Test 2

Front 1

ethics

Back 1

the study of morality

Front 2

morality

Back 2

standards of good and evil

Front 3

euthanasia

Back 3

mercy killing

Front 4

theological

Back 4

find out the difference between right and wrong

Front 5

consequentalist

Back 5

what is right and wrong depends on the consequence

Front 6

nonconsequentialist

Back 6

whats right and wrong is in itself

Front 7

virtue ethics

Back 7

character development, role models, etc

Front 8

cultural relativism

Back 8

describes what comes out of the world's behavior

Front 9

ethical relativism

Back 9

societies have different standards, so correct morality is subject to that person's society

Front 10

ethical absolutism

Back 10

there is only one correct set of morals that everyone should follow

Front 11

hedonism

Back 11

pleasure is the only thing worth having for its sake and has intrinsic value. it is right to seek your own pleasure.

Front 12

intrinsic

Back 12

value on the inside

Front 13

extrinsic

Back 13

a means to an end

Front 14

epicurus

Back 14

hedonist, consequentialist. people should live to produce as much pleasure for themselves as possible

Front 15

utilitarianism

Back 15

bentham and mills. good is what is good for the most people

Front 16

kant

Back 16

found faults in utilitarianism, you never know the consequences that will happen after your action, so you cant tell whats right or wrong based off that. do do good works you have to have the right mindset.

Front 17

kant's hypothetical imperative

Back 17

"if i do this, then this will happen"

Front 18

kant's categorical imperative

Back 18

a priori. act as to treat humanity as people, not as objects or a means to something else

Front 19

bentham

Back 19

act utilitarianist. the end justifies the mean. what is right will promote pleasure, what is wrong will promote pain.

Front 20

taylor

Back 20

"having love affairs" any action is good if it promotes pleasure over pain. lying (affairs) are ok if concealing the truth would bring less pain. act utilitarianist

Front 21

ramsey colloquium

Back 21

morals that allow divorce, etc can be harmful on families. rule utilitarianism

Front 22

mill

Back 22

rule utilitarianist. right actions that follow the moral rule that brings happiness and less pain. the body is no more than an instrument for the fullfilment of desire.

Front 23

freudian model

Back 23

release of tension is good for you

Front 24

sartian model

Back 24

there is a competition for dominance between male and female

Front 25

interrelationship model

Back 25

we all desire contact with others, rejection causes pain

Front 26

religious model

Back 26

procreation

Front 27

romantic model

Back 27

there's one person for everyone

Front 28

empathy model (dr cording model)

Back 28

feeling with not being used or treated as an object. people are vulnerable.

Front 29

nonconsequentialist ethics

Back 29

kant, we should always do the will of God, if we disobey it will be wrong

Front 30

divine command theory

Back 30

we should always do the will of God

Front 31

catagorical comparative theory

Back 31

we should only do something if we want it to become a law

Front 32

buddhism

Back 32

tons of rules dictating what you should and shouldnt do, basically treat others above yourself

Front 33

natural law ethics

Back 33

people should live according to nature. zeno, aquinas, epitetus, finnis

Front 34

finnis 7 tendencies

Back 34

life, knowledge, aesthetic experience, friendships, practical reasonableness, religion, play

Front 35

aristotle

Back 35

we should act in accordance with reason. virtue is to avoid bad habits.

Front 36

kolberg

Back 36

preconventional: follows authority figures to avoid punishment
conventional: being accepted by people who follow rules
post conventional: questions conventional, morality= human welfare, justice, rights. women are less moral than men due to loyalties

Front 37

gilligan

Back 37

women care for themselves first and others second and both third. morality is based on human welfare, justice, and rights.

Front 38

aristole- love

Back 38

philia (brotherly love)
enos (passionate love)
agape (God love)

Front 39

excusability ethics

Back 39

ignorance of consequences can be excused, but ignorance for the law cant.

Front 40

nietchzie

Back 40

if there is no God, then there is no morality. slave morality: those who dont have power, emphasis on heaven. Master morality: emphasis on nobility

Front 41

Kraft

Back 41

all humans posess reason which is the source of moral rights. reason sets us apart from the animals. society keeps women below men which is wrong. she says all humans posess reason so we are all equal

Front 42

singer

Back 42

if its in our power to prevent bad from happening and it wont commit more sacrifice then we should do it.

Front 43

specieism

Back 43

all animals are equal

Front 44

aquinas

Back 44

what we think is good was built into us by God. principle of double effect.

Front 45

epictetus

Back 45

we have a natural tendency to judge what is right and wrong for ourselves

Front 46

rule utilitarianism

Back 46

an action is right if it follows moral rules that will produce more pleasure and less pain if followed by everyone

Front 47

principle of double effect

Back 47

if an action will cause good and bad, it is ok to do the action and let the bad happen as long as your intentions are good

Front 48

act utilitarianism

Back 48

the right action is the one that produces more pleasure and less pain if followed by everyone