Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
12 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Shelley v. Kraemer 1948 |
Restrictive covenants became unconstitutional, infringes on individual’s property rights rather than…, but not approaching from racial discrimination, maintains de facto racial segregation |
|
|
Serrano v. Priest 1971 |
unequal funding based on local property tax was ruled to be unconstitutional |
|
|
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg |
Busing decision within school district, must impose integration. Limitation due to white flight. Busing students to promote integration became constitutional |
|
|
San Antonio v. Rodriguez |
Ruled that education is a state matter that should be resolved at the state level rather than the federal level. San Antonio’s financing system based off of property taxes became unconstitutional |
|
|
Milliken v. Bradley |
interdistrict busing system is not required. Segregation is allowed if it was not considered an explicit policy of the school district |
|
|
DeRolph V. State of Ohio |
Ruled that the states method of for funding public education was unconstitutional; Also similar decisions in Vermont, New Hampshire, Arizona |
|
|
Oklahoma Board of Education V. Dowell |
School districts can be released from court-mandated busing once they taken all ‘practicable’ steps to eliminate the legacy of segregation |
|
|
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 1978 |
upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy, however, the court ruled that holding specific quotas for the number of minorities that can be reserved was impermissible |
|
|
Parents v. Seattle School District 2007 |
unconstitutional to assign students to public schools for the purpose of achieving racial integration and declined to reorganize racial balancing as a compelling state interest |
|
|
Grutter v. Bollinger 2003 |
upheld the affirmative action admissions policy of the University of Michigan’s Law School, ruled that Michigan had a compelling interest in promoting class diversity. Said that the Michigan system was not a quota system so it was allowed |
|
|
Gratz v. Bollinger 2003 |
University's point system's "predetermined point allocations" that awarded 20 points to underrepresented minorities "ensures that the diversity contributions of applicants cannot be individually assessed" and was therefore unconstitutional. |
|
|
Mendez v. Westminster |
held that the segregation of Mexicans and Mexican Americans students into separate Mexican schools is unconstitutional |
