Ethics And Globalization In Peter Singer's One World

Improved Essays
Peter Singer is on of the world’s most influential philosophers. Peter Singer’s book, One World, is about the ethics of the world and globalization. Throughout the book, Singer brings up different examples of what is going on in the world, and what we are doing wrong. For instance, there was more funding for 9/11 victims over funding for poor families across the world. There are four dilemmas Singer talks about in his book, and the ethical solutions to these dilemmas. The four dilemmas are the atmosphere, the economy, the law, and the community.
The major dilemma with the atmosphere is how to regulate the pollution levels and other issues affecting the atmosphere. Major effects will happen if things do not change, but who is to blame? Singer gives four different solutions to lower pollution levels. The first principle is the polluter pays where the countries pays for the amount of emissions. Singer compares this to a global sink. The second solution is the time slice principle where the countries will wipe their slates clean and start from 1990s. The third solution is an equal share for everyone where each country is allowed the same amount of per capita emissions. The countries would come up with a number and compare that to where they are at now. The
…show more content…
In the book, Iyer explains a lot about his past and where he has come from. He explains what a global soul is to him. Global soul can have different definitions from different people. Is someone who purchases items from a global supply chain, a global soul? Iyer defines global soul as a citizen of this International Empire made of of fusions. In other words, someone who does not fit perfectly with one culture. Pico Iyer adds on to that definition throughout the chapters of his book. He also mentions different ways to acquire a global soul. The chapters are, the burning house, the airport, the global marketplace, the multiculture, the games, the empire, and the alien

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    What duty do we have to help those who might otherwise starve without our intervention? Is it our responsibility to help our fellow man in need or are we free to stand on the sidelines? Philosophers Jan Narveson and Peter Singer offer contrasting viewpoints on the moral obligations affluent nations have to aid and support the poor. Where Singer reasons that by having the privilege of living in nations of wealth, this benefit carries with it the moral obligation to help those around the world who are sentenced to live in absolute poverty, if only because of where fate had them born. In response, Narveson argues Singer is mistaken: our responsibility and duty first lies to our circle and we should never insist that others take the responsibility…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In order to have more of a background on the way that Peter Singer thinks, you should know what type of philosopher he is. Singer is a utilitarian philosopher, along with the likes of other famous philosophers such as David Hume and…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer is a philosopher who is well known for his resolves on humanitarian aid. He is distinguished for his commitment to certain ethics that spark conflicts between our rational mind and intuition. Peter Singer’s approaches in various ethical debates helps in drawing a line through the formerly grey areas in many academic discussions. Singer explains his arguments and morals in ways that are persuasive and rational; however on occasion Singer’s resolutions are counterintuitive – but often nonetheless true – and confronting.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis of “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” The article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” is written by Peter Singer and published in 1999 by The New York Times Magazine. Peter Singer gives his solution to a way Americans can be freed from poverty. Singer believes that Americans spend more money on items that are considered luxury instead of things that they may need.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many protestations to Singer’s opinion that; we have moral obligations to contribute for the prevention of poverty. Such efforts to deny our moral obligation to the world’s poor originate from various ethical positions. Two of such objections are as follows: The first objection has consequential logic, however its conclusion is different. It states that by preventing poverty now, it may lead to more suffering in the future, so we should implement a triage policy - providing help according to the urgency of need of care - in order to lessen the usage of resources which inevitably will be need in the future (Campbell et al,…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer identifies the moral problem in society and the lack of individual participation in global affairs. More specifically, a lack of interest and contribution in the plight of the world’s most destitute and unfortunate. In Singer’s argument, he brings up several points in the defense of his position: proximity and quantity of possible contributors. Singer identified his argument as, “If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without sacrificing anything of comparable moral significance, we ought, morally, to do it.” Additionally, it is in individuals’ power to prevent bad things from happening.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Preference Utilitarian Peter Singer maintains that it is a moral wrong for those in affluent countries to not do more to prevent starvation in other parts of the world. Singer formulates this argument in his paper ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’. Singer argues from the side of consequentialism, in particular Utilitarianism; an ethical philosophy in which the happiness of the greatest number of people in the society is considered the greatest good. Several philosophers have countered Singer’s theory, claiming that our moral duties are lessened by the distance of those suffering in other parts of the world. Moreover, critics of consequentialism argue that it does not allow agents to act in accordance with their own needs.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both the source and Legrain believe that the world will benefit from the influence of modern culture, and would argue that identity is able to thrive in the process of globalization because the new and different aspects introduced to a culture allow for a wider understanding and more opportunity for individuals to discover new talents and religions, both of which make up a large part of a person's identity. In the sources opinion, an individual would be able to choose what they wish and the resulting freedom would strengthen a sense of identity. The source might also state that many job opportunities are afforded to nations that experience social globalization, as is expected with the introduction of new businesses and companies. In opposition to the source, one might draw attention to dangers of social globalization, such as the disregard for smaller cultures that have been usurped by larger cultures, who wished to assimilate other nations and spread a culture that represented the beliefs of their…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Makes the World Go Round Professor of Bioethics, Peter Singer, explains in the article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” that all prosperous people should give all money that is not needed for basic necessities to places that are in need of food and medicine. As an American, I have knowledge this argument would shake up America as a whole. This could create a world of giving up the Capitalistic ways of America and the economic food chain. On the other hand, it could create a world of kindness and less violence. Can you imagine giving up your freedom to help others?…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Friedman concludes his prologues by describing the third factor that the Globalization system is run by. An individual and nation states can be a very dangerous combination. It is the internet that allows for these individuals to find strength within the people. Whether it is people transferring money, or people sending one another weapons, the internet is to thank for a lot that goes on. Friedman uses an example of a woman named Jody Williams, who won a Nobel Peace Prize for creating a treaty that does not allow landmines.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer ultimately believes that we are morally obligated to help those who need help and are suffering. He provides various arguments that support his belief that everyone should help the dying people of East Bengal. He starts off by assuming one thing, “suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad.” This assumption serves as a foundation for his many claims since it provides a definition for what he considers bad. Furthermore, his first claim is that we are morally obligated to stop bad things from happening only if we do not have to sacrifice something of equal value.…

    • 2138 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the article ‘Fewer people would mean fewer worries’, (Geer 2008, p.1) biologist Allen Geer contended that 1. technological solutions to environmental problems are inadequate, and 2. that stabilizing the population at present or lower levels is a durable and easy solution to implement. Therefore, stabilizing the population should be implemented as a solution to environmental problems such as climate change, either in tandem with, or in place of technological solutions. 1.1…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (P.393). This types of globalization create a super influential individuals that change the way people perceive the world and their action toward society whether if it is good or bad. The prime example of that was: Osama bin Laden, an individual with the power to influence both the market and the nation states and the person responsible for the attack of 9/11. Individual conflict happens every day with the most recent events like racism in the country and the conflict that is based on religion in everywhere around the world, in which events like; Ferguson on unjustified shooting, Charlie Hebdo shooting on the limitation of free speech, and most recently on the bans Iranians students…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor”, Hardin argues about “a world that must solve real and pressing problems of overpopulation, hunger and moral duty.” Hardin sets the stage by first giving his analysis on the structure of the world today by describing the earth as a lifeboat rather than a spaceship. He then dives into how population control, the tragedy of the commons and immigration are some of the main reasons for the problems we have today. Hardin argues that simply helping people and giving charitably will not solve these problems. Peter Singer, in “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” seemingly goes against Hardin by saying that “if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays