• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/33

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

33 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Problems of Direct Dating(2)
1) Can't apply directly to most objects
2) Can't risk artifact depesLstruction
Direct Dating Types
Carbon 14
Electron Spin Resonance
Thermoluminesence dating
Indirect methods
apply dating techniques to objects found in layer
Indirect method types
stratigraphic layer
Relative Dating
compare site to others
Types of Relative Dating (2)
1) Faunal correlation-study other fossils near specimen
2)paleomagnetism-measure iron-grain orientation in rocks to determine polarity of earth
Absolute dating methods
Radiopotassium dating
Taphonomy
study of the process by which bones become fossilized
Prognathic
Protruding Cranium
Catarrhine evolution
1) Fossil record locations insonsistant with modern reality
2) Now more abundant and diverse
Old World Monkeys
Then
Apes
3. Apes only smaller in diversity
Algeripithecus minutus
Pronograde-body parallel to ground
Orthograde-body vertical
Intermembral index-arm to leg length ratio
Artifacts
portable objects
Features
nonportable aspects
Eco-facts
culturally important natural objects
Matrix
material that surrounds artifacts
ProvenienceTrans
where something comes from
the location of artifacts and features in 3-D space
Association
where something comes from
Cultural Transformation Processes
humans affecting sites
Natural Transformation Processes
Bacteria
Techniques
Survey, test pit, telephone booth, trench, open area excavation
Relative Dating Techniques
General Time period
Stratigraphy
Typology
Seration
C-14
Goes back 40kya
Pottasium Argon before 200kya
Dendrochronology-tree ring dating
Primate models
tries to find a close ancestor
Phylogenetic models
identifies basic shared behavioral characteristics amoung humans and african apes
mosaic evolution
the process by which different aspects of a species morphology evolve at different rates
Biomechanics of bipedalism
striding gait, swing phase, stance phase
Paleocene
65-55mya
Impossible to tell primates apart from others in mammal
Fossil material scarce
Eocene
55-34
Easy to I.D. primates
Many eocene fossils look like prosimians
Over 60 recognized genre
Adaptave radiatiation
Adapoidea-
contains canceous adapus notharctus and smilodectes
1)larger brain cases
2)Post Orbital Bar
3)Nails, no claws
4)Eyes rotated forward
ONomyoidea
looks less like lemurs
Anthropoid ancestors?
Farum depression ne
near cairo
Oligocene 34-23mya
Anthropoids emerge
Lots of adaptive radiation
1)Apidium-most abundent
-size of a squirrel
-2-1-3-3 dental formula
2)Propliopithecus
-2-1-2-3
-bigger fossils (cat sized)
3)Aegyptopithecus
-ONe of the biggest fayum animals
-slow moving quadraped
-sexual dimorphism
Miocene 23-5mya
period of apes or hominoids
wide range of fossils from up to 1000 individuals
Lots of debate
Proconsul, Pryopithecus and Sivapithecus
Proconsul
some in open woodlands
terrestrial quadrapeds
2-1-2-3 dental formula
Genus varies in size 8-150 pounds
Brain size similar to modern monkey