• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/18

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

18 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Harry Triandis
author of "The Self and Social Behavior in Cultural Contexts"
three types of self (Triandis)
private, public, and collective self
Triandis hypothesis
people sample private, public, and collective self with different probabilities in different cultures, which has consequences for social behavior
social identity (Triandis)
part of individual's self concept derived from membership in group
cultural complexity (Triandis)
number of distinguishable elements
integration (Triandis)
the extent a change in one element changes few versus many elements
three measures of cultures (Triandis)
cultural complexity; individualism/collectivism; tight/loose
individualists (Triandis)
priority to personal goals
collectivists (Triandis)
no distinction between personal and collective goals, or if there is a distinction, emphasizes collective
power distance (Triandis)
tendency to see a large difference between those with power and those without power; high in collectivist societies
idiocentrics (Triandis)
individuals that are individualistic
allocentrics (Triandis)
individuals that are collectivist
tight cultures (Triandis)
clear norms reliably imposed, little deviation tolerated
loose cultures (Triandis)
unclear norms or tolerate deviance
Triandis conclusion
sampling collective self more common in communal relationship; collective and tight cultures sampled public self; kind of self is a major determinant of social behavior
Markus & Kitayama
authors of "A Collective Fear of the Collective: Implications for Selves and Theories of Selves"
Markus & Kitayama theory
Japan emphasizes interdependence of self as individual and as collective self; America emphasizes independence of collective and individual self
ethnicity of "none" (Markus & Kitayama)
privilege of group in power; ethnicity and heritage not as central to identity because part of majority