• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/10

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

10 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Marbury v. MAdison
established the power of the Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of laws passed by congress and to act as the final authority over the meaning of the constitution - JUDICIAL REVIEW.
Barron V. Baltimore
The legal issue involed was whether the Bill of Rights could be used to restrain the legislative power of states or municipalities. Marshall's decision was that the bill of rights restricted only the federal government and that Americans would have to look to state constitutions for protection of their civil liberties against state government action. (reversed in the 20th century by "incorporation" process which is based upon due process clase of the 14th amendment)
Gibbons v. Ogden
Court rejected a NY law giving a monopoly to a steamboat company.
Chief justice Marshall gave the term "commerce" a very broad def. and asserted a power of Congress over interstate commerce that was nearly absolute.
Fletcher v. Peck
court asserted the right of the federal government to PROTECT CONTRACTS AGAINST STATE ACTION under the clause that prohibits states from "impairing the obligation of contracts"
Griswold v. Conn
right of privacy -> led to Roe V. Wade
Baker v. Conn
one man, one vote
malaportionment=illegal
McCullough V. Maryland
congress can charter banks, even though power was not specifically mentioned in the constitution, under the "necessary and proper" clause (elastic clause). also found it constitutional for states to tax any branch or office of the federal government ("the power to tax is the power to destroy").
Buckley v. Valejo
campaign finance - limits on contributions OK but not on spending
Federalist PApers
James madasion- functions inevitable therefore seperation of powers
ny times vs. sullivan
public figure must prove "actual malice" to win libel suit