attitude based more on people's feelings and values than on their beliefs about the nature of an attitude object

yale attitude change approach

the study of the conditions under which people are most likely to change their attitudes in response to persuasive messages, focusing on the source of the communication, the nature of the communication, and the nature of the audience.

elaboration likelihood model

a model explaining two ways in which a persuasive communications can cause attitude change: centrally, when people are motivated and have the ability to pay attention the arguements in the communication, and peripherally, when people do not pay attention to the arguments but are instead swayed by the surface characteristics

central route persuasion

the case in which people elaborate on a persuasive communication, listening carefully to and thinking about the arguments which occurs when people have both the ability and motivation to listen carefully to a communication.

peripheral route to persuasion

the case in which people to not elaborate on the arguments in a persuasive communication but are instead swayed by peripheral cues.

need for cognition

a personality variable reflecting the extent to which people engage in and enjoy effortful cognitive activities.

heuristic-systematic model of persuasion

an explanation of the two ways in which persuasive communications can cause attitude change: either systematically processing the merits of the arguments or using mental shortcuts

attitude innoculation

making people immune to attempts to change their attitudes by initially exposing them to small doses of the arguments against their position

conformity

a change in one's behavior due to the real or imagined influence of other people

informational social influence

the influence of other people that leads us to conform because we see them as a source of information to quide our behavior; we conform because we believe that others' interpretation of an ambiguous situation is more correct than ours and will help us choose an appropriate course of action

private acceptance

conforming to other people's behavior out of a genuine belief that what they are doing or saying is right

contagion

the rapid spread of emotions of behaviors through a crowd

mass psychogenic illness

the occurrence in a group of people of similar physical symptoms with no known physical cause

social norms

the implicit or explicit rules a group has for the acceptable behaviors, values, ad beliefs of it's members

idiosyncrasy credits

the tolerance of a person earns, over time, be conforming to group norms; if enough idiosyncrasy credits are earned, the person can, on occasion, behave deviantly without retribution from the group.

minority influence

the case where a minority of group members influences the behavior or beliefs of the majority

injunctive norms

people's perceptions of what behaviors are approved or disapproved of by others

descriptive norms

people's perceptions of how people actually behave in given situations, regardless of whether the behavior is approved or disapproved of by others.