Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
34 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
survey research. strengths and limitations
|
- random selection of subjects
- self-report measures strengths - allows description of population - efficient - less costly limitations: -sample v. population (need to make sure sample is actually random) - self-report bias (not always honest and accurate) |
|
experimental research steps
|
- systematically vary an aspect of the situation
- control all others - observe (measure) the effect |
|
variable
|
a characteristic that varies (must have at least 2)
|
|
independent variable
|
- the variable the researcher MANIPULATES
- the CAUSE in the cause-effect relationship |
|
dependent variable
|
- the variable the researcher MEASURES
- the EFFECT in the cause-effect relationship |
|
experimental group v. control group
|
- experimental group= group exposed to the independent variable
- control group= group not exposed to the independent variable |
|
reason for having 2 groups
|
- minimize expectancy effects
- you know only 1 variable influenced the outcome |
|
"expectancy effects"- ways to minimize
|
- when people know theyre being studied so it can affect behavior
- "single blind"- subject doesnt kow theyre being studied/isnt positive theyre being affected - "double-blind"- subject and researcher knows who's being affected |
|
logic of experimentation
|
any effects on the DV must be caused by the IV
|
|
correlation research
|
- "natural experiments" that they cannot test in a controlled environment because it would not be ETHICAL
- tests to what extent 2 variables are related ex) effects of children watching violent television |
|
features of the correlation: direction
|
- positive correlation: when HIGH vales of one variable are associated with HIGH values of another variable
- vary in the SAME direction - negative correlation: when LOW values of a variable are associated with LOW values of another variable - vary in the OPPOSITE direction |
|
features of the correlation: strength
|
- how close is the relationship?
- how accurate is the prediction? - perfect (which is rare), high, moderate, weak |
|
measuring correlation: correlation coefficient
|
(r)
strongest negative= -1 strongest positive= +1 no relationship= 0 |
|
correlation and causality: limitations
|
- correlation DOES NOT imply CAUSATION
-- it can predict relationships but not tell why/how - in a correlation study you CANNOT control all conditions - there are UNCONTROLLED confusing "third" variables |
|
correlation and causality: strengths
|
- "natural experiments" allow to study phenomena that cannot be studied experimentally
|
|
learning
|
- the change in an organisms behavior or mental processes as a result of experience
|
|
pavlov and his dogs
|
- studying digestion in dogs, pavlov used meat powder to stimulate digestive juices
- after awhile the dogs began to salivate at: - the sight of the powder - the sound of footsteps of the assistant who brought the powder |
|
UCS- unconditioned stimulus
|
produces an automatic "reflex" response without learning
|
|
UCR- unconditioned response
|
automatic "reflect" response to the UCS
|
|
CS- conditioned stimulus
|
when a NEUTRAL stimulus is presented repeatedly before a UCS it elicits a CR
ex) ringing bell before food |
|
CR- conditioned response
|
learned response (same as the UCR but usually less intense)
ex) salivating at ringing bell |
|
classical conditioning phases: acquisition
|
the learning phase during which a CR is established
|
|
classical conditioning phases: extinction
|
the gradual decrease in and elimination of the CR
- when the CS is presented repeatedly without the UCS ex) ring tone w/o giving food |
|
classical conditioning phases: spontaneous recovery
|
- the sudden emergence of an extinguished CR
- occurs when the CS is presented after a pause in extinction trials |
|
classical conditioning phases: renewal effect
|
- tendency of an extinguished CR to return when revisiting the original conditioning environment at a later time
- occurs without further conditioning trials |
|
aspects of classical conditioning: stimulus generalization
|
- CR occurs when a stimulus that is SIMILAR, but not identical, to the CS is presented
ex) different tone |
|
aspects of classical conditioning: stimulus discrimination
|
- CR DOES NOT occur when a stimulus that is similar, but not identical, to the CS is presented
- opposite of stimulus generalization |
|
aspects of classical conditioning: higher-order conditioning
|
- when an established CS is paired with a neutral stimulus, the neutral stimulus becomes a CS
|
|
aspects of classical conditioning: aversive conditioning
|
- classical conditioning to an unpleasant UCS
-- the UCR and CR are an AVOIDANCE (escape) respose ex) little albert |
|
What does the Little Albert experiment prove?
|
that human behavior can be shaped by direct control of an environment
|
|
behaviorism as a method
|
- Psychology should only focus on OBSERVABLE BEHAVIOR
- behavior is caused by events in the environment, not biology or inheritance, and not "internal events" - thinking and emotion lay outside the domain of scientific psychology because they cannot be directly observed |
|
what does classical conditioning help us understand?
|
- how the stimulus of an involuntary responses can be changed
-how AUTOMATIC responses (reflexes) occur in the presence of previously neutral stimuli |
|
Explain Thorndike's puzzle box? what does it show?
|
- hungry cat, piece of fish outside
- must pull string to escape - flails until it accidentally finds correct solution - time to escape decreases GRADUALLY - shows the learning of new VOLUNTARY behaviors |
|
Law of effect
|
- if a RESPONSE occurs in the presence of a STIMULUS and is FOLLOWED by a SATISFYING STATE OF AFFAIRS the BOND between stiumulus and response will be STRENGTHENED
aka if a stimulus provokes a response that is followed by a series of satisfying affairs the bond between the stimulus and response will be strengthened |