If I Was A Melian Citizen Essay

Improved Essays
The Melian councillors made a horrible mistake by not accepting the terms of the Athenians in 416, and because of their irrational decision, their entire population got decimated. The Melians people were delusional in their assumptions that everything would work out in their favour, and they expected that outside forces would come to assist them, and would help make sure their battle ended in a favourable outcome. If I was a Melian citizen at the time of this decision, I would strongly oppose the councillors’ choice, because most of their arguments were based on a dependence of outside forces, and not based upon what they could do for themselves. You can see their level of misconception through their arguments that other Greek states would be alarmed and revolt, through their insistence that the gods would come to their aid, and through their assumption that the Spartans would come save them. All of these …show more content…
If I was a citizen at that time, I would absolutely reject the councillors’ decision, because a majority of the arguments presented, relied upon the presence and action of outside beings, instead of the Melian citizens utilizing their own merits and strengths. This is clearly evident in the arguments they make to the Athenians about alarming neutral Greek states, through their insistence of the gods supporting them, and through their adamance that the Spartans would rescue them. Although the Melians briefly made an assertion that they had a chance to win on their own against the Athenians, it was unwarranted, because they were not capable to do that on their own, and like many of their previous claims, this one was also based upon luck. The Melians made their greatest mistake in 416 by not taking the deal with the Athenians, and because they could not stand on their own, their entire civilization was either murdered or

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nicias and the Importance of Persuasive Leadership How did Nicias fail to convince the Athenian assembly that the Sicilian Expedition was a strategic error? His arguments, while valid and logical, are not sufficient to win over the assembly to undo their vote of war. Not only does Thucydides have incomplete information about these events, but Thucydides’ prior knowledge of Nicias’s failure colors the way he reconstructs Nicias’s ineffective arguments against war. Nicias attempts to dissuade the assembly from a war it has already approved by discussing the lack of a compelling reason to aid the Egesteans, the challenge of conquering and ruling Sicily, and the fragile truce with Sparta. Because Nicias’s appeals are ultimately unsuccessful, Thucydides uses this failure as an example of ineffective leadership in the Athenian state.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pericles Funeral Oration

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The speech, “Funeral Oration”, was a eulogy written in the winter of 431-430 B.C.E. by Pericles who was the Athenian leader. Pericles delivered this speech to the survivors of the fallen who lost their lives fighting in the Peloponnesian War. Between 431 BC and 404 BC, the Peloponnesian War was fought between the Peloponnesian League, led by the Spartans, and Delian League, led by the Athenians. Sparta feared that Athens was becoming too powerful, leaving them no choice but to invade, defeating Athens. need to be cited and explain more, also add thesis statement here.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since an early age, I have always wanted to be involved with health sciences, and I have work as hard as I can to accomplish this dream. I was born into a Hispanic family, and raised in way that puts values ahead of money or economic status. I did not enjoy the luxuries that many of my friends had, but I was taught very strong principles. My father always taught me to work hard no matter what, weather it was for a job, school or a hobby. He always told me that I will encounter many rocks in my path, but that it would be up to me to stay behind that rock and let the rock defeat me, or I could just find a way to continue on my path until the next rock.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ancient Greece was the very first democracy in history, and their beliefs in Freedom and Liberty for their citizens. The two types of freedoms were political (Governed by their own laws), and individual (do what we want). Freedom is the Central theme associated with democracy. After Greece’s downfall, democracy was not known again till the American Revolution. History is made by Great People.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our City of Athens has been struggling for some time now to become a stronger city. At this time we are facing a battle just as difficult as the recent battles we have faced. As an assembly, we granted the metics who fought with Thrasybulus the right to citizenship. Those metics showed loyalty, strength, and passion to give Athens a chance to get back to the city we once were. Those characteristics shown by the metics are similar characteristics the slaves who also fought showed as well.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Alcibiades swayed the Athenians and they approved his plan which placed two of the three generals executing a plan they did not support from the onset. This is only compounded when the general that did support the plan was condemned to death by Athens. The remaining two generals remain to execute a campaign that was partially based on a lack of understanding of the support they could expect which created…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the court of Athens, Socrates was being tried for allegedly corrupting the youth, according to Meletus. Socrates argued that his corruption of the youth was done unintentionally and that there was no malicious intent in the conversations he had with them. Athens was a democratic state in which the people were able to think and speak freely. It will be argued that Socrates was not corrupting the youth because everyone in society has the potential to corrupt the youth. The analysis of this paper is that in a democratic society, you have the freedom to believe in what is deemed to be right or wrong and it is unfeasible for one singular person to influence a whole community.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Under his leadership, the government and Athens functioned well, demonstrating that a direct democracy with sufficient checks is an effective form of government. However, once the Athenians oust Pericles and become a pure democracy without sufficient checks, the ability of the assembly to wisely act dramatically decreases and causes them to vote for decisions such as the Sicilian expedition, ultimately causing them to lose the Peloponnesian…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I proclaim that the city of Melos is a neutral faction that has no interests in this war. As a neutral party it would be ethically wrong for you, Athens, to lay siege upon our city. We do not threaten your power, nor do we stand in the way of your army. In fact, it would be tyrannical of you to breach our right to be neutral even in a time of war. Ethically what does it say about Athens if you are going around murdering entire populations if they do not bow to your will.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the history of literature and storytelling, character development has always been one of the most necessary aspects of a successful story. Homer, author of The Iliad and The Odyssey, is considered one of the greatest storytellers of all time and utilized this practice quite well. In both of these epic poems, a plethora of characters grow in some regard or another. Agamemnon is the quintessential developing character in ancient Greek literature as seen through his change of character and evolution of leadership. Agamemnon’s shift from a failed leader whom few men would follow willingly to a charismatic leader of much improved ability is one of the strongest character developments in historic literature.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pacifists believe that focus should be on programs and institutions that allow for the avoidance of war and the ability to peacefully resolve conflicts (Ryan, 2015). Therefore from the perspective of a Pacifist the Athenian’s argument is immediately written off. A Pacifist would strongly argue that under no condition were Athens to inflict themselves upon the Melians as the act, in itself, is considered ‘war making’. Only brief attempts at peace building was made during the Melian Dialogue as the Athenians offer the Melians the chance to submit without direct conflict; “…you will not think it dishonourable to submit to the greatest city in Hellas, when it makes you the moderate offer of becoming its tributary ally, without ceasing to enjoy the country that belongs to you; nor when you have the choice given you between war and security, will you be so blinded as to choose the worse. ”(Thucydides, Warner, & Finley, 1972, Chapter XVII).…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Ancient Greek culture, honor was the most crucial virtue in their society. While honor might mean different things in different cultures; to the Ancient Greeks honor was an important part of their lives and culture. However, to the Ancient Greeks it was more than just honor that formed their identity. Arête as the Ancient Greeks called it consisted of honor, masculine virtue, physical strength, courage, success in battle and everlasting fame. Arête was the foundation of the family and the society, often dictating the actions of the people and consequently their fates and the fates of others.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Importantly, the Athenians do not disagree on principle. Instead, they say that it is the Spartans that would defeat them, not their subjects alone, and the Spartans would not be disposed to treat them terribly. This admittance seriously undermines the Athenian Thesis’ claim that justice is only relevant “between equals in power,” as the Athenians implicitly confess that arguments of justice could perhaps benefit them; they just don’t believe that those particular circumstances will arise. Justice and perceptions of justice, then, are relevant between those in unequal power – the Athenians only deny it to the Melians because that position is expedient to them. Thus, this disproves the universality of the claim that justice is only relevant between those equal in power.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    following strict standards of quality in gathering evidence and data to ensure his work contained accurate information. Thucydides stuck to empirical standards and did not mention the interference of the gods in his work, instead focusing on analysis, testimonies, and cause and effect in determining the outcome of the war. However, certain biases still existed such as Thucydides race as an Athenian and his stance as a realist. Thucydides’ favoritism towards the Athenians can be seen when he mockingly claims the Melians as deluded for putting their stake in the gods and the Spartans who hold no desire or reason to risk any loss in protecting Milos. Continuing to claim that the Spartans do not hold a reputation of being venturesome or noble when danger is involved.…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Athenian Democracy Essay

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The development of Athenian democracy was influenced by complex social, economic, and military issues, not to mention the obvious political aspect. However, even among these complex set of factors, one aspect in the development of Athenian democracy that stands out and affects all three sets of issues is warfare. Warfare was a constant in ancient Greece, and indeed most of the ancient world. City-states constantly fought, mostly against each other, though they would often band together against outside threats such as the Persians. The Greek style of warfare also tended to be fairly homogenous throughout the city-states as well, with an infantry formed from hoplites, and in the fifth century and later, a navy.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics