Baig V. Harvie: Case Study

Improved Essays
This essay about the case of Baig v Harvie [2015]. The case concerns an appeal from a man who was previously convicted under section 38 of the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 for abusive and threatening behaviour directed towards two parking attendants. The appellant’s appeal centres on the fact that his improper conduct was only verbal and that he had not been proven to have caused fear or alarm to the attendants. This essay will explain the terms of section 38, how they apply to the facts of this case and discuss some issues with the defence laid out in Subsection 2. It will also critique the defences provided by Baig and explain why the decision was correctly upheld.

Section 38 details the crime of threatening or abusive behaviour. Section 38 (1) outlines the three main elements of the offence. The first element is that the accused has behaved in a threatening or abusive manner and this is expanded upon by subsection (3) which states that this can be either physical or verbal and be a single act or a sustained course of conduct. The second element of the offence is that actions taken would be likely to cause a reasonable person to suffer fear or alarm. This
…show more content…
If the accused can prove that their behaviour was ‘reasonable’ in the circumstances then they will not be convicted. Given the potential breadth of this defence, it is interesting to consider what kind of circumstances would be deemed ‘reasonable’ for a person to use threatening or abusive behaviour. In Urquhart v HMA [2015] the accused attempted to claim self-defence, however the judge in that case ruled that self-defence would mean intent to cause fear or alarm and that because of this, it was not valid as a defence for this offence. This ruling begs the question of what circumstances would have to be present for the subsection 2 defence to apply, if in fact there are

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case name: Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987) Facts: Ardith McPherson was appointed a deputy in the Constable’s office of Harris County, Texas, on January 12, 1981. Her duties were only clerical. On March 30, 1981, McPherson discussed with her boyfriend, and fellow employee, a report about an attempt to assassinate the President of the United States. She made the remark “If they go for him again, I hope they get him”. Her remark was reported to Constable Rankin, who fired McPherson, even though she told him she did not mean anything by it.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The motives of prior battering, jealousy and separation all fall under the category of domestic violence or control and make up a significant amount of homicide statistics in New South Wales and Victoria (Easteal, 1993). Justice McCallum (R v Gittany, 2013) judged that Gittany had intent to kill or inflict grievous bodily harm on Ms Harnum and stated that unloading her from the 15th floor was could only have been acted out with intent. A witness had stated that Ms Harnum confided in her about her fiancé’s threat to kill her if she left him and that he would make it look like suicide (R v Gittany,…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the Baze v. Rees case, two inmates named Ralph Baze and Thomas Bowling were convicted for murder and sentenced with the death penalty. In 1992, Ralph Baze killed a Kentucky County Sheriff with three shots fired in his back, and also killed a deputy sheriff with two shots in the back and one in the back of his head (Rushford). The other inmate, Thomas Bowling rammed into a car in the dry cleaning parking lot; he got out of the car and shot the couple and the two-year-old child in the car and drove away in 1990 (Rushford). Baze and Bowling had claimed that Kentucky’s lethal injections is cruel and unusual punishment which is a violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. The lethal injections is a process that includes a dose of Diazepam which…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    MOSHER V BENSON BACKGROUND: At the age of 17 Kyle Mosher purchased a car from Peter Benson. The motion before the court was to have the matter set aside due to the plaintiff being a minor. Mosher had requested that the contract be reversed since he was a minor at the time the car was purchased and further stated that the vehicle was not in roadworthy condition and therefore had to pay and excessive price for the vehicle. According to the British Columbia Infants Act Subsection 27 (a) An adult, who at the time he or she entered a contract was an infant, can reject the contract if (c) he or she gives, oral or written notice of rejection to another party to the contract within one year after reaching the age of majority.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    R. V. Hauser Case Study

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages

    While studying the case R. v Hauser, it is clear to see why it is known to be one of the leading constitutional decisions in understanding the workings of Peace, order and good governments in relation to a power struggle of jurisdiction. The whole case surrounds the question on whether the Attorney General, or the Attorney General of Canada should have the power to control the prosecution under the Federal Narcotics Control Act. It is a battle for powers of jurisdiction in regards to the criminal code, and more so the Narcotics Control Act; (NCA), 1961. The Narcotics Act was once Canada’s national drug control statue prior to its repeal in 1996 where the Controlled Drugs and Substance Act took its place. The NCA upheld an international treaty which prohibited the production, and supply of specific drugs; normally narcotics, unless given a licence for specific…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King V Burwell Case Study

    • 1321 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Question 6: The Supreme Court’s ruling on June 25, 2015 to preserve subsidies in states that have not established their own exchange brings upon several positive implications. One of the biggest implications from the decision is that there will now be broader access to healthcare coverage. This is because the IRS rule grants premium tax credits to individuals in all Exchanges, regardless of whether they are state-run or federally-facilitated. Also, since the Supreme Court’s decision upheld the IRS ruling, health coverage will now be more affordable as millions of people will get tax breaks.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On the 25th of October I attended Canterbury crown court. The proceeding I observed was a sentencing and named ‘Operation Hailstone’. I will firstly make an overall summary of what happened and then reflect and analyse on my experience by highlighting what surprised me, what didn’t, what I learnt and what the whole experience has done for me. Once I had been through security and was seated in my chosen court room the judge walked in and the judges clerk announced the charge on Anthony Baker, being violent disorder, she then went on to say the defendant had pleaded guilty.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From the pattern of escalating behaviour it is clear that Mr Biag did not behave in a reasonable manner howvever the defnce still arguged Miss Mitchell on behalf of the appellant submitted that where an altercation was purely verbal They also cited Harris v HMA advocate[8] Which is the grounds that the appellant was appealing on the argument would entail that any utterance made privately to another individual which was, objectively speaking, disturbing or alarming would be sufficient to constitute the crime”They even questioned the dictionary definations of the words “Fear” and “alarm” thus furthering the confusion. Also the fact he followed the parking attendinndts can also be compared to Harvey v HMA[9] The accused took exception and followed the complainer through streets in Girvan shouting abuse at him. The elemts of the act can be found in In Urquhart v HMA 2015 SLT 853, Lady Clark of Calton indicated that the offence had “three distinct…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Facts The facts are Baig and his brother had an encounter with two parking attendants after being issued with a penalty charge notice. Baig and his brother had been confrontational, aggressive and verbally abusive towards the attendants. The Sheriff found inter alia Baig’s conduct would have been likely to cause a reasonable person to suffer fear and alarm; a contravention of s.38(1) of the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010 (thereafter “the 2010 Act”). Baig’s behaviour caused the parking attendants to be fearful of, and alarmed by, his behaviour.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the court reiterated that there is a common law rule governing police powers of the detention must be viewed as reasonable necessary of the circumstances , informing the officer's suspicion that there is a clear Nexus between the individual to be detained and recent or on-going criminal offences . Reasonable grounds figure at the front-end of such as assessment underlying the officers reasonable suspicion that the particular individual is implicated in the criminal activity under investigation. The supreme court preferred the phrase "reasonable grounds to detain " rather than the phrase " Articulable cause " .…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1833 Factory Act Essay

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    His detailed investigations reach many logical inferences, particularly about magistrates’ leniency in differentiating between willful offenders and poor parents, which may have unintentionally undermined how they judged. He provides evidence with thorough historiography to refute claims that they impeded the Act from making a critical difference in that corruption has been exaggerated, misrepresenting a successful piece of…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Importance Of Duty Of Care

    • 4284 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Last accessed 8th April 2013 HRCR. (1981). Young, James & Webster v. United Kingdom, 44 Eur. Ct. H.R. (ser.…

    • 4284 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Laws Of Assault

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Laws of Assault According to Bergman, crime against persons refers to an offense which by its nature involves the risk that the offender will use physical force against another individual (Bergman, 2016). For example, an assault is a crime against an individual which includes attempts of causing body harm to another person using a weapon such as a gun. Such crimes are punishable, and depend on the jurisdiction where the offender might serve some jail time. Most states stipulate policies which protect its citizen legal rights. Assault and battery laws help determine the degree of the crime together with punishment depending on the statute of a country.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ruling in favour of the police will no doubt open floodgates for policemen to exercise their powers beyond what their mandate would allow. In Lord Bingham’s formulation of the rule of law his sixth sub rule was “…ministers and public officers ..must exercise the powers conferred on them….without exceeding the limits of such powers”. This can be taken to mean the police should not be allowed to use their powers to intimidate certain classes of people or have a bias towards specific groups in society. In other words, “the laws of the land should apply equally to all”. It is not out of the question to suggest that there could have been a bias that PC Adams had towards Mr. Walker that made him feel as though he could intimidate Mr.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial discretion refers to the powers conferred to a judge in the legal system of a given country to determine the direction of a matter presented to them without the interference of preceding or strict regulations that are established by statutes (Bushway et al. 2012). Judicial discretion is assigned by the legal apparatus within a given jurisdiction, meaning that court decisions may be subject to contest through the utilization of higher powers. Judges are supposed to practice the discretion allowances up to the limit specified by the law, failure to which decisions may be subjected to comprehensive vetting. For instance, the practice of discretion may be void judgement decisions in the event of bias, capricious practices, and the exercising…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays