King Lear is widely regarded as Shakespeare’s most intense and powerful tragedy. The bleakness of a Jacobean tragedy takes an embodiment in King Lear. The parallels and juxtapositions between the play’s main plot, and subplot combined with its tragic end, has made Shakespeare’s version of King Lear famous for centuries. Since its conception King Lear has befuddled audiences and readers alike with its seemingly messy plot that raises more questions than it answers. In this essay, I will, with a starting point in a passage from Act 5, scene 3 discuss justice, fate and what it means to be human in King Lear by William Shakespeare. A central issue in the long tradition of literary tragedies is divine justice, and the problems that derive
…show more content…
Had Gloucester not been blind towards the truth concerning his sons, and had he not “stumbled when I saw,” then perhaps Edmund never would have been able to set his plan in motion. However, here Gloucester’s hamartia comes into play, namely that even when he could see, he was blind. As with Lear, it is not until he loses his sight that he truly sees, which can be noticed in Act 4, scene 5 when Gloucester says: “Methinks y’are better spoken” to Edgar disguised as Tom. Furthermore, one central question is repeatedly raised during the course of the play, namely what are human beings, basically?
King Lear explores what it means to be human, and are we made human by social amenities?
Throughout the play, Shakespeare never answers the question of what makes us human, instead he gives the audience material to solve it themselves. One example is in Act 3, scene 4 when Lear says: “Unaccommodated man is no more but such a poor, bare, forked animal…” here we can note, how according to Shakespeare humans released from civilization is no more than a two-legged …show more content…
If we are made human through civilization is goodness, then natural, or is it just a part of what we are been taught?
Edmund challenges the notion of humanism when he says “[A]s if some universal power pushed us into evil deeds… I would have been what I am even if the most virginal star in heavens had twinkled at my conception.” In this soliloquy Edmund clearly disputes the idea that his life is controlled by any outside force, he makes it astoundingly clear that he himself decided to be evil, and therefore in Edmund’s mind, being evil is a choice. In the end of the play, Edmund, Goneril and Regan’s plan fails, because the wheel of fortune limits one’s ambition, and as such, you can only rise so high before you will fall. Right before Edmund dies, he realizes that he failed by saying “the wheel has come full circle,” here Edmund shows that he is aware of the fact that he reached too far, and as a consequence, he pays with his
Had Gloucester not been blind towards the truth concerning his sons, and had he not “stumbled when I saw,” then perhaps Edmund never would have been able to set his plan in motion. However, here Gloucester’s hamartia comes into play, namely that even when he could see, he was blind. As with Lear, it is not until he loses his sight that he truly sees, which can be noticed in Act 4, scene 5 when Gloucester says: “Methinks y’are better spoken” to Edgar disguised as Tom. Furthermore, one central question is repeatedly raised during the course of the play, namely what are human beings, basically?
King Lear explores what it means to be human, and are we made human by social amenities?
Throughout the play, Shakespeare never answers the question of what makes us human, instead he gives the audience material to solve it themselves. One example is in Act 3, scene 4 when Lear says: “Unaccommodated man is no more but such a poor, bare, forked animal…” here we can note, how according to Shakespeare humans released from civilization is no more than a two-legged …show more content…
If we are made human through civilization is goodness, then natural, or is it just a part of what we are been taught?
Edmund challenges the notion of humanism when he says “[A]s if some universal power pushed us into evil deeds… I would have been what I am even if the most virginal star in heavens had twinkled at my conception.” In this soliloquy Edmund clearly disputes the idea that his life is controlled by any outside force, he makes it astoundingly clear that he himself decided to be evil, and therefore in Edmund’s mind, being evil is a choice. In the end of the play, Edmund, Goneril and Regan’s plan fails, because the wheel of fortune limits one’s ambition, and as such, you can only rise so high before you will fall. Right before Edmund dies, he realizes that he failed by saying “the wheel has come full circle,” here Edmund shows that he is aware of the fact that he reached too far, and as a consequence, he pays with his