Foucauldian Theory Essay

How believable would it be if someone claimed that most of what we know about power and order, is based off of either pre-Benthamist, Benthamist, and Foucauldian views? And to what degree is the panopticon idea true to our modern day society? Pre-Benthamist view involves physical torture or simply being an attraction for others in a shaming type of way, and over all the instilment of terror. Benthamist, is more directed to controlling of the space and time over others, and Foucauldian basis its self on surveillance. Which means people can be both prisoner and guard at the same time. It may not even seem that these definitions fit anywhere in our supposed society of western culture. The panoptic ideals will tie into everything along the way. But …show more content…
Becoming a part of a children’s ministry is not like a walk in the park, it is much more difficult than anyone may believe. Once the person decides they wish to be a part of it, it is like signing your life away, but for a good purpose. With all that aside, the point is, once someone puts themselves in that position, you are subjected to being a part of a Foucauldian way of life. The way that comes into works is by the automatic functioning of power because once the person feels they are being consistently watched, they do more right than wrong and that goes to show that being punished is not their plans. In the children’s ministry there so many guidelines and rules that must be followed or else there will be consequences the person will have to comply to in the end. An example of surveillance is through social media, in the way that once you become a volunteer all the leaders begin to add you to their social sites. In an obvious way, one cannot deny them the access because it can bring up doubts or questioning as to what is being hidden if the leaders are not added on. As soon as they can see everything posted on the persons’