Analysis Of Jack Weatherford's Genghis Khan And The Making Of The Modern World

Improved Essays
In Jack Weatherford’s Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World, Weatherford explains Genghis Khan’s rise to power, the conquests he made throughout his lifetime, and the legacy he created, which surged the world into the modern era. Weatherford argues that the creation of the society and the world as we know it was due to the work of this one man, Genghis Khan. Weatherford brings to light the previously unknown history of Genghis Khan’s life that led him to great success in creating an empire, which spanned over 11 million square miles in Asia and Europe. He seeks to disprove the modern belief that Genghis Khan was a bloodthirsty barbarian “who enjoyed destruction for its own sake” (xxvi). Weatherford uses his book as an exposé on the life of Genghis Khan, arguing that he is responsible for the …show more content…
Genghis Khan built a great empire despite the adversity and challenges he faced throughout his life. Weatherford successfully depicts the life of Genghis Khan, stating that the major outcome of his empire was the “unprecedented rise in cultural communication, expanded trade, and improved civilization” (xxiii). He argues that Genghis Khan’s various conquests and battles resulted in unification of nations, and a bringing together of the world through trade and various forms of communication. Weatherford’s argument has a minute number of shortcomings. He provides a thorough description of the events that occur in the Secret History. Weatherford states that his story is told “without recounting any more of the … ailments encountered, nor the personality quirks of the researchers and the people we met along the way” (xxxv). His description is given without bias, it is merely a summation of the facts surrounding the history of Genghis Khan. The only flaws in the account are due to lack of information or vague information given in the Secret History. (xvi, xxiii, xxxv,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I believe that the Mongols were barbaric and very destructive and unforgiving people. Although they were barbaric, they united Eurasia and spread ideas and were very intelligent. One reason why they were barbaric is how they ruled in battle. While they were in battle, the Mongols had one person in charge of 10 warriors and then one person in charge of 10 of those groups of ten (100) and then ten of those ten (1000) and genghis would tell only a few people what to do and it would be a chain reaction of how the orders went around to everyone. If only a few people flee from battle out of a ten person group, the whole entire group is sIaughtered.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mongols Dbq Analysis

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Have you ever wanted to know how the Mongols treated others? Well I have. They organized their army in groups, left marks of what they did, and they took the men and the women to help them against others. The Mongols are sometimes peaceable but they are primarily brutal.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mongols Dbq Analysis

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Mongols sophisticated military tactics, organized ethical and religious codes, their economic contributions, and road systems are tributes to the fact that they are not barbarians. The Mongols had displayed organized military strategies to aid their conquests that can only be achieved by intelligent and well thought out planning. Planning such as surrounding their enemy and attacking their fortresses from all sides; this cornered their enemies and allowed for easy attack. The Mongolians also had tactics like placing dummies on horses to give the impression that a great crowd of ready to fight men were assembled at the battle ground. ( Doc 3)…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After they conquered most of the known world and built their own empire, Mongols were known to be two things when it comes to history: great conquerors and barbarians. In terms of the former, no literature can contest that they deserved to be called and regarded as such. Inversely, the case of the latter remains an open debate to historians and even the rest of the world. This paper aims to arrive to a verdict whether the term barbarian is fitting to the Mongols or not. During the time when they were tearing down cities after cities and kingdoms after kingdoms, the Mongols were stereotyped and feared as ruthless vanquishers with barbaric nature.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Genghis Khan Dbq

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1162, Temujin was born in the Mongolian Steppes. Before the unification of the Mongols under Genghis Khan’s rule in 1221, the Mongol people travelled together in kinship groups, only joining forces when they needed to attack a common enemy. It wasn’t until 1200 when Temujin decided to unify all Mongol clans under his rule. Once he defeated all his rivals, he took the title of Genghis Khan in 1206. He soon would be the founder of the Mongol Empire, becoming the ruler of one the largest empires in history.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He wrote "The new technology, knowledge, and commercial wealth created the Renaissance in which Europe rediscovered some of its prior culture, but more importantly, absorbed the technology for printing, firearms, the compass, and the abacus from the East… the Mongols succeeded not merely from martial superiority; rather “they have succeeded by means of science” and “devote their leisure time to the principles of philosophy... Seemingly every aspect of European life changed during the Renaissance as a result of Mongol influence.” (p. xxiv) Weatherford 's main purpose for writing this book is so that modern day inquirers can delve into the world during the time of Genghis Khan and see him and in a new light. He strived to show, that although the Mongols were eager for war, they valued intellect and were pioneers in the modernization of the world around…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mongol Empire Dbq Essay

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Mongols created the largest empire in all of history. The land they had conquered is more than two times that of the next greatest conqueror, Alexander the Great. But unlike Alexander, who is often remembered as a hero, the legacy of the Mongols is one of brutality and barbarism. But in truth, these so-called “barbarians” were, in fact, not very barbaric at all. Recent discoveries challenged the long-accepted statement of Mongols being savage brutes, suggesting that they were perhaps wrongly labelled; the facts about them were twisted and lost to history.…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mongol Culture

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages

    History is outlined by the legacies of several rigidly characterized groups. One such group is the Mongols, a nomadic tribe notorious for both their alleged depravity and despotic founder, Genghis Khan. However, much of this legacy was founded on myth, as opposed to true barbarism. By definition, in order to be civilized, a group must be intellectually, culturally, socially, and materially advanced in human society. To this end, through their military tactics, religious tolerance, encouragement of the arts, legal system, hospitality, infrastructure, and trade, the civilized nature of the Mongols far outweighs their unfounded legacy of barbarism and brutality.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DBQ: How Barbaric were the "Barbarians"? Although Mongols were strikingly ruthless through their military tactics (Doc. 2, 3,4,5), they were able to develop a rather sophisticated society (Doc. 7, 9, 10) and executed noteworthy and structured accomplishments (Doc. 1, 6, 8). As shown in documents 2, 3, 4, and 5, the Mongolians are quite infamous for their questionable harshness considering their military techniques.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols and the Europeans had many characteristics that were similar and characteristics that set them apart. They both had strong attributes that set them apart from any other group of people; they were powerful in their own way. It was the Mongols during the third wave civilizations era that created the largest and influential empire of that millennium. Their empire reached all the way to Eastern Europe and it was the Mongols that brought regions together into a single interacting network. The Comparing and contrasting of two expansive cultures will provide us with a better understand of how their connection pushed us into the global integration of the modern era.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols were horse riding people that began gaining power in 1130 A.D and their empire collapsed in late 1368 A.D. They were known for their warfare methods, which were extremely unique at the time because they rode on horseback and completely destroyed every surrounding civilization they went into war with. The Mongols were also known for having one of the most iniquitous rulers of all time, Genghis Khan. Genghis Khan then passed the empire on to his grandson, Kublai Khan. Throughout this paper I will be discussing how the Mongol Empire was founded, how their education system worked, daily life, housing, how horses became such a big part of the Mongol Empire, Genghis Khan being in power, warfare for the Mongols, passing the empire on to Kublai Khan, and contributing factors of the empire ending in 1368.…

    • 1938 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    With his extraordinary military accomplishments and leadership skills, Genghis Khan was a warrior and ruler who united all the nomadic tribes in the steppe of Mongolia and built the largest land empire in the world in the thirteenth century. He left a great legacy through his innovative ideas and laws whilst also promoting religious freedom, allowing an exchange of the global economy between Asia and Europe (Weatherford). However, with a belief that there should be only one ruler under the sky, Genghis Khan was unlikely to forgive those who refused to join forces with him and vanquished millions who wanted to create empires of their own. This presented an image of him and the Mongols as brutal savages who eliminated entire cultures, devastated…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mongol Crash Course Essay

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. List the four characteristics of herding/nomadic groups brought up in the Crash Course Video. ­ They aren’t Jack Kerouac, they don’t produce manufactured goods, they live close to nature and harsh conditions, and they are more egalitarian. Complete the following chart: What Why Migration They move around according to the weather.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Power is the defining force in The Epic of Gilgamesh, but power comes in varying forms. In this essay, I will discuss the emphasis of power, how power is obtained, and the distinction of power in male and female characters and through this, it’s evident male power dominates due to Gilgamesh’s power as a king and his ability to defeat a god. The importance of power is what drives the tale of Gilgamesh. His desire for control over the people outside and within his country leads Gilgamesh on his heroic journey. Along the way, Gilgamesh meets others who rival Gilgamesh’s power.…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mongol History: Ariq Boke

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Ariq Boke normally can be viewed as a questionable figure in Mongol history. Often times he is portrayed negatively through the primary sources of his era, especially those of Rashid Al-Din. However, despite his controversial background, Ariq Boke was an important figure in the Mongol empire because he represented the opposing internal conflicts of the Mongol imperium, as well as demonstrated the turbulence of the time. Generally, the inevitable war between Ariq Boke and his older brother Khubulai, is normally viewed as a struggle for succession, and additionally exemplifies physical confrontation between nomadic and settled life. And although Khubulai managed to defeat Ariq Boke, it is evident that Ariq Boke was the better of the two successors.…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics