Andrew Carnegie Vs Karl Marx

Improved Essays
In the many centuries and decades that have passed us by there were many great philosophers. These brilliant minds created theories, examples, and opinions on topics that are still controversial in our time today. The two that I’d like to draw attention to are Andrew Carnegie and Karl Marx. Although, their opinions are similar they have different standpoints on the ways our economies would become more efficient. In the Gospel of Wealth, Carnegie’s views were open-minded. He elaborates on his idea that our economy would increase it’s worth if the rich distributed their money to the poor. The problem is not the inequality or the wealthy, but the rich not using their money appropriately, Carnegie believed. Thus, if the rich are able to give back

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Carnegie quote does not fall in line with the way he ran his factory or used his money to help people. Before he became successful with steal, Carnegie sold defective rifles to his own army, showing that he would do anything to make a profit for himself. Death and injuries became a weekly occurrence in Carnegie’s factory but it didn’t bother him or his partner, Frick. The workers in the factories were being paid small amounts to work in terrible conditions but Carnegie had millions of dollars he could use to create a better working atmosphere.…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Gospel of Wealth Andrew Carnegie was the incarnation and manifestation of an ideal American Dream as he began his career as a replaceable servant and rose to power as he became a premier American Industrialist. Through years of hard work and determination he had finally become an established member of society when he started his Carnegie Steel Company. After attaining his massive wealth he published an essay in regards to the wealthy’s treatment of the laissez-faire, concerned about social and economic ideas of those who were not as well off as them. By focusing on the justification of laissez-faire capitalism and the assertion of philanthropic responsibilities to wealthy industrialists who profited from their exploitation of an unregulated economy, a certain etiquette was assumed by those who were financially stable.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Carnegie was a “robber baron”, in his personal relationships and the way he treated his workers, who did beneficial things under the guise of being a “captain of industry” to try to overshadow the awful things he did. He was conflicted his entire life between the two great influences of his childhood. His father and grandmother represented the true ideals of democracy, of the rights of the people while his mother was materialistic and determined to reach the top economically through whatever means necessary. This internal conflict is apparent throughout Carnegie’s entire life although he leans further towards the views of his mother. His mentor, Thomas Scott, taught him the skills he would later use to become the undisputed king of…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew believed in the even distribution of wealth, “the duty of the man of wealth (is to) set an example of modest [...] to produce the most beneficial results for the community” (Doc M). He was also a person who donated lots of money to charity and even tried to make up for his mistakes by funding $1,450,000 to the Carnegie Corporation which is now a foundation that gives out “about $100,000,000 a year, most of it to education” (Doc N). Carnegie’s philanthropy is a good reason why Carnegie was a hero because he believed that the rich should be giving money so it is distributed evenly instead of giving all the inheritance to a family member. This way, the community would strive more as a whole. He also donated a lot a money that helped others towards their education and access to reading in free public…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carnegie asserts, “The laws of accumulation should be left free; the law of distribution free. Individualism will continue, but the millionaire will be but a trustee; entrusted for a season with a part of the increased wealth of the community, but administering it for the community far than it did, or would have done, of itself (495). By stating this, Carnegie contradicts him with him saying that individualism will reconcile poor and rich, but reality Carnegie views this as dictatorial act. Carnegies view of individualism in not seen as a freedom of action for the individuals instead it is view as a concentration of power. With his contradictory meanings of individualism, Carnegie’s argument is…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The central theme of Carnegie's argument about the Gospel of Wealth is that rich people are superior to all others and should be allowed to use their money to help the less "fit" people. Carnegie believed in Social Darwinism. He believed that the fact that a person was rich showed that he was more fit than others. This meant that the rich man was the one who knew the most about how to prosper in society.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All in all, Marx and Carriage had two very distinct approaches in how society should function, but Carnegie better is more rational because it excludes the possibility of a revolution. One topic that Carnegie and Marx disagree with is class relations. Carnegie believed that people who worked hard deserved to have a successful life, however, he does suggest that affluent should deal diminishing the gap between the rich and poor. He states “The best minds will thus have reached a stage of development of the race in which it is clearly seen that no mode of disposing of surplus wealth creditable to thoughtful and earnest men into whose hands it flows save by using it year by year for the general good.”(372).…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Carnegie, wealth can be distributed in three ways, first passing it down to the following family generation. Carnegie’s opinion on leaving money to the family was not a wise choice not just because the family may not be deserving of the money or it being a sense…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his argument he says that "The man who dies thus rich dies disgraced". The reflection of this statement to his real life is that before he died he gave away some $350 million dollars which was the bulk of his wealth. He then went on to state in his work that "a moral obligation to distribute in ways that promote the welfare and happiness of the common man". Here he is talking about sharing the knowledge of how to make it in the world and sharing how one becomes better off. Here the reflection shows when Carnegie funds over 2,500 public libraries and makes generous donations to many churches and organizations that are still around today.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Andrew Carnegie talks about how the upper class, or wealthy people, have a responsibility to help reduce their extra wealth by being charitable to help bring to light the issues of of wealth inequality. He thinks that society will be able to use the wealth more responsibly than the State. He talks about his dislike of people who use their money irresponsibly on material things. He thinks that the way the upper class share their wealth should encourage responsible spending. He talks about how there two types of upper class people.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This group wanted equality for those in poverty so bad, they began to blame the other classes, but while doing so, they forgot about the rights of those classes. Andrew Carnegie believed that the rich are more “fit” than anyone else and that they may spend their money as they choose. Henry George explains how and why poverty is a crime. George said people in poverty…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Andrew Carnegie was born, on November 25,1835, in Dunfermline,Fife,Scotland. He grew up to become one of the wealthiest businessmen in America. His family once believed in the importance of books and education, although he didn’t have a formal education when he was a kid. His father was once a weaver and a profession. he once was replaced by robots for his job.…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Carnegie believed that it was the duty of the wealthy to help the poor. His idea of help came in the form of opportunities “to help those who will help themselves.” The wealthy would provide opportunities, not direct aid, to the poor; these opportunities could take the forms of “free libraries, parks, and means of recreation by which men are helped in body and mind; works of art, certain to give pleasure and improve the general condition of the people.” However, these opportunities did not really help the poor.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Income and Wealth Inequality of America As a capitalist nation, the United State of America is facing a serious problem, which is the inequality of wealth and income. In pace with the growth of the economy, the rich people are getting richer and the poor people are getting poorer. The gap between the rich and poor is widening unprecedentedly fast. Why is that happening?…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the major figures discussed briefly within chapter one, but was developed within chapter two was Karl Marx. Karl Marx was one of the most influential theorists in both methods of sociology and governmental affairs. Not only did he decipher major issues that were prominent within society during his time period, but he also handled issues that would become part of future countries governmental societies decades beyond his time. Two of the major influential theories of Karl Marx involved logical argument within worth and the free market enterprise system with its influence upon socialism. The first issue that Karl Marx studied and deciphered involved the concept of logical argument.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays