Public Speaking 17

Front 1

3 powerful tools of Persuasive Speaking

Back 1

Ethos
Pathos
Logos

Front 2

Ethos

Back 2

Establishing Credibility

Front 3

Pathos

Back 3

Emotional appeal

Front 4

Logos

Back 4

Logical appeal

Front 5

Citing trusted researchers would be an example of Ethos, Pathos, or logos

Back 5

Ethos

Front 6

Presenting statistics is an example of Ethos, Pathos, or Logos

Back 6

Logos

Front 7

Practical Wisdom =

Back 7

Competence

Front 8

Virtue=

Back 8

Trustworthiness

Front 9

Three elements of Credibility

Back 9

Competence, Trustworthiness,Goodwill

Front 10

Wanting what is best for your listners rather than what would most benifit you

Back 10

Goodwill

Front 11

Speakers who understand Goodwill:

Back 11

-Understand listeners needs and feelings
-Empathize with audiences views
-Respond quickly to others communication

Front 12

Six ways to build credibility

Back 12

-share qualifications
-strong evidence from good sources
-common ground
-choose words carefully
-respect for conflicting opinions
-practice for fluent delivery

Front 13

4 things that hurt your credibility

Back 13

-Getting your facts wrong
-Pronouncing words incorrectly
-Failing to acknowledge potential conflicts of interest
-stretching to find a connection with audience

Front 14

The evidence and reasoning behind your facts

Back 14

Logos

Front 15

Proof

Back 15

Evidence

Front 16

When your audience analysis suggests that listners may not accept a claim you want to make what should you do?

Back 16

Supply proof

Front 17

Persuasive Speakers typically use what kind of reasoning

Back 17

Inductive

Front 18

Inductive Reasoning

Back 18

Generalizing from facts, instances, or examples then making a claim based on that generalization

Front 19

4 Types of inductive reasoning

Back 19

Example, Comparison, Sign,Casual

Front 20

To present specific instances to support a general claim

Back 20

Example Reasoning

Front 21

Representative Examples

Back 21

Examples that are typical of the class they represent

Front 22

To argue that two instances are similar, what you know is true for one instance is likely to be true for the other.

Back 22

Comparison Reasoning

Front 23

Claiming that a fact is true because indirect indicators(signs) are consistent with that fact.

Back 23

Sign Reasoning

Front 24

3 Steps to support causal reasoning

Back 24

1.exp. link b/w cause and effect
2.Provide Evidence
3.Demonstrate correlation

Front 25

If you replace your opponent's real claim witha weaker claim you can more easily rebut

Back 25

Straw Person Fallacy

Front 26

If you argue against a policy because you assume without proof that it will lead to some second policy that is undesirable

Back 26

Slippery Slope Fallacy

Front 27

Which types of Fallacy can distract the audience from the real issue at hand

Back 27

Slippery Slope Fallacy and Straw Person Fallacy

Front 28

If you claim that there are only tow possible choices to address a problem and that one is wrong therefore the other is correct by default

Back 28

False Dilemma Fallacy

Front 29

If you argue that an idea or policy is good simply because people have accepted or followed it for a long time

Back 29

Appeal to Tradition Fallacy

Front 30

The primary motivating system of all activity

Back 30

Pathos

Front 31

An argument that arouses fear in the minds of audience members

Back 31

Fear Appeal

Front 32

fear appeal succeeds if you ..

Back 32

make your audience afraid and then show them a solution

Front 33

Effective ___ ____ can strengthen the power of an emotional appeal

Back 33

Word Choice

Front 34

When emotionally charged words convey meaning that cannot be supported by facts presented by the speaker

Back 34

Loaded language fallacy