In his analysis of Heart of Darkness, critic Andrew Roberts exposes Conrad’s environment. Roberts argues that Marlow’s – and Conrad’s – sexism stems from the entirely patriarchal European world of which both author and character were products. Men were the sole occupiers of positions of power in this culture, and thus Roberts comments, “…a whole matrix of inter-male relationships involving competitiveness, desire, bonding, the sharing and appropriation of power and knowledge...functioned in [this] Western society” (Roberts 458). To maintain this system, women are used as sexual scapegoats by men and revered as a “shared 5 desire” or common goal. As a result, women are prohibited from attaining “positions of power, knowledge and desire.” Due to this domineering social construct, the women of Heart of Darkness are shown as hopelessly weak, helplessly ignorant, and irreversibly subservient to
In his analysis of Heart of Darkness, critic Andrew Roberts exposes Conrad’s environment. Roberts argues that Marlow’s – and Conrad’s – sexism stems from the entirely patriarchal European world of which both author and character were products. Men were the sole occupiers of positions of power in this culture, and thus Roberts comments, “…a whole matrix of inter-male relationships involving competitiveness, desire, bonding, the sharing and appropriation of power and knowledge...functioned in [this] Western society” (Roberts 458). To maintain this system, women are used as sexual scapegoats by men and revered as a “shared 5 desire” or common goal. As a result, women are prohibited from attaining “positions of power, knowledge and desire.” Due to this domineering social construct, the women of Heart of Darkness are shown as hopelessly weak, helplessly ignorant, and irreversibly subservient to