Argumentative Essay: The Myth Of My Body

Superior Essays
Philosophically Persuasive Argument Essay
Maybe the wise Plato himself one asked the same questions we ask ourselves every day. Who am I, and who will I become? Am I the same self I was five years ago? What about ten years? Many philosophers have questioned, “Is it possible that I am the same person throughout my life, even though there are changes in my body? Is there a way to know that who we are today isn’t different than who we were last week?” These types of questions may seem shallow on first glance, but looking deeper, it is the basis of self-perception and what many of us build our own thoughts of self on.
David Hume claims this is called the psychological mind or the memory. He says it is the mind that creates our personal identity, not our body as that consistently changes,. He noted that our bodies are always in flux, changing from second to second, day to day, and year to year, but our minds are evolving in a way that holds on to what we learned
…show more content…
It is the body that is unique. Again, our bodies are a natural continuation of our old body. Yet our soul remains the same. Before writing this paper, I asked friends and family if they thought they were the same person they were ten years ago and it was an awakening to find that most of the responses were that they are not the same person because life events have changed them. The other portion of answers I got looked within and agreed with that the soul has stayed unchanged; just like the ship that sailed into the harbor and was remodeled, but the same soul has always remained inside.
I know that I am the same person as I was ten years ago because I was born into this body and have gone through many changes and various events that have affected how I see things and my actions from that point on, but the same me exists inside this body and my ‘self’ will stay with this body even after its passing. I am and will forever always be the same me, but I will continue to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Parfit explored two possible explanations to determine if humans are composed of bodily or psychological continuity. From this statement, he continued to develop his argument to claim that human identity is neither physical or mental. By not determining what personal identity encompassed, Parfit endorsed reductionism. From the use of Relation R, Parfit acknowledged that personal identity is not the important factor, but rather psychological connectedness is. Humans are reducible to more basic components than psychological or bodily continuity.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Therefore making the point that selves emerge through interaction with others. Another one of his explanations of self is the “I” and the “me” where “me: refers to others expectations of us and “I” refers to how a person…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this quote he means that don’t be put as a label and be who you want to be. Nobody can make the decision for who you are, you have to shape that. This is like Equality 7-2521, he doesn’t get to be who he wants to be. He is forced to be who they want him to be. He is not himself he is a label.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis of Philosophical Arguments of Self-Identity Who or what is the essence of “you”? What is the difference of your mind versus your body; are they the same or entirely different entities? The answers can have significant meanings for the legal and ethical system, not to mention personal beliefs. The views of Thomas Locke and David Humes will be explored in this paper Thomas Locke wrote immensely about this subject. He set out to describe who “self” is and relate that in a manner which is easily understood.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Becoming You Who do you think you are? All people are different and they all take different routes to becoming themselves. There are many autobiographies out there and numerous accounts of people’s childhoods.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The four theories of personal identity—body theory, soul theory, memory theory, brain theory— are very well discussed in John Perry's book, A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality. In an argument between Gretchen Weirob, Sam Miller, and Dave Cohen, all these theories are put into question in a discussion about the possibility of life after death. Overall, throughout the book , in these discussions it seems as if the body theory wins the argument for having more pros and fewer cons than the memory, brain and soul theories. However, this theory is contradicted and deemed not possible because when the body dies the person identity no longer exists.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is unique according to experience, the disassociation or stronger connection of mind-body, the ability to cope, and the support available from others. The traditional accounts do make sense in a clean way, not burdened by the social factor. What these accounts failed to recognize was the real world, and how our perceptions of situations and other people can change our thoughts so rapidly. Bodily and emotional trauma can cause change so fast that identity is lost in persistence of memory and emotion, but can also be healed or recovered in some way from the empathy of those around…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will argue that the thought experiment that Bernard Williams presents us is actually meant to show us that the psychological continuity criterion is flawed. The flaw presented is shown through the reaction of fear when someone is told they will be tortured and even if you break the psychological continuity of a person through the examples shown of memory loss, the gain of new memories, and body swap. The experiments show that the person will continue to see him/herself as the same person, although they are told they will lose all traits and memories that they now know and get new ones. I will go through the scenario pointed out in the thought experiment and how it begins to prove that psychological continuity is shown…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the single body cease to exist, due to the nature of the link between psychological person stages, the memory is not able to continue and hence, survival is not possible. The duplication objection gives rise to the theory that many alternative casual processes that may provide survival for one endorsing the view of memory theory should exist. In John Perry’s Dialog on Personal Identity, the duplication objection observed the idea that upon death, God transfers all information of a person from past to future onto a “heavenly rememberer” in order for survival of the memory to continue. This heavenly rememberer would think, speak, remember and experience all the things we have experienced in life and have the capability of passing by as any individual that God wishes to preserve.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In John Perry’s A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality, Perry discusses both the possibility of immortality (the ability to survive after death) and the question of personal identity. In the process, he proposes three theories as to what could account for personal identity: soul theory, memory theory, and body theory. First, however, it is necessary to discuss what the question of personal identity is. Personal identity refers to a human being’s numerical identity over time. Thus, the question of personal identity essentially asks what must be preserved in order for a person to be considered the same, or continuous, over time.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In John Perry’s “A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality,” there are many arguments that discuss the criterion of personal identity. Within The First Night, Gretchen Weirob and Sam Miller begin to discuss the idea of an immaterial soul and its reasonability of existence, which is the main idea. Miller discusses the various reasons why an immaterial soul exists while Weirob argues its existence and eventually, its relevance. Throughout the dialogue, Miller introduces various theories to support the idea of an immaterial soul and its use of allowing the survival of a person after death. His main theory represents the principle of “Same body, same self” (Perry, 325) otherwise discussed as “same body, same soul.”…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everybody goes through a stage in their life where they want to be independent. In Joyce Carol Oates “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?” the main character Connie shows many signs of wanting to just grow up and move on to the next stage in her life. I relate to the story through the character Connie, as she represents and gives off different themes that contribute to the bigger picture of the story that I find myself relating to, such as a desire to grow up and having two different personas that showcase an internal confusion of who I am. Increasingly throughout the last couple of years in my life, I have found myself having a growing fire within me that is pushing me to want to become more independent and act more as a grown up.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People have always been interested in the idea of finding out about personal identity, what makes you the same person as you were when you were five and what will make you the same person when you are eighty. Derek Parfit summed up this idea by saying “Whatever happens between now and any future time, either I shall still exist, or I shall not. Any future experience will either be my experience, or it will not.” (Parfit- 186), which is what personal identity looks into. This essay will discuss whether personal identity is a matter of physical or psychological continuity, taking into account the famous ideas of philosophers such as John Locke, Derek Parfit and Bernard Williams.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke born on August 29, 1632, was an English philosopher who is well known for his theory of mind. In Chapter XXVII: Identity and Diversity, John Locke begins by saying that we only have ideas of three substances which are God, finite intelligence, and bodies. John Locke then goes on to state that personal identity also has to to do with the the string of consciousness and has nothing to do with remaining the same substance or matter which is either physical or mental. John Locke states, “When we consider something as existing at a given time and place and compare it with itself existing at another time, we are led to form the ideas of identity and diversity” (112).…

    • 1572 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Within every person, there is an immortal soul. Immortal meaning that after death the soul continues to live on. During the paper, I will explain Plato’s view towards the immortality of the soul, which argument of Plato’s is the strongest to defending his claim, then I will talk about three arguments as to why I believe there is an immortal soul within each human being. Finally, I will look back at Plato’s strongest argument from the first section and give my personal take on his belief as to why we have an immortal soul.…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays