Adam Smith's Theory Of Moral Sentiments

Great Essays
Lila Shrestha
Prof. Kang
POL 3103
12/13/2015
Introduction

The Hypothesis of Moral Sentiments by Adam smith theory basically gives the idea of moral judgment associated with human sentiments, feelings or notions in a very natural way of human life. According to various review, it is a book of social and intellectual research however, Smith 's ethical hypothesis has some remarkable weaknesses as well. Firstly, it offers us no distinctive methodology for choosing which moves we make in particular circumstances that the unbiased observer can say it virtuous. Secondly, the virtuous person appears to be excessively involved in benefits of the general public that is completely out of bias society or to assist us with looking after every single individual.
…show more content…
He says that morality of the person is the result of his and her ability to sympathy to other people and argues that though the source of sorrow or misery can be variant on different people but everyone in the society are naturally capable of understanding and identifying the sorrow of other people despite of good or bad person. Later on Smith connects the power of those natural drives and sympathies with virtues and virtuousness saying that mutual feeling of compassion can lead to bring virtues in the society and also make people more virtuous. With this discussion he has suggested three principles of morality that are basically related to the lessons regarding the other people’s interests and …show more content…
First it utilizes estimations instead of reason as the premise of its judgments. The unbiased observer should be free of incomplete sentiments however our emotions are well formed by our social orders. And it is not clear how to implement those trusts on emotions that could adjust for feelings combined with them. Second the impartial spectator creates inside of us as a component of our activities to adjust our emotions to those of the general population quickly around us. The main part of human happiness, for Smith originates from the awareness that we are dearest. However that is unrealistic unless our sentiments, and the moves we make on those emotions, meet with other individuals ' agreement. These are the sorts of observations that drove Smith himself to stress over the risk that set up custom can contort moral judgment and that nature may lead individuals, absurdly and treacherously to respect the rich and detest poor people. In the same way he is also stressed that political group and religious obsession can distort our ethical

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Enlightenment Dbq Essay

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There was once a time where people had no individual rights, also known as the enlightenment period. The enlightenment period was a time also referred to as “The age of reason” where people known as philosophers would meet and discuss politics, religion, economics, and social questions. Accordingly, the main idea of the enlightenment period was the philosophers who discussed ways to alter society. The four main philosophers were; John Locke, Francois-Marie Arouet (Voltaire), Adam Smith, and Mary Wollstonecraft. All four philosophers have different beliefs, but the one thing they all agree on is the believe of individual rights.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most individuals generally like to think of themselves as moral human beings. They often directly link their moral judgments to reason alone. However, in the 18th century, Hume made the suggestion that moral judgments could be based on emotions rather than unadulterated reason. In his Moral Philosophy, Hume argues that moral distinctions are not derived from reason, but rather determined by moral emotions: feelings of approval, or disgust felt by spectators who contemplate a moral trait or action (Owen, 1992). Moral judgments find their foundation in an assessment of actions of people with respect to the set of merits ingrained in their society (Haidt, 2001).…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Science is the great antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition.” Adam smith wrote this robust statement in his book The Wealth of Nations in 1776 (para. 203). Adam Smith was a brilliant Scottish social philosopher, who forever influenced economics with his book The Wealth of Nations. In this book Adam Smith wrote about many different aspects of an economy, consequentially, he wrote a metaphor that has shaped his legacy tremendously. The metaphor he wrote dealt with the “free market” theory; which he wrote acted as an “invisible hand.”…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charles Darwin’s way of thinking expanded far beyond his area of expertise, it expended all the way to psychology, physics, literature and even politics and economics. If you asked him “How much of his work would impact other fields?” personally I do not think he would have known. Darwinian thinking is now deeply engraved in areas such as economics and even business administration. Through this paper I will attempt to see how Darwin interacted with economists of his time such as Karl Marx, how much Adam Smith influenced Darwin, and how the Victorian economy affected how people acted.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One might have same views, but what is different is that they approach them differently. Adam Smith and Karl marx are two economic philosophers best known for their social and economic thinking on how to drive an economy of capitalist views. These ideas in each of their works the Wealth of the Nations by Adam Smith and The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx both portray their ideologies on how a society functions. These ideas still lives with generations and gives lineage to the capitalistic society we live in. However, the same ideas that these economic philosopher had drove to different conclusions on how a capitalistic society should function.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Abolition of Man and That Hideous Strength by C.S. Lewis are novels based on lectures given by the author that pursue the theme of man lacking empathy. Within the first book, The Abolition of Man, Lewis describes the importance of basing all judgments we make on what he calls the Tao: the conception of human behavior that, historically and in different moral traditions, has been considered good. As an emotion is not a judgment, it can be said that emotions and feelings do not respond to logical reasons—yet, they can be reasonable or unreasonable. Lewis states that “the heart never replaces the head; but it can, and must, obey it” (The Abolition of Man 19). Therefore, if Aristotle says that the aim of education is to get the student to have predilections and aversions for what corresponds, “the duty of the modern educator is not to cut down forests, but to irrigate deserts”, that is, the way to help the student to defend oneself properly against false feelings is to inculcate fair feelings (The Abolition of Man 13-14).…

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I will argue that Mencius’ altruistic position and four dispositions offer more precise explanations of human motivation than Glaucon’s support of psychological egoism. I contend that humans all have the capacity to partake in moral acts (e.g., helping kin and others, altruism, combatting injustice, etc.). Glaucon’s defense of psychologically egoistic motivation is only useful to recognize that human beings harbor a degree of self-preservation (i.e., to guard oneself from harm and fatality). I will first describe both Glaucon and Mencius’ assertions and the examples they used to substantiate their claims. Second, I will discuss how their fundamental concepts differ.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill, a philosopher during the mid-1800’s, is known as one of the most important western political philosophers in the past three hundred years. Many of his arguments on freedom can be seen intertwined with the current way we run societies around the world today. Being a self proclaimed Utilitarian, Mill focuses his arguments on making the collective reside with the most utility possible, with utility being defined by happiness. To achieve maximum utility, Mill presents three larger arguments,the harm principle, experiments of living, and freedom of speech. Before one can begin to agree or criticize Mill's arguments they must first delve into the core of Mill’s teachings, the harm principle.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever wondered where all the ideal ideas for American government came from. ”The Age of Enlightenment” or “The Age of Reason” was the age when people gave new bright ideas towards the government. A lot of the ideas for American government came from the Enlightenment period. Philosophers from the 17th and the 18th century a lot of ideas of great ideas on the topics of religious,social,economic,and political freedoms. Adam Smith believed that people were free and they can pursue whatever they wanted.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill contends that opinions should not be expressed if this is done to cause mischief and that they are permissible to be expressed if they do not. He argues that it is justifiable that a man expresses a negative opinion towards the ownership of private property or states that merchants are the reason for poverty (Mill 52). Although controversial in nature, such opinions are not harming anyone and for this reason, should have the ability to circulate. However, the opinion is only justifiable in certain instances where the context of the situation affirms it is not inflicting harm on another individual or a group (Mill 16). To illustrate this point, Mill refers to a scenario in which the same opinion is expressed by a group of people which could lead to dangerous circumstances (e.g. mob outside of corn-dealers house).…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Egoism Analysis

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    James Rachels writes about ethical egoism and psychological egoism and the comparison of the two. He does a nice job of providing the two views with a fair start but nicely points out their weaknesses. Initially, I did not understand psychological egoism because it seemed narrow-minded, however, after reading Rachels article, I have come to a better understanding that psychological egoism is an invalid theory. It is important to understand the differences’ between psychological egoism and ethical egoism. Psychological egoism is a view that “all men are selfish in everything that they do, that is, that the only motive from which anyone ever acts is self-interest”.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Understanding virtue ethics theories begins with understanding the concept of the ideal character traits a virtuous and ethical person has according to Aristotle’s Ethical Theory. I will argue that virtue ethics relies on the actions of a person in adhering to their duty as a part of society’s moral expectations. Louden argues that a contemporary analysis is necessary while holding a more pragmatic application about Aristotle’s view of practical wisdom as the standard of a person’s virtue ethics. I contend that this fails because it only focused on the realities of the contemporary world versus the polis community of the Aristotle’s era when he formed his theory. After first explaining Loudens argument for moral evaluation that it only takes…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics is a branch of philosophy that, at its core, seeks to understand and to determine how human actions can be judged as right or wrong. There are multiple variations and subclasses of ethical theories. These theories that help us with decision making can be challenged or critiqued. In particular Mill’s Utilitarianism, an ethical theory that promoted the greatest happiness for the greatest number, was criticized by Charles Taylor in his article The Diversity of Goods. The article written by Charles Taylor argues a utilitarian and consequentialist conception of morality leaves out essential aspects of human experience that are integral to our moral lives.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hume believed that justice promoted human happiness. Hume was a moral sentimentalist so he believed morality was grounded in something other than reason. He was similar to Hutcheson in this aspect but he also believed individual justice can sometime conflict with what benevolence would motivate us to do. A sentimentalist believes that judgments about what is right depends on our passions rather than reason or a moral sense but, he also thinks the sentimentalist owes us an account of how a sense of justice that is opposed to sympathy or self-interest that can also develop out of such motives. The virtue of justice in not natural and is actually artificial according to Hume.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social Unrest Claims in the Distribution of Wealth This paper encompasses the different aspects of wealth as they are understood in today’s time as well as in Adam Smith lifetime. The responses to our social society and economy that Adam Smith might have are discussed as well as his idea of a free economy. The ideas Adam Smith held about status and fairness are also examined as his desire was to better the economy and its individuals and create a smaller gap in education and social classes. The aspect of larger taxes on the wealthy are addressed in contrast to how the poor are taxed in today’s society.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics