prediction that human ancestors would be found in Africa, we can predict when common ancestor would appear for example, the discovery of the” fishapod” Tiktaalik in 370-million-year-old-rocks. I could not dispute that through science and the great work they have helped us to understand what went on in the past, and might be able to predict what might go on in the future concerning evolution. But I still haven’t read in this book or Your Inner Fish that there is absolute proof of the evolutionary theory. To me we still cannot say that Darwinism have been verified. I can see through what we have been studying how evolution occurred when it comes to dead things bones. But I think it only apply to that dead thing. It doesn’t prove anything about
…show more content…
This is my opinion and I am probably real wrong, but like I said, I still can’t tell what the word Redux means but I am willing to keep studying until I do. Chapter 9 talks about Evolution Redux, and The Best Within. And on page 224 it asked: Why does the public care so passionately about a theory of biology? Because people since inductively that there’s much more at state than a scientific theory. They know that when naturalistic evolution is taught in the science classroom, then a naturalistic view of ethics will be taught down the hallway in the history classroom, the sociology classroom, the family life classroom, and all areas of the curriculum. Nancy Pearcey an American Philosopher called this a common fear. I do agree with our text when it talks about The Best Within, a common belief about evolution is that if we recognize that we are only evolved animals there will be nothing to prevent us from acting like beast. When I read this in …show more content…
I think I would have better enjoyed this class if we had the time to stay on each chapter for about a month In order to really know what these chapters are talking about. My family especially my husband has also learned through my discussing our weekly discussion questions with them because they have been so very, very, very interesting to all of us. But they are asking me not to talk about evolution all day. Why evolution is true? I don’t believe we can yet answer that. We are still, and will be trying to figure that out for a long time, but for me God is Alpha and Omega the creator of all living
This is my opinion and I am probably real wrong, but like I said, I still can’t tell what the word Redux means but I am willing to keep studying until I do. Chapter 9 talks about Evolution Redux, and The Best Within. And on page 224 it asked: Why does the public care so passionately about a theory of biology? Because people since inductively that there’s much more at state than a scientific theory. They know that when naturalistic evolution is taught in the science classroom, then a naturalistic view of ethics will be taught down the hallway in the history classroom, the sociology classroom, the family life classroom, and all areas of the curriculum. Nancy Pearcey an American Philosopher called this a common fear. I do agree with our text when it talks about The Best Within, a common belief about evolution is that if we recognize that we are only evolved animals there will be nothing to prevent us from acting like beast. When I read this in …show more content…
I think I would have better enjoyed this class if we had the time to stay on each chapter for about a month In order to really know what these chapters are talking about. My family especially my husband has also learned through my discussing our weekly discussion questions with them because they have been so very, very, very interesting to all of us. But they are asking me not to talk about evolution all day. Why evolution is true? I don’t believe we can yet answer that. We are still, and will be trying to figure that out for a long time, but for me God is Alpha and Omega the creator of all living