How Did Stalin Modernize Russia

Improved Essays
Ultimately, despite the criticisms of Stalin’s harsh rule he seemed to build Russia in the most effective way and so although he was a cold leader he still managed to modernise Russia so it could compete with the other modernised countries. The other leaders still impacted the political aspects of Russia but it seems like Stalin was the most successful in keeping law and order within the government and promoting himself to earn (or even force) loyalty from Russian society.
To conclude, the most influential figure in the modernisation of Russia 1855-1964 proved to be Stalin. Undeniably, all the leaders had some form on an impact in changing Russia to a new direction however Stalin proved to be the most successful and most efficient leader in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Stalin fought with the victors during WW2 but when the tides turned, he knew he had to change sides. Stalin knew the risks but he did what he had to to save the Motherland. Out of all countries who fought in world war two, Russia had the most casualties. One could argue that Stalin single handedly rose Russia up from the ashes of world war one. A good man has be stern in times of crisis, and Stalin made the tough choices so that others would not have to.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although well intentioned (in regards to modernization), Peter the Great’s attempts at modernizing Russia were futile, thus making him unfit for the title of “the Great.” His attempts at reform affected primarily the nobility, who were a minority in Russia, and scarcely affected the serfs, and left no lasting impression (concerning modernization) on the serfs. An example of how little Peter’s actions affected the majority of Russians is epitomized in his reforms concerning appearance. The majority of serfs were unaffected by this since they were too poor to buy the clothes needed to hold up dress codes or pay the tax punishment given if you did not follow the dress code. This symbolizes the majority of Peter the Great’s reform actions, with…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter the Great seemed to be an excellent dictator with an ambition to advance his nation. He was not afraid to pay a heavy price, including the division between the westernized elite and the peasant masses, to transform Russia into a major modern power. Peter’s reforms undeniably have some positive impacts that deserve an appreciation. Meanwhile, I do not believe that some of Peter’s methods to modernize his people, such as through their appearance and clothing, were necessary or even useful.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler were unarguably the two most powerful leaders to ever rule Russia and Germany. The pair spread terror across the Europe as they took power and aimed to consolidate it. Stalin was born in Georgia, which was then part of the Russian empire, and was the son of a cobbler. During his time as a student he began reading Marxist literature and it inspired him to devote his time to the revolutionary movement against the Russian monarchy. He would often get arrested and exiled to Siberia during his time as an activist, however when the Bolsheviks seized power in 1917 he rose through the ranks of the party.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The introduction of collectivisation and industrialisation also referred to as the Five Year Plans, had both positive impacts and negative impacts on Soviet society and the economy. Following the rise to power of Russian dictator Joseph Stalin in the late 1920s, the country had apparent prosperity and stability, with the party securely in power and the new economic policy recovering the economy. However, Stalin was in a similar position to that of his predecessors, as the Russian economy was still in shambles and on the verge of an economic crisis, due to the inefficiency and lack of development of industry. Stalin’s plan to solve these fundamental problems was to transform Russia into a modern, industrial powerhouse. Stalin was able to attain…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    How Did Stalin Change

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages

    As for women under Lenin’s rule it was easier to get a divorce and an abortion but Stalin changed all this by making divorce illegal in 1936 to protect motherhood and childhood. Despite this he still opened up more opportunities for women by allowing them to work in factories and he actually made it easier for women to work as he opened up child-care centres. As for the education system which had a major impact on the modernisation of Russia, Stalin made education compulsory as every child was allowed to have at least 9 years of free education which increased literacy rates. This was because Stalin wanted to be valued as the ‘father of the people’ and although he was feared he wanted to gain the loyalty of the youth and to do so he emphasised…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Boris Groys. The Total Art of Stalinism: Avant-Garde, Aesthetic Dictatorship, and Beyond. Translated by Charles Rougle. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1992. 126 pp., $13.49 (paper).…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    George Orwell 1984 Essay

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stalin, once in power, demonstrated a more complete power of the lives of the inhabitants of the USSR than Hitler did. “The state’s control of the media was total. Those who attempted to listen, read etc. anything else were severely punished” (Life in the USSR). For those who disobeyed, the labor camps they would face.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To the Soviet’s, Stalin was known to be a “hero” until the Khrushchev’s hidden speech to the Party Congress was denounced (“Joseph Stalin”). During Stalin’s reign, he was responsible for the death of twenty million people (History.com Staff). Stalin’s success in the Soviet Union was the characterization Lenin had always thought of him: “cruel and narrow minded” (Scheffer). Joseph Stalin was an intelligent man who was one of the most successful leaders in Europe. He ruled by terror as a leader in the Soviet Union and was responsible for millions of deaths.…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some historians like James von Geldern (2005) “The idealized figure of Stalin represented in mass culture also spoke to a perceived need for vigorous leadership in Soviet society. Thus Stalin often appeared in a magnetic aura of charisma that went far beyond his political role, leaving many of the Soviet citizens lucky enough to meet him mesmerized. ”2 have described the cult surrounding Stalin as one of the most perfect ever invented, certainly on such a massive scale, and among his efforts was a significant rewriting of Russian history that aimed to establish him as a much more important player during the revolution than had been the case, although he had certainly been influential. After his death, his successor Nikita Khrushchev argued that Stalin's cult of personality was contrary to the spirit of Marxism-Leninism and had gone too far towards the elevation of Stalin to the role of a virtual superhuman. This supports the argument that through the use of propaganda, Staling was able to achieve almost a god-like persona, which is another one of his great…

    • 4018 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stalin was the dictator of the soviet union (1878- 1953). Under the control of Stalin the soviet union went from a weak and peasant society to a military superpower. He would send his enemies to labor camps, or he would have them executed. He had millions of people killed and some were sent to labor camps. While he was under control his name became part of the soviet anthem.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Joseph Stalin started off as a decent leader, but then he got power-hungry and when people started to not comply with his rules and laws, he would have them killed… .This hunger for power and control eventually turned his leadership into more of a dictatorship. Once Stalin started to become more of a dictator, the whole union started to fall apart. The USSR/Soviet Union (whatever you want to call it), is almost as if it followed the script to Animal Farm, which is funny because Animal Farm was published 40 years before the Stalin…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Vladimir Lenin's Life

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In 1917, Russia went through the most drastic political change in the country’s history. The Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin, over threw Czar Nicholas II, whose family had been in control of Russia for over 300 years. After the Bolsheviks took power, Vladimir Lenin began to rebuild Russia. His focus was primarily in the political and economic spheres of Russian Life. Lenin did not place much of an importance on the cultural sphere of Russian life.…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Historical Characteristics To start off China and Russia are two of the most biggest land masses in the world. China’s land mass is approximately 3,706,386 square miles, with Russia being the winner with 6,593,000 square miles with both being in the Asia. China for centuries as a top leading civilization, outpacing all of the rest of the world in sciences, and art, but during the 19th century the country was best by civil unrest, with major famines and military defeats. After World war 2, Mao redoing established an autocratic community system, that imposed strict controls over life, and consequently cost the lives of tens of millions of peoples. After the Korean war in June of 1950, China led a huge commit bloc supporting North Korea.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Disintegration of the USSR happened mainly because the late Soviet leadership renounced the very forces that forged the Soviet empire and that propped up Bolshevik government’s modus operandi since its inception. In 1917, the yoke of repression was heated by Lenin, and through 1953 cooked by Stalin in complete totalitarian fashion. Gorbachev, however, resolved to govern differently not realizing the policy contradictions that would ultimately lead to USSR’s demise. If Gorbachev were the same person as Lenin or Stalin, the Soviet Union could have remained intact for a little longer, but certainly not indefinitely given the status quo, as other factors played a role. Above all, however, Gorbachev was not a personalist leader, and so he was unable to exert tight control over his state and people as his predecessors had.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays