Why We Shouldn T Trackers Be In Student Ids

Improved Essays
Trackers shouldn't be in student IDs. “Privacy is not about something to hide. Privacy is about something to protect (Jim Harper)”. This explains how privacy is important, especially when there's no consent. Schools should ask for consent before putting trackers in student ID’s, it's a big invasion of privacy. Schools are making students a target for danger when putting a tracker with all their personal information on it. Schools shouldn't put trackers in their IDs because it's an invasion of privacy. Hackers can get their personal information, and it's not necessary. First, it is an invasion of the privacy of students who are required to wear it at all times, even if they don't want to. The devices hold information about the student and parents aren't happy about it. The fact that schools …show more content…
This shows how creepy and is an invasion of privacy, the family and student most of the time have given no consent to the school. Schools should not be able to put tracking devices in student IDs because it makes students and parents uncomfortable, as well as hackers can get their information. Student ID’s hold all the information about the student that people can get hold of and see and access like hackers. Student ID’s have the students photo, name, date of birth and the school name which anyone can see and access. In the article it states Requiring students to wear these tags also poses a danger to students outside the school (Victor). This proof shows how unwanted strangers can be able to stalk and follow students, which is horrible and creepy. Schools have no way of really protecting students, especially because the students' information can be seen by anyone. Schools shouldn't have to require young kids to wear their personal information out in the open, even so there's really no need for trackers in the ID’s of

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Unfortunately, some companies have mismanaged their greatest asset—their brands. This is what befell the popular Snapple brand almost as soon as Quaker Oats bought the beverage marketer for $1.7 billion in 1994. Snapple had become a hit through powerful grassroots marketing and distribution through small outlets and convenience stores. Analysts said that because Quaker did not understand the brand’s appeal, it made the mistake of changing the ads and the distribution. Snapple lost so much money…

    • 230399 Words
    • 922 Pages
    Great Essays