American Flag Stands For Tolerance By Ronald J. Brennan

Improved Essays
In 1484, a man named Gregory Lee Johnson decided to burn an American flag. This sparked massive debate across America after Johnson was arrested. Over five years later, the case made it to the Supreme Court. After deliberation, Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan delivered the majority opinion in “Texas v. Johnson Majority Opinion” that affirmed that Johnson should not be punished for burning the American flag. Yet again, debate has sparked over this ruling. Following the verdict, writer Ronald J. Allen stated his opinion in “American Flag Stands for Tolerance.” Though they are similar in actual opinion, the two writings differ in one main way: tone. Allen’s tone is much more passionate in comparison to Brennan’s. This allows Allen to …show more content…
He very simply states things as they are. This continues in the rest of the text, but he also adds a sense of earnestness. He goes on to say that the Supreme Court is “tempted to say, in fact, that the flag's deservedly cherished place in our community will be strengthened” (lines 26-27). He refers to the community as “our” community, which displays a sense of national pride and an acknowledgement of those who might disagree with the ruling. Using words such as “deservedly,” Brennan shows that he truly does care about the value of the American flag, which serves as another acknowledgement of its importance. The duality of Brennan’s earnestness and directness serves his purpose well. After all, his court opinion was written specifically for the use of lower courts in their future rulings on similar cases. Brennan needed to be direct and matter-of-fact for the lower courts, but his earnestness was for the rest of America. In contrast, Allen used passion in order to persuade those who were upset by the …show more content…
In particular, his phrase “by the closest possible margin” insights a bit of rage in anyone who disagrees with the ruling. It might make them feel upset at the fact that the Supreme Court was so close to swaying in angry people’s favor. Allen goes on to say that “the American flag is a cherished symbol of our national aspirations” (lines 10-11). Opposers to the Supreme Court ruling are likely angry at this point, so Allen flips their intense emotions into a feeling of pride. He affirms their beliefs about the flag by agreeing with them, but he has not actually delivered his opinion yet. His passionate tone, which is seen in words such as “cherished,” has made opposers open to his opinion. Allen then states, “The Supreme Court was not wrong. Indeed, a decision contrary to the one reached would have been a definitive step away from our national aspirations” (lines 22-24). Allen simultaneously displays a direct and passionate tone. His passion is shown through words such as “definitive” and “national.” He uses Supreme Court opponents’ own passion against them in an attempt to sway their

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The tone of Texas V. Johnson is a more strict tone and serious. Starting with ¨We decline, …¨ makes it sound as a decrease and make the rest of the passes more important as if it was being declared as a new law. But in the fact that it is not it still shows great importance. By including the First Amendment in the passes it showed the importance of the argument. By not having any personal opinion gave it a show of facts and truth.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though there was a State law in place to protect against unlawful burning of the American flag, the First Amendment protects symbolic speech which is what the Supreme Court deemed Johnson’s act…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Johnson argued that his actions were protected by the first amendment, and that by him burning the flag, he was speaking out against what he believed to be wrong. The Court ruled in his favor by a margin of one vote. The case was 5-4 in Gregory…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He has large self-will, and his stubbornness is only exceeded by his bigotry” (Packard v. Packard, pg. 14). The description of the plaintiff should only suggest the reasons to his unconscious decision.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also cited that the court upheld that states had the right to determine what violated proper treatment of the flag. Overall Rehnquist conveyed that he felt that the flag deserved more respect because it represents not only our nation but also the society, history, and culture of America. In my opinion, he fell into the category of people who were offended and want to quiet those people who speak…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    13. I observed that even though women groups were concerned about Clarence Thomas ruling against legal abortion during the first few court hearings when Thomas was asked about abortion he didn't even have an opinion on it. 14.I observed that Anita Hill a professor a law professor from the University of Oklahoma accused Clarence Thomas of sexually harassing her when they worked together. 15. I observed after many hearings of the Clarence Thomas, and Anita Hill case in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee the Senate voted Clarence Thomas to be serve as an associate justice for the Supreme Court by a vote of 52-48.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within the speech he suggested to the American people to “let us begin.” By alluding to Kennedy’s speech he is able to shift into his own political agenda by stating “let us continue.” Now using the appeal of ethos, he once again uses the technique of anaphora to tell the American people “not to hesitate, not to pause.” Using the credibility of a once loved President, allows for Kennedy’s supporters to also support Johnson. This contrasts to the end of the section where he tells the American people “to act wisely, to act vigorously, to act speedily. . .”…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The constitution was the founding document that laid the groundwork for American and everything it stands for. Johnson emphasizes this fact by telling “the Constitution says that no person shall be kept from voting because of his race or his color” and “we all have sworn an oath before God to support and to defend that Constitution.” Bringing up these facts adds the credibility to his message by implying that the Founding Fathers would have approved and the right to vote is actually in the basis of the country’s values, which is a necessary support considering that most citizens had contrasting opinions due to racism. Similarly, Johnson repeatedly mentions facts surrounding the beliefs and founding of the country in order to further support his purpose. He states “Our mission is at once the oldest and the most basic of this country- to right wrong, to do justice, to serve man” and “This was the first nation in the history of the world to be founded with a purpose.”…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When an unpredictable situation came up between Yoni and Sergei, Sergei’s engagements showed that he is an intimate person in his relationship with Yoni. In the “American Flag Stands for Tolerance” by Ronald J. Allen, Allen states his whole opinion on the case of the American Flag in his newspaper editorial. “The crucial distinction is that the commitment to freedom of conscience and expression states the simplest and least self contradictory principle that seems to capture our aspirations. Any other principle is hopelessly…

    • 2111 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The editorial says “… what is the harm in insisting upon a modicum of respect for it?” to contrast about the flag meaning to most citizens in the United States. The editorial also talks about the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights to further express the Johnson’s action about the burning of the flag by saying his action were his freedom to do so. The Texas vs Johnson Majority Opinion and the editorial about the case similarly explains about the case of Johnson, on the contrary their tone of situation is different from each other. The Texas vs Johnson Majority Opinion’s tone was more analytical, however, the editorial’s tone was a thoughtful and…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Congress passed the Flag Protection Act of 1989, the Court upheld the Johnson ruling by deciding on the Eichman case in a 5-4 decision. Because the Supreme Court ruled on United States v. Eichman with the intention of completely respecting the Texas v. Johnson decision, it can be seen that judicial restraint was…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stomayor Speech Analysis

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sonia Sotomayor, a judge, in her speech Opening Statement to The Senate Judiciary Committee, describes her past and her accomplishments such as all of her experience being a judge and her nomination into the supreme court by president Obama. She writes about her experiences and shares her accomplishments so that her audience sees why she is a good candidate to be in the supreme court. Sotomayor’s purpose is to persuade and seek the support of the judges and America for her election into the supreme court. She supports her purpose with rhetorical appeals such as ethos and pathos. Sotomayor uses an optimistic tone and rhetorical appeals in order to convey her audience to vote for her to be in the Supreme court.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My primary career interest is in law, with my end goal being a federal judgeship. Within the past year, I have discovered, and not once doubted, my deep-seated passion in following the Supreme Court of the United States and its justices. Chief among the many personal truths I have discovered through my Court watching is that I relish genuine debate and reasoning. Indeed, the idea of sorting through legal texts and briefs while charged with the responsibility to settle a vigorous legal, and perhaps social, debate appeals greatly to me. This appeal is so great that I have, actually, put myself in the shoes of a judge by reading Court opinions – majorities, concurrences, and dissents – in full and extracting my own verdict.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nobody ever went to a ball game to see the umpire.’ In fact, judges often make decisions that go against their own political opinions simply because they are upholding laws or precedents that oppose them. For example, Justice Kennedy wrote of Texas v Johnson ‘The hard fact is that sometimes we must make decisions we do not like. We make them because they are right, right in the sense that the law and the Constitution, as we see them, compel the result.’. The vast majority of the work of judges is not deciding important social or political issues, but enforcing clearly set out laws or debating highly technical legal cases.…

    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays