Sometimes, if not most of the time, an apology is offered by the offender. They apologize to their victim either directly about what they did to them or vaguely about the fact that they were harmed, since admitting guilt is not a required part of the victim offender …show more content…
Zehr really dissected the whole idea of restorative justice and showed how effective and advantageous it can truly be. Restorative justice is a much more effective way, in some cases, to deal with offenses. It provides closure for the victims and eases up the pain on the offenders. The restorative justice approach is better from the victim’s point of view because instead of just watching their offender be punished by the court system, they get to confront them themselves and almost put to rest the harm that was done to them. It is better for the offenders because sometimes an act is random rather than pre-meditated and they may feel the need to apologize to their victim and they may also feel a great deal of regret for what happened. It can really aid them in relieving some of that regret which to some people is a huge