Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
18 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
actor-observer difference
|
differences in attribution based on who is making the causal assessment: the actor (makes situational attributions) or the observer (makes dispositional attributions)
|
|
attribution
|
linking a cause to an instance of behavior
|
|
attribution theory
|
people assign cuases to the events around them and the effects that people's causal assessments have
|
|
augmentation theory
|
the idea that we should assign greater weight to a paritcular cause of behavior if there are other causes present that normally would produce the opposite outcome
|
|
augmentation principle
|
the idea that we shoudl assign greater weight to a particular cause of behavior if there are other causes present that normally would produce the opposite outcome
|
|
consensus
|
refers to what most people would do in a given situation that is whether most people would behave the same way or few or noother people would behave that way
|
|
consistency
|
refers to what an individual does in a given situation on difference occassions that is whether next time the behavior under the same circumstances would be the smae or would differ
|
|
counterfactual thoughts
|
thoughts of hwat might have could have or should have happened if only something had been done differently
|
|
correspondance bias
|
the tendneyc to draw an inference about a person that corresonds to the behavior observed, also referred to s the fundamental attirubution error
|
|
covariation principle
|
the idea that we should attribute behavior to potential cuases that cooccur with the behavior
|
|
discounting princple
|
the idea that we should assign reduced weight to a particular cause of behavior if there are other plausible causes that might have produced it
|
|
distinctiveness
|
refers to what an individual does in a different situations that is whether the behavior is unique to a parituclar situation or occurs in all situation
|
|
emotional amplification
|
a ratcheting up of an emotional reaction to an event that is proportional to how easy it is to imagine the event no happening
|
|
explanatory style
|
a person's habitual way of explaining events, typically assessed along three dimensions: internality/externality, stability/instability and globality/specificity
|
|
false consensus effect
|
the tendency for people to think their behavior is relatively common
|
|
fundamental attributino error
|
believing that behavior is due to a person's disposition rather htan the situation which the person finds himself
|
|
just world hypothesis
|
the belief that people get what they deserve in life and deserve what they get
|
|
self-serving bias
|
the tendency to attribute failure and other bad events to external circumstances but to attribute success and other good events to oneself
|