Japanese Internment And The 14th Amendment Of The Constitution

Improved Essays
The internment violated numerous rights in the constitution. Such as the right to freedom of speech for Japanese Americans. In addition, many Nisei Japanese Americans were born American citizens. However, they were removed and forced to join the internment camps as well. This violates the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. In addition, Japanese Americans were forcibly denied freedom and their property without going to court. This violates the 5th and 6th Amendments of the Constitution. Japanese Americans do not have a trial or way to plead their case. It was beyond unjust and they had no chance of pleading their case. All because they had the face of the enemy. Another issue was the military randomly searching their homes with no warrant. …show more content…
During our class discussion, we saw various artworks of the tragedy. Other individuals protested and were not cooperative during the internment. They were brave enough to suffer punishment such as arrest or even death. In some cases, Japanese Americans decided to leave the United States. They wanted to return to Japan or failed the “loyalty test”. They were seen as traitors to Japanese Americans. These individuals dishonored their loyalty to the US. This is due to the obstacles endured during the internment. Furthermore, in order to challenge the internment, Japanese Americans chose to volunteer for war. They wanted to prove that Japanese Americans were “true” Americans. Even if they had to risk their lives to prove it. For example, Ben Kuroki is fighting for his right as an American citizen. Other individuals took the issue to court and demanded financial compensation for their items. Another court case would be Korematsu v. United States (1944). Challenging the internment in regard to the American constitution. In our class material, we also learned that Japanese Americans raise awareness about the issues. Sadly, there were Americans that had no idea of Executive Order

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Martial law and did not give The Secretary of War the power to break constitution. Since the Martial law has not been declared the standard civilian rights and constitutional laws are still in act on the territory of the United States in the created Military Zones. In this case, the Civilian Exclusion Order No. 34 which stated that all people of Japanese descent must be excluded from the military zone clearly violates the 5th Amendment that states “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    and culture, who were exported in to become slaves. Once the United States gained its independence from Great Britain, and later passed the 13th Amendment to abolish slavery people would still discriminant against African Americans. The African Americans would not be the only race to get discriminated in the United States the Mexican Americans, Japanese Americans, and women would also get discriminated. All the discrimination in the United States caused major dilemmas in society and created major…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    upholding laws or precedents that oppose them. For example, Justice Kennedy wrote of Texas v Johnson ‘The hard fact is that sometimes we must make decisions we do not like. We make them because they are right, right in the sense that the law and the Constitution, as we see them, compel the result.’. The vast majority of the work of judges is not deciding important social or political issues, but enforcing clearly set out laws or debating highly technical legal cases. Landmark cases such as abortion policy…

    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays