3. First Amendment: Van Orden v. Perry case is about Orden suing Texas about a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of the state capital building. The question is does a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of a state capitol building violate the First Amendment’s establishment clause. The decision was it does not.…
The institution's encouragement to engage in religious related activities like meetings, striving for memberships and distribution of Gideon bibles all were part of the factors that challenged the establishment clause in the first amendment. The election of the student to say the prayer was also flawed and…
This Supreme Court is considered to be one of the most controversial and misunderstood decisions made in the history of the Supreme Court. The Engel v. Vitale Supreme Court case tackled the issue on whether or not a school’s nondenominational prayer is a violation of the first amendment. Now the First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and…
The Missouri Public Prayer Amendment was put on the ballet on August 7, 2012. This amendment is supposed to “guarantee state residents of Missouri the right to express religious beliefs and also would allow students in public schools to pray and acknowledge their religion voluntarily”. Supporters say that this amendment will protect their rights to practice their own beliefs, while Opposers say that this amendment was not necessary because constitution already states that anyone can practice their religion in the state already. The Opposers went even further to say that this amendment will be only a temporary measure but soon enough cause problems in the future. The Opposers reasoning supports Madison’s argument about how the majority will…
The First Amendment provides that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. U.S. Const. amend. I. Exemptions may be altered or repealed except those exempting real or personal property used exclusively for religious, educational or charitable purposes as defined by law and owned by any corporation or association organized exclusively for one or more of such purposes and not operating for profit. N.Y. Const.…
Sullivan states “There is no accepted legal way of talking in the United States about the vast array of religious beliefs and practices that are represented.” These cases support the idea that religious beliefs are tolerated in thought, however when put into action, the government takes measures to limit practices that go against the Protestant beliefs.…
In the year 2000, a case came to the floor of the Supreme Court dealing with interpretation of the First Amendment. In a country of the free, we are plagued by discrimination daily. The targets have shifted over the years. Religion and race seem to be the ever-present discriminatory subjects. Though religious groups also cause hate of those who are different in sexual orientation.…
Supreme Court cases have played a requisite role in modifying and defining certain amendments in the constitution. The decision of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans has displayed a monumental impact on American society, both at the time of the decision and in the latter future. Though the first amendment prohibits the restriction of speech and press, in this particular case the government was entitled to restrict those rights. The court argued that Texas specialty license plate designs constitute government speech, and thus Texas was entitled to refuse to issue plates featuring SCV’s proposed design. The court 's decision has stimulated great reaction in our nation causing dispute over whether the government passes off private speech as government speech.…
Given the intense debate that the potential creation of this monument caused, future monuments could cause the same debate and same discrimination that this museum would. People would no longer feel included or respected, but rather angered at being ignored and showcased, making a monument’s impact on the population a vital factor to consider when memorializing an event. In addition to mocking these people, a monument may not be what they truly desire. In South Dakota, for instance, a monument was being created to honor a single man of Amerindian descent, but many of his tribe believed that there were “better ways to help Indians than a big statue” (Source C). Going against these people’s wishes would force the monument upon them and go against their values.…
The monument needs very little maintenance and was completely paid for by the Fraternal Order of Eagles. In addition, the disclaimer crediting the Eagles with the donation is enough to overcome an Establishment Clause challenge. Also, the monument has been on the grounds for more than 40 years and nothing about it would lead a passer by to believe the State of Texas was endorsing or promoting religion by having it as part of the group of monuments. No one monument stood out, and, in fact, the Ten Commandments monument was smaller than most of the other…
A part of the First Amendment of the constitution states “[c]ongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” The Establishment Clause intends to prevent any government endorsement or support of religion (Freedom of Religion and the Establishment Clause). Throughout history and different time periods, many contrasting interpretations of this clause have formed. Many court cases have helped develop the meaning the this Clause. The Establishment Clause’s interpretation remains controversial, although numerous tests have helped the Clause itself.…
It is a completely formal publication written for the purpose of explaining the history of conflicts concerning religion in school and the rights that students, parents, and teachers have regarding the issue. The writer appeals to ethos and establishes credibility prior to the audience reading the article because the Pew Research Center is a well-known and trusted source. The writer also appeals to logos by including statistical information such as the quote, “According to an August 2006 survey by the Pew Research Center, more than two-thirds of Americans (69%) agree with the notion that ‘liberals have gone too far in trying to keep religion out of the schools and the government’” (Lupu et al para. 4). The article also contains many facts relating to Supreme Court rulings, such as “In Engel v.Vitale (1962), the Supreme Court held that the Establishment Clause prohibited the recitation of a school-sponsored prayer in public schools” (para. 9).…
“Does the phrase “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance merely acknowledge the role that religion has played in American history— without even presuming the existence of God? Such an interpretation appears to be unwarranted, since the Pledge makes no mention of the nation’s history or any of the aforementioned events,” (Kao, G. Y., & Copulsky, J. E. 2007). The students should not be required to stand and recite the pledge of allegiance due to the second amendment. It strips the students of the rights that the school system teaches them. They have the right to freedom of religion.…
Colleges always face a lot of scrutiny when it comes to how they are run. In recent years, the First Amendment has come into play on campuses across the nation. Many articles have been written defending both for and against restrictions, defending the use of trigger warnings in class, and explaining what this controversy is really about. While the colleges themselves have the power to choose what they do, they must consider what experience they want to provide for their students. What is Free Speech?…
Roadside memorials are notably everywhere on the streets and highways of Hawaii, where accidents have occurred unexpectedly. In The New York Times, Robert Tiernan observes that roadside memorials use public property for private purposes. He believes they violate the constitutional principle of separation of church and state because public facilities are being used to promote religion. He concludes they are a distraction and danger to the motoring public. Though Tiernan makes a sensible point, Sylvia Grider - a professor at Texas A&M University, states “Many people regard roadside memorial crosses as sacred, but not necessarily religious” (Grider, emphasis in original).…