Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
18 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
- 3rd side (hint)
|
Facial expression - intRApersonal consequence |
Strack et al., 1988 -Rate funniness of cartoons while holding between between lips (frown) vs. teeth (smile -Shows that subtle facial expressions can influence your affective state -facial feedback hypothesis |
Strack et al., 1988 |
|
|
Facial expression - intERpersonal consequence |
Sato et al., 2007 -judge affect of video tapes of mimickers facial expression -people can recognise FE of person who is non-consciously mimicking someone else |
Sato et al., 2007 |
|
|
NV behaviour - Synchrony |
Bernier, 1988 -people in social interaction tend to move their bodies in synchrony and similarly behavioural matching -pairs in synchrony tend to develop a rapport r=.74 -pairs showing behaviour matching did not r = -.04 |
Bernier, 1988 |
|
|
Non-referential behaviour |
not referring to objects other than themselves facial expression, mimicry non-verbal behaviour |
not referring to objects other than themselves |
|
|
NV - mimicry |
Chartrand & Bargh, 1999 -participants interact with confederate who rubs face, and another who shakes foot -behaviour shows mimicry per minute is high -when participant interacts with confederate who mimics nonverbal behaviour the likability and smoothness is higher |
Chartrand & Bargh, 1999 |
|
|
Social interaction affect balance |
Kahneman et al., 2004 -Participants rate number of positive and negative interactions with social groups -order: friends, relatives, SO, children, clients, co-workers, boss, alone |
Kahneman et al., 2004 |
|
|
Social interaction time |
Bruni & Stanca, 2008 -life satisfaction and frequency of time spent with others -family 2.1, friends 1.3, colleagues 0.76, church 0.56, service organisation 1.69 |
Bruni & Stanca, 2008 |
|
|
Happiness spread |
Framingham Heart Study -probability of ego being happy if someone connected to them is happy -probability greater than zero for 1-3 degrees of separation -if |
Framingham Heart Study |
|
|
Social interaction and mortality |
Berkman & Syme, 1979 -9 year study of social ties and mortality -greater social integration is associated with lower mortality -the fewer social ties (marriage, friends, relatives organisations) the more likely to die in the next 9 years |
Berkman & Syme, 1979 |
|
|
Referential Behaviour |
referring to objects other than themselves Joint Gaze Conversation |
referring to objects other than themselves |
|
|
Joint Gaze |
Frischen & Tipper, 2004 -humans can follow gaze from 12-18 months -gaze can automatically shift your attention |
Frischen & Tipper, 2004 |
|
|
Conversation |
-successful conversation is when conceptions are shared -occurs with joint activity -used as information sharing |
|
|
|
Grounding Model - overview |
common ground: shared conceptions in conversation grounding: adding a new mutual understand to common ground grounding activity costs of one's presentation of an idea and another's acceptance of it |
|
|
|
Referential Communication - Dyad |
Garrod et al., 2007 Dyad given list of objects, draw pictures and identify object, repeated over and over in 6 blocks. Results showed that common grounding images repeated and simplified as game progressed |
Garrod et al., 2007 |
|
|
Referential Communication - community |
Fay et al., 2010 developed into communities on picture drawing/guseesing game each community came up with it's own way of expressing different communication systems |
Fay et al., 2010 |
|
|
Social Sharing - emotion |
Harber & Cohen, 2005 students visiting morgue, higher recorded emotional experience, predicted subsequent sharing Heath et al., 2001 urban legends, more disgusting more they are shared |
Harber & Cohen, 2005 Heath et al., 2001 |
|
|
Social influence - Political opinion |
Huckfeldt & Sprague, 1991 -interaction partner's pol preference is related to one's pol preference Huckfeldt et al., 1995 -perceived support for candidate was influenced by non-relative interaction partner -interaction partners political opinion form a basis of one's descriptive norms |
Huckfeldt & Sprague, 1991 Huckfeldt et al., 1995 |
|
|
Schultz et al., 2007 |
-Study looking at normative messages on household energy usage, with additional conjunctive message (social approval or disapproval) -subjects received their HEC (household energy) and normative information of others in their neighbourhood -households divided into high and low consumption, some received normative info others received normative info and conjunctive message conveying approval or disapproval -high houses energy lowered -low energy houses had a boomerang effect -having conjunctive message eliminated boomerang effect in low energy houses |
Constructive, Destructive and Reconstructive power of social norms |
