Theories Of Altruism

Great Essays
People act in benign selfishness. A person wakes up, showers, eats, brushes his teeth, and preforms other activities to take care of himself. If selfishness is focusing on oneself and acting in a way that benefits oneself, then everyone should strive to be selfish. The opposition would argue that if each person acted selfish then the world would be an aggressive campaign to compete and do better against one another. That belief is caused by the word selfish being unclearly defined. Benign selfishness, egoism, promotes individual welfare without interfering with other’s resources or well-being.
Altruism is defined as the practice of fair-minded and selfless concern for the welfare of others. The driving factor of altruism is that a person does
…show more content…
Normative meaning establishing a standard, especially concerning behavior. Egoism is not the standard, but it does offer a theory of how people should behave. An egoist would state that something is good when he possesses it, but that would imply that goodness would be circumstantial, not universal. Egoism is qualified with phrases such as ethical or psychological. According to Machan, “the human self or ego consists of a bundle of desires (or drives or wishes or preferences) and to benefit oneself amounts to satisfying these desires in their order of priority, which is itself something entirely dependent upon the individual or, as it is often put, a subjective matter” (Machan 18) implying that it is understood that each individual desire is subjective to the person, but states that satisfying these desires benefits the person. Interest of others should not be the main factor in moral decision-making. Self-sacrifice is not a moral action, and should only be done when the person completing the action will benefit short term or long term. A justifiable reason to help others or act in self-sacrifice would be that one feels good because of the action the person took, which is an ethical behavior. The idea that charitable actions are done in benefit of the person receiving the charity is false. The motivation to help another person is too feel good, meaning the motivation stems from self-interest. The receiver’s benefit is the by-product meaning it was not a self-less act. For example, the wealthy that donate to charities. Those are not altruistic people, or selfless in that sense, because the motivation stems from their success and the appearance that they are good. According to Webster, the definition of sacrifice is to give up for the sake of other considerations and the definition of self-sacrifice is the giving up of one’s own interests in order to help others or to advance a cause. Therefore, people are not self-sacrificing or

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    One example of this would be the difference between the bread and books. The majority of Liesel’s books were stolen; many of them were taken from Ilsa Hermann’s library. This is a very selfish action, because she is taking something from someone else without permission, especially since it is something she doesn’t have to have. On the other hand, the bread given to the Jewish prisoner by Hans was an act of unselfishness because the Hubermann’s already do not have a large portion of food, and yet he is giving it…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Webster defines. ‘Altruism’ as an “unselfish regard for, or devotion to the welfare of others.” Leading an altruistic lifestyle is associated with happiness, well-being, a sense of worth, and perhaps, most importantly, has the potential to be contagious. In ‘The Good Person of Szechwan,’ while both Shui Ta and Shen Teh attempt to help others, their approaches and ultimately successes are very different. While money has the potential to create circumstances that promote goodness, the end result of a financial infusion is usually short-lived.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Claiming that the benefits of living in a society based on people’s rights and interest is a greater advantage then living without them. Even if you feel you could get away with it, an ethical egoist would claim it is too great a risk and will maintain the sort of society which they will benefit. The problem with this is that an ethical egoist cannot benefit in a world based on people’s rights if everyone also adopts the same way of thinking. How can you benefit from others if they are only out for themselves as well? In my eyes this is a world of chaos and cannot be adopted universally.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Altruism is a wonder characterized by French scholar Auguste Comte as conduct by a person that expands the wellness of another individual while diminishing the wellness of the performing artist. The coinage of this term suggested a troublesome conversation starter to the field of transformative science, as it negated with Charles Darwin's meaning of the system of natural selection. In The Origin of Species, Darwin clarifies the instrument of regular determination by expressing that "individuals having any advantage, however slight, over others, would have the best chance of surviving and procreating their kind" and "On the other hand, we may feel sure that any variation in the least degree injurious would be rigidly destroyed" (83). The presence…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Otherwise, individuals are concerned about being evaluated negatively for taking part in the altruistic behavior, when the costs of assisting outweigh those associated to not assisting, and when people are unable to find out a person in need. Moreover, the bystander effect gives implication to reduce its…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay, I will defend psychological egoism as the most probable explanation for moral choice and motivation. I hold psychological egoism to be “the view that all men are selfish in everything that they do, that is, that the only motive from which anyone ever acts is self-interest” (Rachels 233). Since every action is moved by a desire to be satisfied, even in supposedly altruistic acts, one acts on a desire to satisfy one’s desire, so that supposedly altruistic acts are not actually altruistic. James Rachels, to whom my defining of psychological egoism is attributed, counters psychological egoism as incorrect moral skepticism. In the form of a Platonic dialogue, I will present, if successful, the impossibility for any ‘moral’ conduct beyond psychological egoism, counteracting Rachels own refutation in his essay, “Egoism and Moral Scepticism.”…

    • 2217 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On September 11, 2001, The United States changed forever. On that morning four planes were hijacked and flown into three of the United States largest and important buildings. Two of the planes had flown into the Twin Towers, the stars of New York City. The other plane hit the Pentagon in Washington DC, with the last plane crashing into a field were the passengers did not allow the plane to get hijacked which was heading for The White House. The Twin Towers had around 17,000 people in them when the planes struck, those thousands of people were beginning their workday but instead had to begin fighting for their lives.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We are social creatures and altruism is at the core of who we are. A better life for anyone is a better life for everyone. As a society we can only move forward when everyone moves forward. As the famous proverb goes “A chain is only as strong as its weakest link.”…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Counter-Argument: Contrary to my beliefs, some people still think that making sacrifices is totally selfless. One-way that people can think that sacrifice is selfless is by the sacrifier’s intent. If you do not hope for a return and you are truly trying to help the good of the community, and you believe this with your whole heart, then your selflessness is motivated by pure intent rather than a drive to gain status in your community. You can be a vessel of generosity and your feeling is for humanity not yourself. Although others may perceive it as self-serving, they likely lack comprehension of the sacrifier’s intent.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To be selfish or to pursuit greatness only to make ourselves happy is what we as humans have in our blood and genetics. To only think about ourselves is the most efficient way for us to achieve and accomplish tasks and overcome difficulties. Therefore, every one of our actions is considered to be an act of selfishness since we do things only for the sake of our own pleasure and happiness. We tend to have this feeling that we can over power and are greater than everyone else, and we tend to think that especially when it comes to humans Vs. other animals in this world.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Effective Altruism

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the book, The Most Good You Can Do: How Effective Altruism Is Changing Ideas About Living Ethically, by Peter Singer, the author introduces readers to a new movement called “Effective Altruism”. As stated in his book, effective altruism is “a philosophy and social movement which applies evidence and reason to working out the most effective ways to improve the world.” (Singer, 4-5) To be able to practice effective altruism, the book offers several ideas to become an effective altruist such as living modestly to give more, earning to give, giving organs, donating to the most effective charities, and by viewing everyone’s suffering as equal including animals. While many of these strategies are beneficial to the greater good, some may also present…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument Essay RD Are people really good at heart? No, it was ironic how Anne, in “The Diary of Anne Frank” stated “In spite of everything, people are good at the heart.” She said that when she didn’t actually know what was going on outside of the annex, millions of jews were being killed, because of Hitler and the Germans. People are bad at heart. While some people are good at heart, no amount of good, can overcome the amount of evil in this world.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should a person donate his or her time and money simply because it is the right thing to do? These potentially unethical incentives can be anything from a few extra points in a class, a free T-shirt, or a federal…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the critique “Egoism and Altruism,” Louis P. Pojman strongly rejects the idea of Ayn Rand that everyone should have and egoist morality by explaining the “false dilemma” created between egoism and altruism. He explains that her idea of egoism stating that she believes “selfishness is a virtue and altruism is a vice.” He argues that while some egoist traits are morally necessary, such as self-love and self-interest, they should not be brought about or acted upon at the cost of someone else’s happiness. The idea that one ought to “love thy neighbor as yourself” means to treat everyone with the same respect and dignity that you treat yourself with, not to harm a stranger for your own happiness or joy. He argues against Rand’s theory by stating…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The theory of ethical egoism would say “The morally right act, for any particular situation, is the act that will produce the greatest amount of utility for oneself” as quoted from the book Ethical Choices (Burnor & Raley, 2013 pg.100). Ethical egoism would also make the argument that the theory is not as selfish as it may seem there is nothing that prohibits someone from helping another person out, as long as the action produces utility for the person that is completing the action (Burnor & Raley, 2013 pg.100). According to ethical egoism their theory shows a great deal of selflessness and focuses on what most people would consider morally acceptable. Ethical egoists claim that their theory is selfless because we can still help people as long as the action supports our own interest. Kant has an idea that the morally correct action is the thought of moral duty.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays