• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/6

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

6 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

When Sulkunen collected 140 scenes from 47 films, how did this media present addictive behaviour?

• presented drug competence as a way of reducing life problems and for enjoyment


• which contrasts with the apparent dullness of life

When Gunasekera et al reviewed 87 of the most popular films over the past 20 years, what did 1/3 show and 2/3 show?

• 1/3 of the movies portrayed alcohol use


• 2/3 showed smoking


• only positive consequences of drug use were shown and not the negative effects

What type of correlation was there with smoking in films and in young people founded by Sargent and Hanewinkel?

• positive correlation


• 4000 teenagers were surveyed and it was found that for those who were non smokers, exposure to movie smoking over a year was a strong predictor of whether they had begun smoking a year later

With Kramer's 5 week TV self help intervention for problem drinking, what were the results?

• was found effective in reducing alcohol intake


• this shows that media does have an influence on addictive behaviour

Against: How does Boyd suggest that films do present the negative consequences of alcohol and drug dependence?

• shows it through physical problems, experience of sexual abuse and violence

Against: when Hornick did an anti-drug media campaign in the US, using TV, radio and the internet to spread message of drug consequences, what did he find?

• campaign was unsuccessful and may have increased marijuana use, possibly because it included portrayals of groups of teenaged consuming marjiuana together


• accidentally emphasising the social benefits of marijuana use to make teenagers more likely to consume it