Comparing The Court Case Of Tinker Vs. Des Moines And Miranda V. Arizona

Improved Essays
Throughout my reading and understanding of the court cases Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966) decided on during the Warren Court era, I have observed significant disagreements regarding the interpretation of American freedoms and the proper approach to law enforcement amongst the majority and dissenting Justices of the time.

It was held by the majority ruling in Tinker v. Des Moines that kids do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate. Tinker v Des Moines: "The students' freedom to symbolic speech was honored by the Court's decision in favor of those who displayed black armbands at school in protest of the Vietnam War. Writing for the majority, Justice Fortas explained
…show more content…
Arizona, challenging the majority's determination to establish Miranda rights. Justice Harlan's dissenting opinion raised questions regarding the real-world effects of the Miranda decision on police enforcement procedures. Justice Harlan stated that the majority's ruling could obstruct efficient criminal investigations and placed needless demands on law enforcement officers. He warned against judicial overreach in directing police practices, arguing that the Fifth Amendment already offered sufficient protections against forced confessions. Justice Harlan worries about how the majority's decision will affect law enforcement procedures in the real world. He claimed that the Miranda ruling would make it more difficult for police officers to investigate crimes and would place burdensome duties on them. The importance of autonomy for states and each state's right to establish its own criminal justice systems was underlined in Justice Clark's dissent. He maintained that the Miranda ruling by the majority violated state autonomy to establish their own guidelines for police questioning, “In this way we would not be acting in the dark nor in one full sweep changing the traditional rules of custodial interrogation which this Court has for so long recognized as a justifiable and proper tool in balancing individual rights against the rights of society...(Miranda v Arizona).” Justice Clark's worries about judicial overreach were mirrored in Justice White's dissent. He maintained that the Miranda ruling by the majority was an unjustified encroachment on the authority of legislative and law enforcement authorities. Justice White questioned whether Miranda rights were still necessary, arguing that coerced confessions could be prevented by the already-existing constitutional safeguards. He voiced doubts about the Miranda warnings' ability to accomplish

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Tinker v. Des Moines supreme court case was very tricky but at the end the result of it was that the school didn’t have the right to suspend the two kids. There are a couple of reasons why. They were exercising their rights, they also didn't cause distractions, and their argument was weak First of all, The Des Moines didn't have the right to suspend the students that wore the armbands. The argument that the dissent had was and should have been strong enough to win the jury’s anonymous vote. The argument had some strong points, one of the strongest was their constitutional rights.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Television shows and movies have depicted the scenario where a suspect is arrested and read their Miranda rights. The process of reading a suspect their rights appears to be critical before a suspect is handcuffed and placed into police custody. The podcast entitled Miranda v Arizona by the author South East Texas CJ (2015) highlights why reading suspects their rights is so important. Miranda V Arizona was a case involving a female victim who was restrained, kidnapped, and raped in the year of 1963 in Phoenix Arizona. The woman was released near her home.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In January of the following year Miranda’s lawyers submitted an argument saying his right to a counsel granted by the 6th amendment was violated by the phoenix police department. It was appealed to try the constitutionality of instances where the defendants were questioned “while in custody or otherwise deprived of freedom in any other significant way”. They argued that a uneducated man like Ernesto Miranda would not know his 5th amendment rights to not incriminate himself. They also argued that in Vignera. V. New York a petitioner made confessions to detectives without being informed about his rights to a attorney and council.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Case

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Pages

    On June 13, the court came to the decision on the Miranda vs. Arizona case saying that all suspects must be told what their rights are before they are arrested. On March 2, 1963, Ernesto Miranda was deliberatly interrogated after being arrested for robbery, rape, and kidnap. . However, he was not informed of his rights before being questioned and Miranda confessed to robbery, rape, and kidnap. Mentally unstable and alone, miranda was without an attorney at trial and the prosecution formed their case off of the fact that Miranda confessed earlier. Sentenced with 20-30 years in prison, Miranda tried to convince the Arizona Supreme Court that his confession was given unconstitutionally and it was unfair, but the punishment still remained.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This claim was questioned greatly and first went to the Arizona Supreme court, then proceeded to go to the US Supreme court. The ending decision of this case led to Ernesto Miranda receiving life in prison and the Miranda rights to be put in place in law enforcement. The supreme court case of Miranda vs Arizona is one of the most controversial court cases in American history but it is also one of the most celebrated because of the increase of civil rights for suspected criminals. Ernesto Miranda’s Arizona trial began on June 20th of 1963. Miranda went into the trail with the claim that the police officers who brought him in did not specify that he had the right to stay quiet, even at one point saying that the policemen, Officer Cooley and Young,…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine being arrested based on zero evidence to accuse you of a crime and at the very same time being forced to answer intimidating questions that could be used against you. Miranda v. Arizona is an iconic court case that created a large impact on racial discrimination and even how arrests would be made. It started in 1963 when Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Phoenix, Arizona. He was in custody for rape, kidnapping, and robbery. Ernesto Miranda appealed with the Arizona Supreme Court claiming that the police had unconstitutionally received his confessions.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1968 three students in Des Moines, Iowa, arrived at their separate schools wearing black armbands to protest United States involvement in the Vietnam war. A lawsuit filed on behalf of the students was eventually argued in the Supreme Court on November 12, 1968. Based on the analysis on the specifics of the Tinker v. Des Moines case and the arguments and principles outlined in the three sources, the argument of Justice Abe Fortas had a stronger viewpoint rather than Justice Hugo Black. Fortas gives multiple examples to justify why students should have the freedom of speech. He notes that students should be allowed to express themselves, so in the future they would be impacted to make the world a better place.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before Dickerson V. United States, the Supreme Court ruled on a significant case in history that established a police standard that we currently still used today. In the case of Miranda V. Arizona, Ernesto Miranda was a suspect in a kidnapping and rape case, where he was interrogated by police and confessed to the crimes. Miranda was not informed by the officers of his rights and signed a written statement admitting to the crimes and that he was aware of his rights. The Supreme Court overturned Miranda’s conviction because he was not informed by the police of his rights under the fifth amendment of the Constitution. They held that if police do not inform suspects of their rights while they are in police custody, statements made by the suspects may not be used against them later at their trials.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Brianda Lopez Douglas High School, Mr. Aguilar 11th Grade 3-6-16 2A Does Miranda v. Arizona Ensure Justice and Preserve Liberty? About fifty years ago, the United States came across a case that would impact law enforcement like never before. For those unaware, I am referring to the Miranda v. Arizona case. The case started off with Ernesto Miranda being convicted of kidnapping and raping an eighteen-year-old girl; he was then interrogated for two intense hours (Hughes).…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda vs. Arizona is one of the most crucial U.S. Supreme Court cases ever held in the United States. The case causes the Supreme Court to redefine law enforcement procedures before interrogations. The decision that was reached by the Supreme Court addressed four different cases involving custodial interrogations. All of these cases are similar in the fact that there was a custodial interrogation where the suspect was not properly informed of his constitutional rights to remain silent and have a presence of an attorney. Additionally, in all of the cases besides Stewart v. California, the conviction was affirmed without any belief that there was a violation of constitutional rights ("Facts and Case").…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His request to speak with his lawyer while being questioned by police was repeatedly denied. The Court held that the denial of Escobedo’s right to counsel contributed to his confession, making it invalid as evidence, emphasizing the importance of protecting the rights of individuals during police questioning (Doc 6). Similarly, in Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court established the famous “Miranda rights,” which require law enforcement officials to inform individuals of their constitutional rights before questioning them in police custody. This case involved Miranda, who confessed to a crime during police interrogation without being informed of his 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination. The Court ruled that Miranda’s confession was obtained in violation of his constitutional rights and established the now-familiar Miranda warning to protect individuals’ rights during police interrogation (Doc 7).…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages

    They concluded that defendants arrested under state law must be informed of their constitutional rights against self-incrimination and representation by an attorney before being interrogated when in police custody. Any statements made by defendants during a custodial interrogation in which the defendant has not been read his “Miranda Rights” are inadmissible in both state and federal courts. The Supreme Court dissenting opinion was outnumbered 5-4. Four justices voted in favor of the dissenting opinion: Justice Harlan, Justice Clark, Justice Stewart, and Justice White.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The United States of America justice system operates under the assurance of innocent until proven guilty, granting everyone the right to a fair trial and due process of law. The right to a fair trial is one of the many rights under the power of the constitution that protect and secure justice, freedom, and equality. All American citizens are guaranteed these rights under the constitution, whether they are consciously aware of it or not, as was supported under the supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona, which resulted in the creation of Miranda rights. Miranda rights are imperative in order for due process of law to be upheld, thus ensuring and accentuating liberty. Miranda v. Arizona (1966) was the supreme court case that redefined interactions…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Warren Court Era

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Still today, the Miranda law stands steadfast at the helm of the American Criminal Justice System. In 2000, the Supreme Court “strongly reaffirmed its landmark Miranda decision, which requires police to inform criminal suspects of their rights to remain silent and to be represented by an attorney during interrogation.” (“Miranda warnings upheld, Supreme Court says right now deeply rooted”) Groups targeted by law enforcement would never see the light of day if it were not for the laws set in place demanding equal treatment within criminal handlings. American society changed drastically as a result of court decisions like Miranda v. Arizona; safety and equality became a reality for many people…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He appealed his case all the way up to the Supreme Court, claiming that the confession had been obtained unconstitutionally. The Supreme Court ruled that the prosecution could not use Miranda’s confession as evidence because the police had not informed Miranda of his right to an attorney and his right against…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays