• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/126

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

126 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
social influence
effect that words, actions, or mere presence of other people have on our thoughts, feelings, attitudes, or behavior
social psychology
scientific study of way in which people's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are influenced by the real or imagined presence of other people
construal
the way in which people perceive, comprehend, and interpret the social world
individual differences
aspects of people's personalities that make them different from other people
fundamental attribution error
tendency to overestimate the extent to which people's behavior is due to internal, dispositional factors, and to underestimate the role of situational factors
behaviorism
school of psychology maintaining that to understand human behavior, one need only consider the reinforcing properties of the environment--that is, how positive and negative events in the environment are associated with specific behaviors
gestalt psychology
school of psychology stressing the importance of studying the subjective way in which an object appears in people's minds rather than the objective, physical attributes of the object
self-esteem
people's evaluations of their own self-worth--that is, the extent to which they view themselves as good, competent, and decent
social cognition
how people think about themselves and the social world; more specifically, how people select, interpret, remember, and use social information to make judgments and decisions
hindsight bias
tendency for people to exaggerate how much they could have predicted an outcome after knowing that it occurred
observational method
technique whereby a researcher observes people and systematically records measurements or impressions of their behavior
ethnography
method by which researchers attempt to understand a group or culture by observing it from the inside, without imposing any preconceived notions they might have
interjudge reliability
level of agreement between two or more people who independently observe and code a set of data; by showing that two or more judges independently come up with the same observations, researchers ensure that the observations are not the subjective, distorted impressions of one individual
archival analysis
form of the observational method in which the researcher examines the accumulated documents, or archives, of a culture (novels, diaries, newspapers, etc)
correlational method
technique whereby two or more variables are systematically measured and the relationship between them (i.e., how much one can be predicted from the other) is assessed
correlation coefficient
statistical technique that assesses how well you can predict one variable from another--for example, how well you can predict people's weight from their height
surveys
research in which a representative sample of people are asked (often anonymously) questions about their attitudes or behavior
random selection
way of ensuring that a sample of people is representative of a population by giving everyone in the population an equal chance of being selected for the sample
experimental method
method in which the researcher randomly assigns participants to different conditions and ensures that these conditions are identical except for the independent variable (the one thought to have a causal effect on people's responses)
independent variable
variable a researcher changes or varies to see if it has an effect on some other variable
dependent variable
variable a researcher changes or varies to see if it has an effect on some other variable
random assignment to condition
process ensuring that all participants have an equal chance of taking part in any condition of an experiment; through random assignment, researchers can be relatively certain that differences in the participants' personalities or backgrounds are distributed evenly across conditions
probability level (p-value)
number calculated with statistical techniques that tells researchers how likely it is that the results of their experiment occurred by chance and not because of the independent variable or variables; the convention in science, including social psychology, is to consider results significant (trustworthy) if the probability level is less than 5 in 100 that the results might be due to chance factors and not the independent variables studied
internal validity
making sure that nothing besides the independent variable can affect the dependent variable; this is accomplished by controlling all extraneous variables and by randomly assigning people to different experimental conditions
external validity
extent to which the results of a study can be generalized to other situations and to other people
psychological realism
extent to which the psychological processes triggered in an experiment are similar to psychological processes that occur in everyday life
cover story
description of the purpose of a study, given to participants, that is different from its true purpose, used to maintain psychological realism
field experiments
experiments conducted in natural settings rather than in the laboratory
meta-analysis
statistical technique that averages the results of two or more studies to see if the effect of an independent variable is reliable
basic research
studies that are designed to find the best answer to the question of why people behave as they do and that are conducted purely for reasons of intellectual curiosity
applied research
studies designed to solve a particular social problem
cross cultural research
research conducted with members of different cultures, to see whether the psychological processes of interest are present in both cultures or whether they are specific to the culture in which people were raisedq
natural selection
process by which heritable traits that promote survival in a particular environment are passed along to future generations, because organisms with that trait are more likely to produce offspring
evolutionary psychology
attempt to explain social behavior in terms of genetic factors that evolved over time according to the principles of natural selection
informed consent
agreement to participate in an experiment, granted in full awareness of the nature of the experiment, which has been explained in advance
deception
misleading participants about the true purpose of a study or the events that will actually transpire
institutional review board
group made up of at least one scientist, one nonscientist, and one member not affiliated with the institution that reviews all psychological research at that institution and decides whether it meets ethical guidelines; all research must be approved by the IRB before it is conducted
debriefing
explaining to participants, at the end of an experiment, the true purpose of the study and exactly what transpired
social cognition
how people think about themselves and the social world, or more specifically, how people select, interpret, remember, and use social information to make judgments and decisions
automatic thinking
thinking that is nonconscious, unintentional, involuntary, and effortless
schemas
mental structures people use to organize their knowledge about the social world around themes or subjects and that influence the information people notice, think about, and remember
accessibility
the extent to which schemas and concepts are at the forefront of people's minds and are therefore likely to be used when making judgments about the social world
printing
processes by which recent experiences increase the accessibility of a schema, trait, or concept
self-fulfilling prophecy
the case whereby people have an expectation about what another person is like, which influences how they act toward that person, which causes that person to behave consistently with people's original expectations, making the expectations come true
judgmental heuristics
mental shortcuts people use to make judgments quickly and efficiently
availability heuristic
a mental rule of thumb whereby people base a judgment on the ease with which they can bring something to mind
representativeness heuristic
mental shortcut whereby people classify something according to how similar it is to a typical case
base rate information
information about the frequency of members of different categories in the population
analytical thinking style
type of thinking in which people focus on the properties of objects without considering their surrounding context; this type of thinking is common in western cultures
holistic thinking style
type of thinking in which people focus on the overall context, particularly the ways in which objects relate to each other; this type of thinking is common in East Asian cultures
controlled thinking
thinking that is conscious, intentional, voluntary, and effortful
counterfactual thinking
mentally changing some aspect of the past as a way of imagining what might have been
thought suppression
attempt to avoid thinking about something we would prefer to forget
overconfidence barrier
the fact that people usually have too much confidence in the accuracy of their judgments
social perception
study of how we form impressions of and make inference about other people
nonverbal communication
way in which people communicate, intentionally or unintentionally, without words; nonverbal cues include facial expressions, tone of voice, gestures, body position and movement, the use of touch, and gaze
encode
to express or emit nonverbal behavior, such as smiling or patting someone on the back
decode
interpret the meaning of the nonverbal behavior other people express, such as deciding that a pat on the back was an expression of condescension and not kindness
affect blend
facial expression in which one part of the face registers one emotion while another part of the face registers a different emotion
display rules
culturally determined rules about which nonverbal behaviors are appropriate to display
emblems
nonverbal gestures that have well-understood definitions within a given culture; they usually have direct verbal translations, such as the "OK' sign
implicit personality theory
type of schema people use to group various kinds of personality traits together; for example, many people believe that someone who is kind is generous as well
attribution theory
description of the way in which people explain the causes of their own and other people's behavior
internal attribution
inference that a person is behaving in a certain way because of something about the person, such as attitude, character, or personality
external attribution
inference that a person is behaving a certain way because of something about the situation he or she is in; the assumption is that most people would respond the same way in that situation
covariation model
theory that states that to form an attribution about what caused a person's behavior, we systematically note the pattern between the presence or absence of possible causal factors and whether or not the behavior occurs
consensus information
information about the extent to which other people behave the same way toward the same stimulus as the actor does
distinctiveness information
information about the extent to which one particular actor behaves in the same way to different stimuli
consistency information
information about the extent to which the behavior between one actor and one stimulus is the same across time and circumstances
correspondence bias
the tendency to infer that people's behavior corresponds to (matches) their disposition (personality)
perceptual salience
the seeming importance of information that is the focus of people's attention
two-step process of attribution
analyzing another person's behavior first by making an automatic internal attribution and only then thinking about possible situational reasons for the behavior, after which one may adjust the original internal attribution
actor/observer difference
the tendency to see other people's behavior as dispositionally caused but focusing more on the role of situational factors when explaining one's own behavior
self-serving attributions
explanations for one's successes that credit internal, dispositional factors and explanations for one's failures that blame external, situational factors
defensive attributions
explanations for behavior that avoid feelings of vulnerability and mortality
belief in a just world
a form of defensive attribution wherein people assume that bad things happen to bad people and that good things happen to good people
primacy effect
what you think first, always think
Zombardo study
prisoners and guards, verbal abuse and humiliation, good people do bad things?
cognitive dissonance theory
we like when things in our lives works together--all attitudes and behaviors the same. parsimonious-few assumptions, powerful-explains phenomena, generative-suggests testable hypothesis
theories
offer general explanation, focus on how and why, may or may not be testable
hypotheses
predict outcome of particular study, focus on outcome (what should happen), falsifiable
measurement methods
surveys, self-report, behavioral, observation, physiological measures, neuroscience measures
correlational designs
assess behavior in everyday life, assess behavior that can't be manipulated, first step (show relationship exists)...can't make causal claims NO MANIPULATION
reverse causality problem
x causes y does not mean y causes x
third variable problem
z causes both x and y
experimental designs
independent variable--manipulated by experimenter, hypothesized "cause"
dependent variable--measured by experimenter to determine outcome of interest, hypothesized "effect"
conceptual variable
theoretical variable of interest
operational variable
translates conceptual variables into a form you can measure
random selection
problem: mostly western, college samples
random assignment
equal chance of being in any condition, balances out preexisting differences between groups
experimental control
manipulate only variable of interest, all else held constant

control group--exactly the same except they do not get the experimental treatment
longitudinal designs
same people over time, before and after, change and stability over time, short vs long term effects, combined with experimental conditions, problem--cohort effects
stress
men happier, over time stress has gone up
psychological stress
negative feelings and beliefs that arise when people feel unable to cope with demands of environment--both good and bad things
acute vs chronic
hard exam vs being poor
stress response cycle
phase one: alarm reaction (mobilize resources)
phase two: resistance (cope with stressor)
phase three: exhaustion (reserves depleted)
short term effects of stress
generally adaptive: sugar released in blood, increased heart rate, breathing, blood pressure, immune system, digestion/growth
long term effects of stress
decreased immune function, hypertension, ulcers, diabetes
Cohen, Tyrrell and Smith
cold virus in hotel, more likely to get virus if stressed? problems: stress as independent variable, manipulated? no, didn't assign random stress
perceived control
belief that we can influence our environment in ways that determine whether we experience positive or negative outcomes---confidence, past experience, expectations, socioeconomic status
Rodin and Langer, Schulz and Hanusa
nursing home: plant, speech, movie--those with "perceived control" lived longer
adaptation principle
people adapt to what they have, money does not = happiness
subjective well-being
emotional well-being, satisfaction with life
measure happiness?
observations (smile, laugh), brain activity (dopamine), self report, peer reports,
impact bias
tendency to overestimate the hedonic impact of future events--won't make me happy for as long as i think
schemas
influence is only effective when about something you already believe
social cognition
how we select, interpret, and remember info about others and ourselves--how this influences our judgments and behaviors, construals
schema definition
organized set of knowledge about a stimuli, knowledge includes attributes of stimulus, relations among attributes, and specific examples, mental structure that helps us organize info on a stimulus
types of schemas
stereotypes (types of people or groups of people), personality traits, situations (scripts, cultural), ourselves, objects
characteristics of schemas
have one for almost everything (even things haven't experienced--media), functional--help with organization, fast, unconscious categorizing
effects of schemas
influence attention and memory
schema relevant>schema irrelevant
microwave at party--doesn't have to do with schema of party
schema consistent>schema inconsistent
video of woman doing household chores, one group told librarian, other waitress (Cohen)
accessibility of schemas
?
chronic vs temporary
chronic-something used a lot, (pessimist vs optimist)
temporary-something just happened
self-fulfilling prophecy example
bloomers--teacher gave extra help/attention/work to those told to be bloomers--then did better
ambiguity effect
?
attribution
inferring the causes of our behavior and the behavior of others, functions to predict and control environment, determine responses to events, influence expectations in future
when make attributions?
to explain events that:
are unexpected
are negative
have uncertain causes
Heider
father of attribution theory, people as "naive scientists", two kinds of att--internal and external, not only humans
fundamental attribution error
tendency to make internal attributions for people's behavior even when there is evidence for external causes (correspondence bias)
Castro study
P's read essays supposedly written by another student, 4 conditions: pro or anti Castro, choice or assigned essay, asked P's to estimate author's true attitude toward Castro
explanation for FAE
attribution is two-step process
1) automatic internal attribution
2)adjustments for external factors
subjects asked to explain behaviors while doing something else
always internal more than external
Gang Lu and Thomas McIlvane
coded for # of internal and external attributions, American newspapers always more internal, Chinese less internal
Fish attribution
why moving away from group, Chinese used internal less, external more