Rosalind Franklin And The Double Helix

Superior Essays
The Battle of the Minds Wrought with regimented formulas and unfeeling calculations, the idea of science as an unyielding regiment circulates as popular belief. To the majority of the population the process of creating a hypothesis, preforming an experiment, and formulating a conclusion repeats indefinitely until someone reaches a breakthrough. However, this seemingly unending cycle fails to encompass the inconstancy of the scientific process. The scientific findings surrounding the discovery of the structure of DNA, or Deoxyribonucleic acid, proves that the scientific process results from a nonlinear process. Beginning in one part of the world and ending in another, the search for the solution to the puzzle of DNA took on a life of its own. …show more content…
Shedding light upon what it means to be a scientist and the true scientific process, Watson 's “The Double Helix”, Lynne Osman Elkin’s “Rosalind Franklin and the Double Helix”, and NOVA 's Photo 51, bring together different perspectives of the epic adventure to reveal the truth of the “secret of life” and the often unseen inner workings of the world of science (Watson 197). The journey to the structure of DNA took many trials and errors, yet the most significant moments might be those concerning morality. We think that scientists work together for the betterment of society. For instance, naturally the scientists working on cancer research immediately share their findings to help each other in the interest of saving people, right? If we trust in James Watson’s account on the discovery of the …show more content…
The race began in the spring of 1951 for Watson, yet he was not the only player in this game. Watson names Maurice Wilkins, Rosalind Franklin, Linus Pauling, Francis Crick, and himself as the primary contestants in the race, yet in 1962 only three made it to the finish: The Nobel Prize (Watson 4, Elkin 42). Through the long process of finding the structure of DNA, each of the scientists named contributed a great deal. The only recently acknowledged scientist Rosalind Franklin, a young woman working on DNA at King’s College London from 1951 to 1953, faced segregation and sexism everyday (Elkin 42). Although she often did not get along with the men in the lab, they made it very clear that she was not welcomed in certain social places throughout the college (NOVA). Supplementing the male dominated culture of King’s, Maurice Wilkins, one of the scientists working on DNA and Franklin’s coworker, greatly disliked Franklin. Wilkins, shy and quiet, and Franklin, loud and opinionated, often clashed when it came to their personalities as well as their work (NOVA). Throughout his novel, Watson refers to Franklin as “Rosy” clearly trying to minimize her importance. He often describes her as “hardly able to control her temper” (165), “not unattractive… had she taken even a mild interest in clothes” (17), and “incompetent at interpreting X-ray pictures” (166). The novel presents Franklin as the perfect villain;

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Hope Jahren begins her memoir by stating that we are all scientists as long as we ask questions. She states that it’s not nearly as involved as people make it out to be and we don’t need to study math, physics, or chemistry to be great scientists. She explains the importance of being curious and then begins her life’s journey. This is not a book that I would pick up to read for fun, but it was quite educational and fascinating. Hope Jahren’s journey to becoming a scientist starts from gaining interest in her father’s lab and planting a garden with her mother.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Morality is defined by discerning right from wrong, which is something scientists who conducted human research were unable to do. In the book, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, written by Rebecca Skloot, Henrietta Lacks is an African-American woman who developed an aggressive form of cervical cancer. Although she is treated for the cancer, the treatment is executed much later than if she had been a white woman. During her first operation to treat the cancer, the surgeon removed two pieces of tissue from her cervix to give to George Gey, the head of tissue research at Johns Hopkins. The story unfolded after Henrietta died months later, and then after a couple decades the family began to discover the truth of her death, and the cells which…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Well-known scientist, John M. Barry, in his book The Great Influenza presents the idea of advancements in scientific research is created by uncertainty yet, creating more uncertainty. He adopts a philosophical tone in order to convey to his readers that uncertainty is a tool used to expand knowledge. Barry utilizes antithetical and analogies in his writing to communicate that idea. Barry begins his writing by juxtaposing the strength and thoughts about certainty with the weakness and fear of uncertainty to better describe the process of scientific research. He interprets this idea in his third paragraph by contrasting scientists and the possibility that all work could disproven and lost in just a “single laboratory finding”.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rebecca Skloot, in the second part of the “Immortal life of Henrietta Lacks”, extensively examines the relationship of science with the non-scientific and indicates the reality of the scientific community. Basically, the reading explicates the consequences, both within and outside science, of the research enthusiasm of the scientists. Humans are classified in terms of their ability and regularity of exercising science. This categorization is quite different from those based on identity such as gender, race etc.: the latter is tied to a person since (s)he is born and is not detachable, while a reputable rank in the former is attained through material efforts.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Science is not a body of facts. Science is a state of mind” (Angier 490). Both essays, “The Canon” by Natalie Angier and “Scientific Literacy and the Habit of Discourse” by Thomas W. Martin, discuss that science is not a set of facts to be learned, but is best practiced through actions. These two articles approach the topic differently by using different rhetorical modes and styles. Even though the article’s main points have similarities, the essays contain many differences through their rhetorical modes, approaches, and writing styles.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The book, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot, provides insight to scientific development issues in the mid 1900’s through the eyes of the Lacks family, the scientists involved, and the author herself. Three key issues discussed in this book are the ethics of informed consent for research, the ethics of genetic engineering, and how scientists relay information to people who are not experts in their areas of practice. The foundation of this book revolves around the ethical issue of consent in research and when it is necessary. In the mid 1950’s there were very few laws about doctors and scientists obtaining informed consent from patients before treating them, experimenting on them, or taking tissues or sample cells from them…

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Barry asserts that scientists exist at the “frontier” of discovery though “only the best among them move deep into the wilderness.” Barry furthers his analogy by highlighting precarious nature of scientific inquiry. He likens research to standing on the edge of a cliff. One step can send scientists into a “world that seems entirely different.” Another step could lead directly to failure.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Watson has made many accomplishments throughout his life2. He was one of three that published their finding on DNA molecules, which won them a Nobel Prize3. He taught for 15 years at Harvard University2. While he was there, he published his very own book called Molecular Biology of the Gene, which became one of the most extensively used biology texts3.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Why We Should Trust Scientists,” by Naomi Oreskes, the presenter describes what makes science so unique, and distinguishes it from other fields such as religion. Oreskes claims that science is an appeal to authority, but unlike other similar appeals, it is the collective authority of a group of people, somewhat like a community. Throughout her speech, she conveys to her audience different examples of historical figures who worked in science, and uses them as proofs to help understand the point that she is making. In doing so, she describes that what makes this specific field so special, is the fact that science itself, and the ways that one tries to test a theory on a specific subject are not related; but rather, as was said by Paul Feyerabend…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 16th and 17th centuries, scientists began to question the long held theories of science. This new period, known as The Scientific Revolution, brought controversial opinions of political and social views. Scientists flourished with a variety of concepts, complex as the Three Laws of Motion, or as simple as the Heliocentric Model. Although we still follow these theories and support the studies of science today, life wasn’t that easy back then. Scientists were affected by many aspects of society such as church criticism, gender discrimination, and supportive leaders.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Appeal to Pathos: Examples: “You will surely make your dear mother happy should you make her breakfast.” “When you finally leave for college, I will be the only child left. I’m sure I will find myself all alone far more often, all without a fleeting bit of hope left. The last one left, that’s me. ... College awaits, no?”…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The sharp contrast created between the world as it is habitually seen and how a scientist sees it reveals how unclear and indeterminate the scientific process is. Being so different from how most people see the world, it is as if the perspective of a scientist is one that has pulled from a children’s fantasy novel, characterizing the world of science as unpredictable and even fantastical. Looking at the world through a scientific lends warps one’s perspective of it, allowing for the exploration of the fine details of life through science. In conclusion, everything becomes an opportunity for discovery and everything that seemed to be set in stone can still be…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this passage from The Great Influenza, by John M. Barry, the use of figurative language, imagery, anaphora and parallelism, symbolism and exclusionary tone words to characterize scientific research as a dynamic, tedious, and calculated field of study that requires a variety of personality traits including curiosity, patience, and creativity. Moreover, uncertainty is identified as a central theme and elaborated on as being a necessary part to the process of scientific experimentation. Throughout this essay, Barry uses figurative language, such as extended metaphor, to downplay the severity of decisions that scientists face. For instance, “Would a pick be best, or would dynamite work better- or would dynamite be too indiscriminately destructive?”…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While in the vice-president position of this association, Rowland developed a speech intended for the scientists willing to promote a more effective way of researching. This group consisted of scientists dedicated to improving the way scientific research was conducted in America. Rowland’s purpose for delivering this speech was to provide the indistinguishable evidence of wrongly-researched science that was concealed during the 19th century as a result of the working world. Ultimately, he wanted to encourage positive development towards the motives and ambitions of American science. In his speech A Plea for Pure Science, Rowland addresses the scarcity of “pure science” in the American community.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Topic: What is Science? What is Technology? Relationship between Science & Technology ‘Science and Technology’ are often discussed as two identical components however, a closer observation of these topics can reveal their distinction. For instance, a medical technology like X ray often have huge scientific background however it is interesting to note that the science of X rays has aspects beyond the X ray technology. According to Brooks (1994) science and technology can be considered as two parallel strands of a DNA where each technology and science are closely wired individually and also makes several cross connections in spite of the fact that independent parallel bonds within each of the science and technology is stronger than cross connections.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays