• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/23

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

23 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Ad ignorantiam
A fallicious form of though which follows the principle: because a claim has not been proven to be false, it must be true.
Ad populum
A fallicious form of thought which follows the principle: because a claim has been generally accepted to be true, it must be true.
Argumentum ad hominem
A fallicious form of thought which follows the principle: a claim is rejected because of some personal characteristic of the person putting forward a claim.
Hasty generalisation
A fallicious form of thought which follows the principle: making a generalisation on the basis of an inadequate set of cases.
One sided assessment
A fallicious form of thought which follows the principle: only dealing with the arguments for a proposition, or only dealing with the arguments against a proposition.
Petitio principii
A fallicious form of thought which follows the principle: use in an argument a proposition that the conclusion is supposed to establish.
Slippery slope
A fallicious form of thought which follows the principle: one step in a particular direction will inevitably and unavoidably lead to the whole distance being covered
False dilemma
A fallicious form of thought which follows the principle: two opposing alternatives presented as the only possible alternatives.
Genetic fallacy
A fallicious form of thought which follows the principle: When an idea is accepted or rejected based on its source rather than its merits.
Fallacy fallacy
A fallicious form of thought which follows the principle: A claim is supported by a fallacious argument, therefore the claim cannot be valid.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
A fallicious form of thought which follows the principle: X happened after Y, so X must have caused Y.
What does this mean?

P . Q
P and Q
What does this mean?

P Ξ Q
If and only if P then Q
What does this mean?

P v Q
P or Q
What does this mean?

P -> Q
If P then Q
What does this mean?

~ P
Not P
What is a substantive question?
Questions aimed at developing a deeper understanding of a topic.
What is a procedural question?
Questions which explore the structure of the logical thought behind something.
What is inference?
Extrapolating a logical conclusion from known premises.
What is a proximate cause?
The direct cause of an effect.
What is an ultimate cause?
The initial cause which triggered the casual chain.
What is equivocation?
Miss use of the ambiguity of words.
According to Harry Frankfurt, what is ********?
******** misrepresents what the ******** artist is up to irrelevant of truth or lies.