Breaching Experiment Examples

Improved Essays
To be able to conduct a breaching experiment they do require a small plan so you deliberate breaks a commonly accepted social norm. One of many advantages of this experiment is that it is easily conducted by anyone Breaches are characteristically low budget and do not require much time and planning to carry out. There are many examples of this experiment such as standing backwards in the elevator or ordering something not on the menu of a restaurant. The first step in conducting a breaching experiment is to identify a social norm to break.

The methodology of the breaching experiment is very simple and straightforward, but it teaches a rich lesson about social norms, social order, and the unseen rules of society that people take granted. The
…show more content…
The experiment took place outside a popular shopping centre, Capitol at Queen Street Cardiff. Before the experiment began as student we all dispersed around the area, to begin standing still. Yes standing still. Our breaching experiment was to stand still in a public place emotionless and see how people reacted to it, simple as that. Dropped anything that would seem normal in day to day lives. Before we went out we received 2 small pieces of paper saying, “ I am standing still” and “ I am a Cardiff University student doing an Experiment. If you have any concerns about the experiment please contact my supervisor Dr Steven Stanley on (029) 2087 4853. These pieces of paper were given to us to hand them out if someone asked us questions. As participants and researches we had to stand still for 10 minutes. Some voice recorded the experiment, took videos in hope of having some evidence of people’s reaction. After the 10 minutes were over our lecturer walk past with a black coat and a black umbrella. Then we all went back to normality.

The reaction to the break is the crucial point of the experiment. So after performing the break as ‘researchers’ we then had to observe and record the reactions of the people who witnessed the break. If a breach is done correctly and the social norm is cooperated, the reaction that people show is the mechanism by which they try to make sense of the odd behaviour or how they deal with the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    However, this is a largely simplistic view of the results of the experiments. The participants did not simply obey the person of authority named the experimenter. As demonstrated in the extensive video footage of the experiments, many of them exhibited great distress and tension, attempted to refuse participation, and tried to reason with the experimenter (Milgram, 1962). While it can be argued that a reasonable person could simply exit the room to leave or to check on the other participant receiving the shocks, the situation prevented this action, not physically, but psychologically. In turn, it may be argued that rather than obedience to orders, the participants of this study succumbed to incessant…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An experiment should not cause any harm to its participants, even if it is not physical, but mental. In the defense of Milgram, however, the debrief of the participants afterwards usually ensured a decrease in their stress level due to the knowledge that the learner was safe from harm. Therefore, the effects of tension were only short-term, and the debriefing usually solved their problems. The participants were assured that their behavior was common and that they were not sadistic or horrible people. About 83.7% of people stated that they were happy to be involved in the experiment, and only 1.3% wished that they hadn't gone through the experiment.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His experiment included a teacher (the subject), a student (an actor), and an ominous “torture” machine which the subjects were told could give shocks up to 450 volts. The teacher gave the questions verbally to the student. If the student answered incorrectly the teacher had to shock them with the machine even though there was actually no shock given. The teachers had to increase the voltage for each wrong answer given in some variations of the experiment, in others they could choose whichever voltage they wanted. The student/actor would purposely give incorrect answers now and then and would act in pain whenever he was “shocked.”…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some of these reactions given left me feeling stupid and very weird. Had this not been for a class assignment I would have definitely been left feeling like an outcast or just plain awkward. In conclusion, this experiment opened my eyes to see just how heavily we use social norms as guidelines for our society. We, as a society, have created social norms and expect ourselves and others to follow.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baurind Experiment Analysis

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    Because the experiment takes place in a laboratory, Baumrind argues that participants will not act how they might in the real world. She states that the laboratory is an unaccustomed setting for a typical being and may cause anxiety and passivity (225). Correspondingly, Saul Mcleod, a psychologist who summarizes and critiques Milgram’s experiment, states that the “important” location of the experiment, obedience levels increased (Simply Psychology). The point about setting is one in which Baumrind and Parker are able to reach a consensus.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. What were the theoretical propositions of this experiment? In what aspect(s) of human behavior were they interested? What question(s) were they seeking to answer?…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Issues within the Stanford Prison Experiment The Stanford prison experiment was a controversial experiment in human behavior conducted at Stanford University in 1971. The experiment took twenty-four voluntary students and placed them in the role of either prison guard or prisoner, in a make shift prison that was constructed in the basement of the psychology department of Stanford University. The experiment was to last fourteen days but was terminated after six days due to the negative psychological impact on the participants (Haney, Banks, & Zimbardo (1973).…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram and Hofling et al. have found the possible danger of obedience in different groups of people. In Milgram’s experiment the participants were 40 men in age range of 20-50 that can be described as average members of public. Hofling et al. conducted his study on 22 nurses.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Another real-world example of social constructionism that also shows itself in the Stanford Prison Experiment is the bystander effect. The bystander effect is a psychological theory that refers to the tendency of individuals to not offer help or assistance to a victim in the presence of others. Psychologist believe that the probability of a victim receiving assistance decreases as the number of bystanders or witnesses increase. One classic explanation of this theory came from two social psychologists, Bibb Latane and John M. Darley, who decided that they needed to conduct a number of experiments to test the theory of bystander apathy after receiving inspiration from a very riveting court case at the time; The murder of Kitty Genovese. In 1964,…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Visual Cliff Analysis

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to the article, the shocks got so severe that the learner would bang on the wall for the teacher to hear. The teacher was not able to stop. The point of the experiment was to see how long a person would go shocking someone even though that person is getting hurt and…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Source A McLeod, Saul. Stanford Prison experiment. SimplyPsychology, 2008. Web. 12 Feb. 2016.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    On August 14, 1971 Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment called the Stanford Prison Experiment took off. Young men were offered $15 a day to take part in a mock prison experiment in the basement of the Stanford University Psychology Department. The men were divided into either prison guards or prisoners, this experiment was only to last two weeks. Upon the prisoners arrival at the make shifted prison they were stripped off their clothes and sprayed with disinfecting spray. Each prisoner was issued a dress as a uniform with their prison identification number on the back and front.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1973, Philip Zimbardo, a professor of psychology at Stanford University conducted a summer experiment showing how humans in would react towards being in closed in a prison environment. He recruited college students and offered to pay them, too many it was more interesting than a summer job. The experiment was supposed to continue for two weeks and the participants would be divided into two group’s containing prisoners and guards. As volunteering prisoners of this experiment they would have to get use to their privacy being violated, as well as being harassed. Zimbardo’s wanted to find out the how long it would take for the prisoners and guards to conform to the roles they were classified as.…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This experiment went wrong and led to mental problems. These problems became so extreme that the experiment was discontinued after 6 days instead of 2 weeks. The Stanford Prison Experiment called into question the idea of Good vs Evil. The experiment showed how situational journey can cause an individual to “compromise” their beliefs. This change in behavior lead to psychological conflict among the “guards” and “prisoners.”…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deception plays a key and controversial role in the ethics of psychological research. In psychology, deception occurs either when information is withheld from participants (omission) or when participants are intentionally misinformed about an aspect of the research (commission). This essay will explore whether participants in psychological experiments should ever be deceived regarding the true nature of the experiment. This will be analysed by discussing the arguments for and against deception using some controversial case studies in research. Non deceptive methods of research do not always allow researchers to explore true findings.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays