• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/17

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

17 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Place-Time Model of Social Interaction
- Based on the options that negotiators have when doing business across different locations and times
face 2 face
conveys the richest info b/c there is a facial expression, body language, tone of voice
______ produces more win-win outcomes and even pie slicing
preference of negotiation
face 2 face
same time, different place
loss of informal communication
loss off opportunity
separation of feedback
negotiating timing can be both bad and good
different time, same place
negotiatiors interact asynchronously (at different times)
different place, different time
Ex: email
five key biases affecting ability of people to negotiate through email
temporal synchrony bias
burned bridges bias
squeaky wheel bias
sinister attribution bias
temporal synchrony bias
__ is the tendency of negotiators to behave as if they are communicating synchronously when in fact they are not
_____ is the tendency for e-negotiators to engage in more risky interpersonal behaviors (making threats and demands and ultimatums) in an impoverished medium that they would face-to-face
burned bridges bias
____ is the tendency of negotiators to adopt an adversarial negotiation style, when communication via email- whereas the same negotiator might use a positive emotional style in a face-to-face interaction.
Squeaky wheel bias
__ is the tendency for e-communicators to ascribe diabolical intentions to the other party
Sinister attribution bias
IT and it's effect on social behavior
status and power
social networking
risk taking
rapport and social norms
paranoia
new roles
status and power
the weak gets strong effect- allows weak individuals to become strong and talk more
social networking
usually determined by who talks to who now determined by who communicates w/ who via tech.
risk taking
groups becomes risk seeking for both gains and losses via e-communication
paranoia
uncertainty increases paranoi and leaves people more likely to assume the worst about another person or situation
strategies for enhancing tech-mediated negotiations
initial face to face experience
one day videoconferencing/teleconference-
schmoozing