Freedom And Joy The Buddha And Maude Analysis

Improved Essays
A. Influences on scientists and publishers---they are very human

B. Global warming or natural variability?

C. Uses and abuses of science---thoughts of many people

D. Dancing Reality---Our human interface

E. Wisdom and Folly---from around the world and across the ages

F. Freedom and Joy---The Buddha and Maude

My ambition is to say in ten sentences what everyone else says in a book - what everyone else does not say in a book.

Friedrich Nietzsche

Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.

Leonardo da Vinci

Science is the most valid source of information about humans and planet earth. It has also provided wonderful gifts such as longer, healthier lives, and machines that keep us creative and amused. But best be aware of the influences
…show more content…
At stake are careers, departmental funds and perks, friendships, and journal publications. And best of all you get to go on all those expense paid trips to Zurich and Hawaii to present your paper, the one that so beautifully supports the current paradigm.

Political agendas and Noble Causes.

Scientists have just as firm commitment to causes and ideologies as anyone. Even the most honest and intelligent cannot avoid their research being affected. How much depends upon how honest and how intelligent they are. If you want to optimize your career it would be best not to be too honest or too intelligent.

Funding source.

Science used to be the search for truth, now it's the search for grant money. The greatest fear of a research scientist is loss of funding. Research depends upon a steady flow of money. And that steady flow of money usually depends upon the steady flow of research findings that support the biases of the funding source. Especially vulnerable are scientists doing research with political, financial or ideological implications.

Publisher constraints.

a. Few journals publish negative results. Why make enemies.

b. There is very little replication. No funds, no glory, and no friends.

c. Peer review is usually pal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In a similar fashion, Will Rodman contradicts nature by perfecting the drug ALZ-112 which fixes Alzheimer's by attacking the genes of host cells with a retrovirus. However, the study of Alzheimer's has more potential for good than reanimating life does (because curing Alzheimer's displays more realistic potential and a higher likelihood to help a large audience of people). But, Rodman still crosses the fine line that determines science does too much when he starts to treat his specimens like inanimate objects and conducts mediocre science. Rodman turns the world into his personal game of chess where he controls what happens, when he wants it, and where he wants it. Rodman's game of chess parallels Frankenstein raping nature as he too digs into…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Surgeries to enhance intelligence, steroids to make super soldiers, cloning human cells, recreating organs, bionic eyes, when are we going to stop. In “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes, the main character Charlie Gordon, has a mental disability that makes his income of knowledge slower than most people. He undergoes a surgery that makes him smarter but in the end it leads to his death. There are many procedures in life that are similar to the procedure done in the story that exist and could potentially lead to disastrous outcomes. Science should not be used to advance human abilities because it is not cost effective and it is harmful to the patient.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Curiosity Killed The Cat! (Close Reading for Frankenstein) Mary Shelly’s gothic novel explicates how the thirst of excessive knowledge and curiosity combined can lead to the demise of the person, not only the person, but the whole society can be put in danger as well. The attainment of a limited amount of knowledge is not considered to be perilous; however if the limits are crossed anything can happen. According to Frankenstein, Victor’s curiosity of perceiving excessive knowledge results in the demise of his entire family, including him and his ostensible son, the monster.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Artificial Uterus is a documentary about the emerging science of exogenesis. In addition to current limitations of exogenesis, the films addresses some of the ethical objections to the technology. From the documentary it is clear that scientists must consider the ethics before developing technology, as developed technology will be exploited in ways outside the scientists’ intentions. The pursuit of discovery is usually regarded as positive motivation for research, but most people agree not all technology benefits society.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout our history we’ve evolved with science and technology and it has taken us to great heights. But haven’t there been times where we’ve taken science too far? That’s what took place in the book “Frankenstein” by Mary Shelley. Victor Frankenstein took science too far and as a result had negative outcomes that would result in his death. Another event that is similar to this would be the creation of the Atomic Bomb which also resulted in negative outcomes that would lead to horrible deaths.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mortification In Sport

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Science, or scientific research, is a collection of data that is recorded and then analyzed to answer a question or prove a theory. Science can be used to explain unknown phenomena or redefine a previous assumption. There are several elements of scientific research. The elements are as follows: public, objective, empirical, systematic, cumulative, predictive, and self-correcting. Together these elements create the guidelines of scientific research.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    \Science has helped archaeologists and historians reconstruct the past. Many new technology has helped date artefacts, how those artefacts were made and show how past life organisms looked like. Science has played the biggest role in order to preserve the relics from the past. It is hard to preserve the relics and to study, examples of this includes the shroud of Turin which can only be taken out of containment once in a couple of years and Ötzi the ice man has to constantly be sprayed with water when it is out for studying…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rotblat Human Values

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the article “Science and Human Values,” Joseph Rotblat advocates that scientists should be extremely concerned with the ethical consequences of their work. He maintains the belief that while the purpose of science is to expand human knowledge, it is critical that the general public understands that scientific research has much to do with the welfare of individuals and state politics. However, an analysis of this article will reveal that the ethical responsibility that scientists have should not deter them from their quest to expand our understanding of the universe. When examining “Science and Human Values,” it is critical that the level of practicality should be considered when suggesting ways to ensure scientists truly understand their…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethics In Oryx And Crake

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages

    While the definition of ethics may be different in the eyes of different people, most individuals have a certain limit to their behaviour. An exception to this statement is none other than one of the main characters in the novel, Crake. In Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake, Crake is a character who has a bright, young mind in his earlier years, but seems to have a gradually increasing obsession with his idea of perfectionism as the years go by. Over many years, Crake realizes that there are many qualities about the human race that he finds to be negative. Crake feels the need to do something about this, which is why he decides to work on a project that he feels would benefit humanity, but actually causes destruction.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is important to skeptical in science as well as in art. Although Leonardo has a secular attitude towards art and science, he understands the role of art in both science and the secular world. Unique social political and social influence caused Leonardo to combine science and art. It is however necessary to have a different view about science. There was a powerful and superb sense of self in Rome that makes art more than mere decorations.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Plato, science can only provide opinions, not knowledge. We all know that there are many types of sciences, different ranks of them and also theories and concepts. Plato focused specifically on Astronomy, he believed the earth as a spherical one. Today we can see different value systems, whether the people are religious or not some type of science is agreeable and disagreeable. Moreover, the ones who practice science and have studied, have a sense of “knowledge;” for them at least.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Richard Dawkins and John Lennox recently had a lively debate over what is arguably the most important questions of recent times. The following points formed the main arguments of each person's stand point. 1. RICHARD DAWKINS' MAIN ARGUMENTS [1] Dawkins says that he cannot comprehend that God, who can do anything, couldn't find a better way to forgive sin than to have Himself tortured and killed. He stated that believing in the resurrection of Christ was "petty and small-minded", because it goes against every law of science.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Science is capable of explaining and verifying many things, but it cannot explain or verify everything. The word “science” comes from the Latin word “scientia” which means “knowledge”. Science is the knowledge and study of facts in the natural world and the process of experimenting and observing the facts in order to draw generalized conclusions. Science is made up of the knowledge revealed to and discovered by mankind. This is why science cannot prove everything, because we do not know everything; scientist do not have all the answers they are simply guessing.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deception in Scientific Studies Science is one of those subjects that almost everyone is fascinated by. I know I am. I love the idea of human effort to understand or to understand better of how things work in this world. People are constantly introduced to new studies almost every day from the Internet, magazines, social Medias, and so on.…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What does science mean to you? To me, science is everything. Not only is it the normal biology or psychology, it is everything that surrounds us, or is in us, even the things we ourselves do not know about. The Webster definition is “a system or method reconciling practical ends with scientific laws” which for me that definition encompasses everything we know and learn every day.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays