Mills's Utilitarian Theory

Improved Essays
Mills utilitarian theory was written so that he could go over various misconceptions about the theory, and to address the value of utilitarianism. His theory states that every person’s happiness is equal to another’s, stating no one’s happiness is more important than anyone else’s. He adopts the principle that to achieve the greatest amount of happiness, you must do the greatest good. Mills also introduced the concept of right, and wrong decisions. Based off of this he states that a “wrong action” would be one that doesn’t maximize happiness. While one that does, would be a decision that does maximize happiness. The utilitarian theory requires us to have vast insight in some cases, into what the future may hold for us, as well as insight into …show more content…
In order for us to know they are a part of our happiness we would have to know they are coming. Based on what happiness is stated to be, which is pleasure with no pain, then in order to know what decisions will help us maximize happiness, we would have to already know the outcomes of these decisions. There is not always certainty which decisions will help maximize happiness for ourselves, or a group of people. You can however get a general idea of which decision would be best, based on an overview of what could be possible outcomes of the decisions. Being able to maximize happiness is an ideal that almost everyone would want. But in order to ensure that your happiness would be maximized, knowing the outcomes of your decisions before you make them is vital. A situation you thought could make you extremely happy, might instead make you miserable. In addition to this, there are also several key issues with utilitarianism. One being that for some people, complete happiness can come from brining misery to others. Obviously their happiness is not maximized through these decisions of others, that maximize their happiness. An example of this would be

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics Of Care Essay

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Humans thrive on the ability to make choices and have options. Choices allow for the greatest individuals benefit and ensures that we survive by making the best decisions for our well-being. Modern society has evolved in a way where we are no longer in constant danger for our lives, but instead, are looking for ways to thrive. Utilitarianism is a well-known moral theory that bases itself on the universal principle of utility which is described as “always acting in ways that maximize happiness and minimizing harm for the aggregate”. A theory such as Utilitarianism is very attractive and makes moral sense intuitively.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Stewart Mill and Immanuel Kant are two of the most influential philosophers in history. Their philosophies of utilitarianism and deontology, respectively, have different fundamental values and priorities. The fundamental principle of utilitarianism is that actions are morally correct in proportion to how much happiness they create, henceforth all people should strive to promote happiness and pleasure. Happiness, Mill states, is the ultimate objective of all human actions; one shall prefer those actions which yield the most happiness.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    His new theory essentially says that utilitarianism is to be used in a case by case basis, and if an action is indubitably wrong, even if it produces the greatest amount of pleasure, it should not be carried out (Sober, 343). An example of this might be child labor. It seems like the most pleasure would be produced for families and factories if children were to work daily, even in treacherous conditions. Thankfully, according to Mill’s theory, this would be determined to be ultimately wrong, and these types of situations would not occur. Although, with this new theory, a question arises: how do we determine what is “clearly wrong?”…

    • 1339 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You cannot predict the outcomes of utilitarian actions. There is no logical way to predict the future and to determine if the consequences will be beneficial in the long term as well as the short term. You also, cannot “calculate” the amount of pleasure and pain that will come from the decision or action. It is not possible to calculate it, because you cannot calculate how much pleasure and pain each person will gain from the action. Lastly, you cannot put a certain value on happiness.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When time is of the essence, utilitarianism can be a guide when we need to make a moral decision. It allows us to think with her heart and emotions, and not just our brains. This is what makes us different from animals and has enabled us to evolve into the people we are today. Utilitarianism allows people to live a happier life because they can make the choices that are best for them, their friends, and…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Mill “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (John Stuart Mill). In its simplest form utilitarianism can be defined as actions morally permissible if and only if they produce at least as much net happiness as any other available action. Its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. When making a decision for one’s self he/she must consider what will bring themselves the most happiness. When making a decision that will affects other…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that the utilitarianism way of following the rule of maximized expected utility is problematic as one cannot put value on the outcomes presented. He argues that during uncertain times of decision-making, parties are boxed in with two choices: maximize expected utility or maximin principle. The rules of maximizing expected utility, the parties are all required to list possible outcomes from different scenarios and note the value of the outcomes and choose the one with the best value (p. 283). The rule of maximin is simple: parties are to choose the best worst result. They are to assess the worst outcomes of the options and choose the one whose worst outcome is better than the other options (p.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill tells us in his Autobiography that the “little work with the name” Utilitarianism arose from unpublished material, the greater part of which he completed in the final years of his marriage to Harriet Taylor, that is, before 1858. For its publication he brought old manuscripts into form and added some new material. The work first appeared in 1861 as a series of three articles for Fraser’s Magazine, a journal that, though directed at an educated audience, was by no means a philosophical organ. Mill planned from the beginning a separate book publication, which came to light in 1863.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s Republic, Socrates rejects Polemarchus’s definition of justice – doing good to friends and harming enemies – because one cannot know good from evil unless they have knowledge of the nature of the good. Mistakes can be made in choosing good from evil if knowledge of the good is not obtained. In Mill’s Utilitarianism, Mill sees that actions are good if they tend to promote happiness (pleasure and the absence of pain) and bad if they tend to promote the opposite. This principle is what utilitarianism – the maximum pleasure, in the absence of pain, for the most people – is based on. Mill goes on to argue that the only proof that something is desirable, is if people desire it.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill is an advocate of utilitarianism. Many thinkers have considered sometimes force may contribute to greater collective utility than individual freedom. Can Mill defend utilitarianism and the harm principle: "That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others." Through the drug addict, the notion, utility and freedom can contradict, is seen. If society dissuades someone from trying an addictive drug, e.g. opioids, society subsidizes further to their utility (and the collective utility) than if society lets them seek the drug.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The recent events below have led to a series of protests over the past year but recently in the media the public has been advocating for the rights of African Americans in America based off of the neglect of the justice system for these young black men. These situations were all against young black males that had absolutely no reason to be murdered as a means to a solution. As these three situations only stand as representations of the many black male to be victimized by the police system in America it also shows us that although we have made strides in race relations and equality we still have a very long and tiring journey to go to be fully accepted by our fellow counterpart. Laquan McDonald was shot 16 times by a Chicago…

    • 1055 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of an action. Endowing to the classical utilitarian moral theory, we classify human acts or practices as we consider neither the nature of the acts or practices nor the motive for which people do what they do. This can harvest to one’s action; that a life conceivably is saved, which matters morally. There is no total distinction between what is right and what is wrong based on Bentham’s view, only if the consequences are the highest favorable for the person’s greatest happiness, even including the majority of the people related to this person who is responsible to give that action. Drawing a conclusion about utilitarianism, it is our duty to decide which action or practice is best by considering the likely or actual consequences of each substitute.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The problems with utilitarianism are that we can not all agree on what makes us happy. Even after obtaining such a consensus of what happiness is, it is even harder o decide what action allows us to arrive at such happiness for the masses. I agree with Mills when he declared that, utilitarianism is a doctrine worthy of…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays