Pros And Cons Of Edward Snowden

Improved Essays
Edward Snowden, Civil Disobedience, and the “Greater Good”
The revelations brought forth by Edward Snowden have redefined the public perception of privacy in the modern era. After the publication of Glenn Greenwald’s articles in June 2013, the idea of mass surveillance has evolved from a figment of dystopian literature into a tangible reality. Ever since that original exposé in the Guardian, the debate over the whether or not Snowden was justified has been divisive. Some hail Snowden as a whistleblower, a hero who uprooted his own life in order to reveal necessary information into the public domain. Others denounce him as an arrogant, attention-seeking traitor, who compromised the security of his own country for personal attention and accolade.
…show more content…
According to author and philosopher Henry David Thoreau, the only way for a man to remain truly just is if he prioritizes his own morals over restrictions prescribed by the law. Therefore, civil disobedience stems from an individual violating a law he or she perceives as unjust. “Law never made men a whit more just,” wrote Thoreau, “and, by means of their respect for it, even the well‐disposed are daily made the agents of injustice.” Thoreau believed that those who respect the law indiscriminately simply because it is the law are more likely to achieve unjust ends because they don’t examine whether or not the law itself is just. Those who believe that Snowden was unjustified simply because he “broke the law” are subscribing to the same ideology that Thoreau condemns in that particular quote. Philosophers like Immanuel Kant, who, in his essay, Metaphysics of Morals, espoused the separation between legality and morality, would agree that just because something is illegal doesn’t mean it’s implicitly unjust. Thoreau, however, went even further and said: “If [the injustice] is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law,” implying that if eradicating a particularly heinous injustice requires a person to break the law they should do

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Article #1: Sinha, G. Alex. " NSA surveillance since 9/11 and the human right to privacy." Loyola Law ReviewWinter 2013: 861+. Academic OneFile. Web.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So, why wouldn’t we give them the permission to do so? My answer to your questions may have sided with both opinions throughout the essay, but I have a clear understanding of why both sides feel the way that they do. I would say that Snowden may not be a national hero, but a guy that will change the way that the government acknowledges some’s issues with invasion of their privacy. He was a person that shined a light on something that most Americans had no idea was happening – that was his contribution. Perhaps the government will decide to take actions to ensure Americans that searching is the only - ergo best - option we currently have to solve an ongoing issue we are facing.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Who, What, When, Where and Why am I Being Watched In George Orwell’s 1984 and Phillip K. Dick’s “Minority Report” the governments are obsessed with surveillance of their people in order to keep their control over their citizens. Thus their citizen’s privacy suffered to the point where it is nonexistent. With the assistance of technology, the governments are able to keep citizens oppressed and Orwell and Dick openly express their negative views on government surveillance. 1984 is a story written in the 1940s that shows what England would look in a totalitarian government.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    NSA employee Edward Snowden made headlines worldwide when he defied government confidentiality laws to protect everyday citizens from losing the privacy promised to them under the Fourth Amendment (The New Yorker, 2013). In both these instances, civil disobedience was able to do something that blatant violence never could: open an honest dialogue about the state of our…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thoreau hits the extreme in convicting the government of using ‘black arts’ to create quasi-men, or men to follow laws unquestioningly (77). However, Thoreau mainly wrote this passage for people who submit only parts of their humanity to the whims of the majority. He says even this is to be avoided. Since people already have the moral decision-making ability, they do not need law to advise them on these issues. This is why Thoreau says “law never made men a whit more just (77).…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thoreau says in his text, “Unjust laws exist; shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress them at once?” (Thoreau 81). He is stating the argument that if a person finds a certain law to be unjust, they should not obey that law but instead go beyond the bounds of it and not obey it. He thinks that one should do what is right rather than respect for the law. Which contradicts itself because the law is a law for a reason and we as a society trust that what the laws are, are best for our wellbeing.…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this next section Martin Luther King Jr. makes the argument that some laws meant to be broken; to do so he, defines just and unjust laws and also provides proper examples. King defines just law as “a man-made code that squares with the moral law;” it is a law that is equally upheld by both majority and minority groups (804). He goes on to define unjust laws as “any law that degrades human personality” (804). By accurately defining the difference between just and unjust laws, it sets up the tone for his argument on why it is acceptable to support some laws and disobey others. He wishes to convey the idea that just because a law is put in place by a government, that does not always deem them reasonable and without corruption.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The creation of the Department of Homeland Security and establishment of the US Patriot Act was a result of the understanding that in order to have freedom, certain aspects of daily life would have to change. One aspect of change has been law enforcement’s move towards militarization, evolving from basic military like organizational structure to changes in uniform colors, equipment and vehicles. Citizens see this evolution as a “police vs citizens” stance rather than community oriented policing. The other and more clandestine policing problem has been the National Security Agency (NSA) and its domestic surveillance. While domestic surveillance is said to provide valuable evidence to prevent terrorism, it has resulted in whistleblowers like Edward Snowden leaking classified information exposing the extent of the surveillance and the infringement on personal privacy.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Former president of the United States, Thomas Jefferson, once said, “If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so.” Wholeheartedly, I stand in affirmation that peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society, if peaceful resistance were still to exist. Unfortunately, it does not.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anyone can recognize when a law is unjust - but can they be brave enough to face the consequences if they choose to protest that law? Should they? Henry David Thoreau, “Civil Disobedience” critiques that citizens must protest a law that is unjust, and his own experiences and methods for protest, and Martin Luther King Jr’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” where he speaks of his approach to protesting against unjust laws, even if it lands him in jail. Both philosophers regarding on their answers on this question shows that they are both willing to protest and face the consequences for it, but they differ in their ideas of solutions. King’s perspective on breaking unjust laws is that it is necessary to do it to give an oppressed group the opportunity…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Citizenfour Throughout the world, the government scrutinizes citizens without them knowing about it. Devices such as computers and cellphones are being hacked by the NSA and used to monitor everyone’s actions. The documentary, Citizenfour, reveals how the government has expanded its surveillance methods. The government’s secrecy of spying on peoples lives not only declines individual’s privacy, but their freedom as well.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    National security vs personal privacy has been a hot topic post-9/11. President Obama gave a speech on January 17, 2014 where he stated “in our rush to respond …. , the risk of government overreach – the possibility that we lose some of our core liberties in pursuit of security – also became more pronounced.” (Office of the Press Secretary) Due to the tragic event on September 11th, 2001, our government was placed under extraordinary pressures to find the terrorists and bring them to justice using whatever means possible. This brings around questions regarding ethical dilemmas as they relate to security and our right to privacy.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Resistance to any law should only be brought about by morally supported means. To fight any law without being humane and dignified both insults and circumvents the boundaries free society has in place to ensure tyrannical laws are not maintained. Resistance must have a strong actionable cause, one that is clear, precise, and easy to join. This means a positive impact can be presumed, so long as any such…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Why Privacy Matters

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Assignment Submitted By Yours Name here Submitted To Yours Instructor Name here To Meet the Needs of the Course Nov., 2015. For this rhetorical analysis task, I have selected the article which is titles as Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have Nothing to Hide, written by Daniel J. Solove.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Greenwald also sates “Taken in its entirely, the Snowden archive led to an ultimately simple conclusion: the US government has built a system that has as its goals the complete elimination of electronic privacy worldwide. ”(94) The government is taking away the privacy of every individual by checking everyone’s cell phones emails and…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays