• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/18

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

18 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
actor-observer difference
differences in attribution based on who is making the causal assessment: the actor (makes situational attributions) or the observer (makes dispositional attributions)
attribution
linking a cause to an instance of behavior
attribution theory
people assign cuases to the events around them and the effects that people's causal assessments have
augmentation theory
the idea that we should assign greater weight to a paritcular cause of behavior if there are other causes present that normally would produce the opposite outcome
augmentation principle
the idea that we shoudl assign greater weight to a particular cause of behavior if there are other causes present that normally would produce the opposite outcome
consensus
refers to what most people would do in a given situation that is whether most people would behave the same way or few or noother people would behave that way
consistency
refers to what an individual does in a given situation on difference occassions that is whether next time the behavior under the same circumstances would be the smae or would differ
counterfactual thoughts
thoughts of hwat might have could have or should have happened if only something had been done differently
correspondance bias
the tendneyc to draw an inference about a person that corresonds to the behavior observed, also referred to s the fundamental attirubution error
covariation principle
the idea that we should attribute behavior to potential cuases that cooccur with the behavior
discounting princple
the idea that we should assign reduced weight to a particular cause of behavior if there are other plausible causes that might have produced it
distinctiveness
refers to what an individual does in a different situations that is whether the behavior is unique to a parituclar situation or occurs in all situation
emotional amplification
a ratcheting up of an emotional reaction to an event that is proportional to how easy it is to imagine the event no happening
explanatory style
a person's habitual way of explaining events, typically assessed along three dimensions: internality/externality, stability/instability and globality/specificity
false consensus effect
the tendency for people to think their behavior is relatively common
fundamental attributino error
believing that behavior is due to a person's disposition rather htan the situation which the person finds himself
just world hypothesis
the belief that people get what they deserve in life and deserve what they get
self-serving bias
the tendency to attribute failure and other bad events to external circumstances but to attribute success and other good events to oneself