Director, Kent Thompson, fails to bring Hamlet’s character up to my level of expectation, and, actor, Aubrey Deeker, falls short in his performance as Hamlet. Deeker performs Hamlet with a feministic flare, which, immediately takes away from the brooding young college student, ravenous with revenge that one would expect to see. I am typically enthralled with Hamlet’s soliloquies and the deepness that I usually find within his words; whether he is angry, vengeful, passionate, or crazy, Hamlet has a way of fluently conveying his emotions. Deekers’ Hamlet was extremely flat, and without emotion; I had a hard time believing that Hamlet believed in what he was saying. He came across as subservient to his mother and uncle, despite his deep-rooted feelings of betrayal and grief. Deekers Hamlet seemed content in promptly obeying his mother’s wishes of not returning to college in Wittenberg, and only …show more content…
I am not saying that I agree with his character, but the way he was played, was astonishingly spot on. When I envision, based on my reading, what a character should look like, sound like, act like, and carry themselves as, the actor of Claudius was spot on. The actor himself was a bigger, broad man, which, lent very well to the preconceived image of Claudius I had in my mind. In addition, the actor carried the character in a perfect light of suspicion throughout the play; the audience always had a feeling that Claudius was hiding something by his tone of