Locke State Of Nature Essay

Decent Essays
Locke mentions “the state of nature” more than once in his passage. What is his point of central aim in discussing “the state of nature?” The state of nature, according to Locke, is that all creatures are made equal, therefore they all deserve to be treated equally. However, Locke argues that even though humans have a right to their state of nature, they must secure their liberties with a government that will protect them. This concept of the state of nature that Locke sets up is the primary foundation for a Democratic Republic. Locke bestows the power on the individual to have a voice in their government, but also the authority to strip the power away. Written in the late 17th century, the Second Treatise encapsulates Locke’s thoughts on how people can govern themselves, but this idea reflects what was occurring in England in the late 17th century. What this means is not only did Locke experience life during the Glorious Revolution, but also the English Civil Wars. Ultimately, he forms the idea that the state of nature is not only the freedom of people, but also using reason to govern themselves. Locke’s state …show more content…
The Parliament’s purpose was to give voice to more than one person for deciding how to rule the land. In Charles the First’s ignorance to the Parliament, he took away the freedom that people have to decide what goes on in their country. The inequality in the government influenced Locke to form his idea of the state of nature to educate people about the corruption going on. By Locke living through the English Civil War, it impacted his thinking which led him to transform society with the philosophy on the state of nature. He saw how kings would abuse the power, once again, simply to gain wealth. Allowing people to rule without any limits of their power makes them become power hungry, and their judgment is clouded by their personal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    John Locke contended that individual freedom was highly important in order to succeed in a suitable government. In “Of the State of Nature” and “Of the Dissolution of Government,” Locke stated that men and women are by nature independent and free, and have the absolute right to take care and maintain this freedom. (Document A). In order to take good care of the government, there would need to be two branches: a legislative and executive branch. Locke argued that a government that had been created by free individuals was more successful to preserve it, versus a monarchy.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Locke believed that the government should be ran by the people and everything should be made in the people’s favor. In the situation where the old government fails he recommended the legislative and executive branches but this decision is should be made by people. John Locke once stated in the “Second treatise on the Civil Government” “All Men are naturally “a state of perfect freedom… within the bounds of the law of nature”(Document A). What he meant from this is that We are all free and no one can stop us.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dorinda Outram’s book The Enlightenment contains the chapter “Enlightenment and Government” which highlights that contrary to popular belief, not all philosophes had the same ideas when it came to the ideal government. Outram focuses on the misconceptions people had about the Enlightenment and bring to light the true differences people had about government during this time period. Outram discusses the relationship between the Enlightenment and government, a relationship that has had few research. Through the lives of three leaders in Enlightenment and government John Lock, Baron de Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, it is clear how philosophes greatly differed yet had many similarities in the way they viewed government. John Locke’s view of government is based on the idea that all men are in a state of nature by God; Locke refers to this state as perfect freedom in Second Treatise on Government.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believed that the state of nature was one of free will, of equality, and of total freedom; within its boundaries. While this idea was one of perfection it was also had its counterpart. “But though men when they enter into society give up the equality, liberty, and executive power they had in the state of Nature into the hands of the society, to be so far disposed of by the legislative as the good of the society shall require, yet it being only with an intention in every one the better to preserve himself, his liberty and property” (Locke, Para 131). Locke believes there would always be war as long as there is man to declare it. Turning war into a never-ending cycle, due to the lack of civil authority in the state of nature.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Natural Rights Vs Feminism

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As stated by Locke, “To understand political power aright, and derive it from its original, we must consider what estate all men are naturally in, and this is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of Nature, without asking leave or depending upon the will of any other man” (Roots of Wisdom Pg. 365). Consequently, Locke believed that citizen should organize to protect their natural rights, to ensure that these right are not being abused by people of power or the government. As a result, Locke developed a social contract that states that the government and its people had mutual responsibilities in protecting these rights. On the other hand, Locke believed that “living in a state may entail consent to a social contract, but if the state abuses the power entrusted to it by its citizens, they retain the right to rebel” (Roots of Wisdom Pg.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. John Locke describes the “state of Nature” as total freedom. He says that people have the power to control their actions and get rid of their possessions or people as they please. In the “state of Nature” people don’t have to depend on another person and all people are equal. This state has its own law of Nature to govern it and the people are supposed to abide by it.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke believed people needed to form a government in order to protect their property. As stated in The Second Treatise of Government, “The great and chief end, therefore, of men’s uniting into commonwealths and putting themselves under government is the preservation of property…” (Locke, 37). Under the rule of the king, the natural rights people had to property (life, liberty, and estates) were taken, however, Locke believed that by joining or creating a representative government, their natural rights would be preserved. In contrast, Rousseau believed that the purpose of a direct government was to bring harmony and unite the people under the general will.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus an understanding of Locke’s personal philosophy is required for his views on government. John Locke believes that we naturally are in a state of perfect freedom in a situation where equality proves all power reciprocal. (51) When these states are not in place through the violation of liberty by another you enter the state of war, bringing about destruction to society and nature through. Liberty according to Locke in nature thus “is to be free from any superior power on earth… but to have only the law of nature for his rule.” (54)…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Second Treatise of Government, John Locke believes that in order to understand political power correctly, one must acknowledge that men by nature are free and equal because they were born with the faculty of reasoning. Locke argues that men have natural rights to liberty, freedom, and property. Men in the state of nature automatically possess liberty and freedom; however, their right to ownership of property is earned through labor. Even though men are equal and free in a state of nature they do not have the right to impinge on others because natural law exists. Natural law should be used as a guide.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke’s Second Treatise of Government allowed for the ideal that no ruler or government could do whatever they pleased because there were moral laws that encompassed all of society. However, Rousseau was adamant in his belief that man “is born free and everywhere he is in chains. ”1 Rousseau defended the right of the people to rule, he argued that the people were only accountable for themselves and the ruler or government had no right to subjugate the people. Locke and Rousseau’s idea of government are similar in the fact that they both embody some aspects of our government today. Rousseau inspired the phrase “We the people…”2 at the beginning of the Declaration of Independence because of his belief in the wisdom of the people to decide in their own affairs.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In John Locke’s Second Treatise and Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan, both authors introduce concepts of perfect societies built upon the initial state of nature for the purpose of ultimately escaping that state to enter a state of civility and peace. The state of nature is one governed by natural laws that each individual understands through their innate sense of reasoning. Hobbes condemns that state because he contends that in the state of nature, there is no property, which propagates fear and death because of a lack of common authority to settle matters on disagreements concerning things like ownership and retributions. Unlike Hobbes, Locke reasons that individuals can actually come into possessions in the state of nature and employs his theory…

    • 1291 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Locke claims that the state of nature is a state of perfect liberty. People in the state of nature are completely free, equal and independent. They can entirely follow the guidance of their own wishes and maintain their possessions without asking others consent and obey any other command or authority, as long as they comply with the law of nature. However, Locke also points out the disadvantages of the state of nature that if it is so free, it will full of continual dangers as people's property are very unsafe and insecure in this state. Others may interfere and invade their property since there are no stringent observers of justice.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So, he brings up compelling argument that those who are most virtuous should rule (100-103). While in the “Second Treatise of Government” Locke explains the nature of humanity, state of nature, and the civil government. Locke’s belief is that all humans are born into…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To start off, Both Locke and Hobbes believe in the state of nature, but their views of the state of nature are different. The state of nature is the nature of men before giving up any rights and or liberties to a sovereign power(government). First off, Thomas Hobbes believes that there is not a moral law in the state of nature. Basically, in the state of nature , we are free to do what we please because we lack giving up power to a sovereign entity to hold us accountable as a whole. John Locke disagrees.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays