Francisco Franco VS Harry S. Truman.
Why I chose these leaders. I chose these leaders for various reasons. I chose Franco because I am Spanish and have never learnt about him in any of the schools I have been to, he is a leader that has always fascinated me as my grandparents lived during his reign, and my parents were born during his reign. All my family members have mixed opinions on him, and it made me curious. As for Harry S. Truman, I chose him as I wanted a democratic leader with moderate fame, but I also had not much idea about how his time as POTUS was. How they came to power. Francisco Franco and Harry S. Truman both rose to power through different means and in different political settings. After the Spanish Civil War, which lasted …show more content…
“A combination of factors can be used to explain the success of Franco and the nationalists in overcoming the second republic and installing a permanent dictatorship in 1939.” Upheld by the Patriot group, Franco's tactical ability and tyrant philosophy permitted him to lay out a tyranny that went on until his passing in 1975. Conversely, Harry S. Truman turned into the 33rd Leader of the US in 1945 after the unexpected end of Franklin D. Roosevelt. Truman, beforehand filling in as VP, expected office during the last phases of The Second Great War and was confronted with the difficulties of post-war reproduction and the arising Cold Conflict. Truman's ascent to control followed established progression instead of a progressive or strategic defeat. While Franco's rise was set apart by a savage clash and the solidification of tyrannical control, Truman's change to the administration was a quiet exchange of force inside the structure of a majority-ruled administration. The economy. During Francisco Franco's reign in Spain, which endured from 1939 to 1975, the nation encountered a time of austerity and confinement from the worldwide economy. Franco executed protectionist arrangements, underlining
Why I chose these leaders. I chose these leaders for various reasons. I chose Franco because I am Spanish and have never learnt about him in any of the schools I have been to, he is a leader that has always fascinated me as my grandparents lived during his reign, and my parents were born during his reign. All my family members have mixed opinions on him, and it made me curious. As for Harry S. Truman, I chose him as I wanted a democratic leader with moderate fame, but I also had not much idea about how his time as POTUS was. How they came to power. Francisco Franco and Harry S. Truman both rose to power through different means and in different political settings. After the Spanish Civil War, which lasted …show more content…
“A combination of factors can be used to explain the success of Franco and the nationalists in overcoming the second republic and installing a permanent dictatorship in 1939.” Upheld by the Patriot group, Franco's tactical ability and tyrant philosophy permitted him to lay out a tyranny that went on until his passing in 1975. Conversely, Harry S. Truman turned into the 33rd Leader of the US in 1945 after the unexpected end of Franklin D. Roosevelt. Truman, beforehand filling in as VP, expected office during the last phases of The Second Great War and was confronted with the difficulties of post-war reproduction and the arising Cold Conflict. Truman's ascent to control followed established progression instead of a progressive or strategic defeat. While Franco's rise was set apart by a savage clash and the solidification of tyrannical control, Truman's change to the administration was a quiet exchange of force inside the structure of a majority-ruled administration. The economy. During Francisco Franco's reign in Spain, which endured from 1939 to 1975, the nation encountered a time of austerity and confinement from the worldwide economy. Franco executed protectionist arrangements, underlining