Intro To Logic-Chapter 3: Informal Falacies

Front 1

Fallacy of Relavance
1. APPEAL TO FORCE

Back 1

A THREAT

Front 2

Fallacy of Relavance
2. APPEAL TO PITY

Back 2

EMOTIONS

Front 3

Fallacy of Relavance
3.APPEAL TO THE PEOPLE (ad populum)
A:DIRECT

Back 3

SPEECH

Front 4

Fallacy of Relavance
3.APPEAL TO THE PEOPLE (ad populum)
B:INDIRECT
I:BANDWAGON

Back 4

EVERYONE DOES IT SO SHOULD YOU

Front 5

Fallacy of Relavance
3.APPEAL TO THE PEOPLE (ad populum)
B:INDIRECT
II:VANITY

Back 5

STANDING OUT

Front 6

Fallacy of Relavance
3.APPEAL TO THE PEOPLE (ad populum)
B:INDIRECT
III:SNOBERY

Back 6

WEALTH

Front 7

Fallacy of Relavance
4.AGAINST THE PERSON
(Ad hominem)
A:ABUSIVE

Back 7

(INVOLVES 2 PEOPLE)
ATACKING THE PERSON

Front 8

Fallacy of Relavance
4.AGAINST THE PERSON
(Ad hominem)
B:circumstantial

Back 8

ATTACKING A GROUP

Front 9

Fallacy of Relavance
4.AGAINST THE PERSON
(Ad hominem)
C:TU QUOQUE

Back 9

YOUR ANOTHER

Front 10

Fallacy of Relavance
5. ACCIDENT

Back 10

MISSPPLYING A GERNERAL RULE

Front 11

Fallacy of Relavance
6. STRAWMAN

Back 11

MISINTERPTS AN ARGUMENT AND EXARRATES IT

Front 12

Fallacy of Relavance
7.MISSING THE POINT

Back 12

DRAWING THE WRONG CONCLUSION
IMPLYS THAT THE PERIMES IS THE CONCLUSION

Front 13

Fallacy of Relavance
8.RED HERRING

Back 13

CHANGING THE SUBJECT

Front 14

Fallacies of Weak Induction
9.APPEALING TO INAPPROPRIATE AUTHORITY
A:NO EXPERTISE

Back 14

HAS NO BACKGROUND IN THE SUBJECT

Front 15

Fallacies of Weak Induction
9.APPEALING TO INAPPROPRIATE AUTHORITY
b:BIAS

Back 15

BIAS-a particular tendency or inclination, esp. one that prevents unprejudiced consideration of a question; prejudice.

Front 16

Fallacies of Weak Induction
9.APPEALING TO INAPPROPRIATE AUTHORITY
C:ALTERIOR MOTIVES

Back 16

HAS A REASON TO LIE

Front 17

Fallacies of Weak Induction
9.APPEALING TO INAPPROPRIATE AUTHORITY
D:INABILITY TO PERCIVE OR RECALL

Back 17

PERSON CANT SEE IT

Front 18

Fallacies of Weak Induction
10. APPEAL TO IGNORANCE

Back 18

"NO ONE HAS EVER PROVEN IT"-note* WITH HOLD JUDGEMENT

Front 19

Fallacies of Weak Induction
11.HASTY GENERALIZATION

Back 19

TAKES FEW EXAMPLES AND APLLIES IT TO THE WHOLE

Front 20

Fallacies of Weak Induction
12.FALSE CAUSE
A:PSOT HUC

Back 20

CAUSE AND EFFECT. GUESSING WHAT HAPPENS IN A SERIES OF EVENTS

Front 21

Fallacies of Weak Induction
12.FLASE CUASE
B:NON CAUSA

Back 21

DRAWING CORRALATION ENDING UP WITH THE WRONG CONCLUSION

Front 22

Fallacies of Weak Induction
12.FALSE CAUSE
C:OVERSIMPLIFACATION

Back 22

THE ANSWERS TO THESE FLASH CARDS HAHAHA.

Front 23

Fallacies of Weak Induction
13.SLIPPERY SLOPE

Back 23

SEQUENCE OF EVENTS THAT END UP WITH A UNPLASABLE CONCLUSION

Front 24

Fallacies of Weak Induction
14. WEAK ANALOGY

Back 24

A BAD CAMPARRISON

Front 25

Fallacies of Persumption
15. BEGGING THE QUESTION

Back 25

CIRCLEALAR REASONING
*NOTE* VAILD ARGUMENT

Front 26

Fallacies of Persumption
16.COMPLEX QUESTION

Back 26

2 QUESTIONS IN ONE. KIND OF OPEN ENDED. BUT SET UP LIKE A TRAP

Front 27

Fallacies of Persumption
17.FALSE DICHOTOMY

Back 27

BLACK OR WHITE REASONING -EX: EITHER YOUR WITH US OR AGAINST US

Front 28

Fallacies of Persumption
18.SUPPESSED EVIDENCE

Back 28

MAJOR DETAILS THAT ARE MISSING THAT MATTER TO THE ARGUMENT

Front 29

Fallacies of Ambuguity
19.EQUIVOCATION

Back 29

a fallacy caused by the double meaning of a word.

Front 30

Fallacies of Ambuguity
20.AMPHIBOLY

Back 30

from uncertainty of the grammatical construction rather than of the meaning of the words