Rec 340 Exam 2

Front 1

Population

Back 1

Entire set of entities

Front 2

Sample

Back 2

Subset of population

Front 3

Sampling frame

Back 3

Listing of all the elements in a population

Front 4

Probability sampling

Back 4

Every unit has the same chance of being chosen

Representative

Front 5

Non-probability

Back 5

People are chosen by accident or due to convenience

Front 6

Simple random sample

Back 6

Randomly selected

Front 7

Systematic random sampling

Back 7

Every nth person

Front 8

Validity

Back 8

Accuracy

Front 9

Volunteer sampling

Back 9

Convenience

Front 10

Quota

Back 10

Recruits from subgroups

Front 11

Front (Term)

Experts

Back 11

Most knowledgeable

Front 12

Snowball

Back 12

Chain of suggestions from volunteers

Front 13

Sampling error

Back 13

Doesn't reflect on the population

Front 14

Sampling error

Back 14

Doesn't reflect on the population

Front 15

Coverage errors

Back 15

Non- representative of the populations

Front 16

Non-response error

Back 16

Didn't answer all the questions

Front 17

5 qualities of a classic experimental design

Back 17

Random selection

Experimental group

random assignment

Pre test

Post test

Front 18

Causality

Back 18

A cause

Front 19

Correlation

Back 19

The cause

Front 20

Internal validity

Back 20

Info is valid for that group

Front 21

External validity

Back 21

Info is valid for others

Front 22

Sampling generalization

Back 22

Want to generalize from sample to the population from which the sample came

Front 23

Case study

Back 23

Concentrated descriptive study of a specific unit of analysis in order to explain who things are happening

Front 24

Case study

Back 24

Concentrated descriptive study of a specific unit of analysis in order to explain who things are happening

Front 25

Critical theory

Back 25

Incorporates a subjective and interpretative view of social reality through meanings and interpretations provided by individuals

Front 26

Case study

Back 26

Concentrated descriptive study of a specific unit of analysis in order to explain who things are happening

Front 27

Critical theory

Back 27

Incorporates a subjective and interpretative view of social reality through meanings and interpretations provided by individuals

Front 28

Ethnographic study

Back 28

In depth study of a group or culture

Front 29

Grounded theory

Back 29

An approach designed to construct theory from qualitative data

Front 30

Narrative

Back 30

Asking individuals to provide stories

Front 31

Phenomenology

Back 31

Both a way of doing research and a way of questioning and conceptualizing thought

Front 32

Logic of measurement

Back 32

Identifying a concept

Select a variable that is related to the chosen concept

Choose an instrument to measure

Determine the unit of measurement

Front 33

Validity

Back 33

Accuracy

Front 34

Validity

Back 34

Accuracy

Front 35

Reliability

Back 35

Consistency over time

Front 36

Criterion validity types

Back 36

Concurrent validity

Predictive validity

Convergent validity

Discriminat vaidity

Front 37

Concurrent validity

Back 37

Groups of people score differently on the construct in expected ways

Front 38

Predictive validity

Back 38

For tells a future outcome or event

Front 39

Predictive validity

Back 39

For tells a future outcome or event

Front 40

Convergent validity

Back 40

New measure is correlated to a previously validated instrument that was designed to measure the same variable

Front 41

Predictive validity

Back 41

For tells a future outcome or event

Front 42

Convergent validity

Back 42

New measure is correlated to a previously validated instrument that was designed to measure the same variable

Front 43

Discrimination validity

Back 43

New measure does not correlate with a previously validated instrument designed to measure a different variable

Front 44

Triangulation

Back 44

Multiple measurement tools can be used to determine if findings are supported or contradicted. Both quantitative and qualitative data collection

Front 45

Types of close ended questions

Back 45

Dichotomous

Likert scale

Semantic differential

Forced ranking

Adjective checklist

Multiple choice

Smiley face continuum

Front 46

Dichotomous

Back 46

Yes or no

True or fase

Front 47

Dichotomous

Back 47

Yes or no

True or fase

Front 48

Likert scale

Back 48

Strongly agree to strongly disagree

Front 49

Dichotomous

Back 49

Yes or no

True or fase

Front 50

Likert scale

Back 50

Strongly agree to strongly disagree

Front 51

Semantic differential

Back 51

Scale set up between bipolar words

Front 52

Dichotomous

Back 52

Yes or no

True or fase

Front 53

Likert scale

Back 53

Strongly agree to strongly disagree

Front 54

Semantic differential

Back 54

Scale set up between bipolar words

Front 55

Forced ranking

Back 55

Rank each option

Front 56

Adjective checklist

Back 56

Rate or judge something

Front 57

Multiple choice

Back 57

When question offers two or more choices

Front 58

Multiple choice

Back 58

When question offers two or more choices

Front 59

Smiley face continuum

Back 59

Provides an array of faces ranging from happy to sad

Front 60

6 ethical principles

Back 60

Nonmalefinence

Beneficence

Respect

Honesty

Justice

Competences

Front 61

6 ethical principles

Back 61

Nonmalefinence

Beneficence

Respect

Honesty

Justice

Competences

Front 62

Nonmaleficence

Back 62

Do no harm doctrine

Front 63

Beneficence

Back 63

Promoting welfare to individuals

Front 64

Beneficence

Back 64

Promoting welfare to individuals

Front 65

Respect

Back 65

Recognizes right of individuals to decide about whether and to what extent they participate

Front 66

Beneficence

Back 66

Promoting welfare to individuals

Front 67

Respect

Back 67

Recognizes right of individuals to decide about whether and to what extent they participate

Front 68

Honesty

Back 68

Trustworthiness

Front 69

Beneficence

Back 69

Promoting welfare to individuals

Front 70

Respect

Back 70

Recognizes right of individuals to decide about whether and to what extent they participate

Front 71

Honesty

Back 71

Trustworthiness

Front 72

Justice

Back 72

Addressing the issues of fairness in receiving the benefits of research as well as bearing the burdens of accepting risks

Front 73

Competence

Back 73

Individual is qualifies by training and experience to conduct the research

Front 74

Common approval entities for research proposals

Back 74

Study site

Thesis/dissertation committees

Institutional review board

Funding sponsors

Front 75

IRB

Back 75

To determine if the researcher is treating study participants ethically

Front 76

IRB criteria

Back 76

Risks to participants

Benefits are greater than risks

Vulnerable populations are carefully selected and dealt with

Right to informed concent

Front 77

Expedited review

Back 77

Occurs when proposed study does not present more than minimal risk to human subjects and doesn't involve vulnerable population

Front 78

Non expedited review

Back 78

Vulnerable subjects or controversial interventions or data collection techniques are proposed

Full IRB meeting

Front 79

Quantitative approaches

Back 79

Experimental designs

Quasi-experimental

Pre-experimental

Single subject

Non-experimental

Front 80

Qualitative theoretical approach

Back 80

Case study

Critical theory

Ethnography

Grounded theory

Narrative

Phenomenology