• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/37

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

37 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
DSM-I
-1952
-Categories based on lists of symptoms
-106 Diagnoses
DSM-II
-1968
-Communication key purpose
-Personality Disorders
DSM-III
-1980
-16 Categories
-Research Diagnostic Criteria
-Multiaxial Scheme
DSM-III-R
-1987
-Field Trials
-Assessment tools: Structured Clinical Interview
DSM-IV
-Clear descriptions
-Criteria reflect consensus
-Used for records, compiling stats, 3rd party reporting
DSM-IV-TR
-2000
-16 Categories, 400 Disorders
-5 Axes, Four diagnostic sections
Axis I
-Principle diagnoses
-Anxiety, mood, psychotic, etc. disorders
Axis II
-Personality disorders and mental retardation
-Long-standing problems
Axis III
-Relevant general medical conditions (GMCs)
Axis IV
-Psychosocial and environmental problems
Axis V
-Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF)
-0-100 scale
GAF
1-70 Typical range for patients
1-40 Inpatient
31-70 Outpatient
0 Inadequate info to derive score
Principle Diagnosis
-Reason for the visit
-Assumed to be Axis I unless Axis II diagnosis specifies "principle diagnosis"
Provisional Diagnosis
-Strong presumption that full criteria will ultimately be met for a disorder
-DO NOT USE IF YOU HAVE DONE AN ASSESSMENT!!
Differential Diagnosis
-Process of choosing the correct diagnosis from conditions with similar features
Prognosis
-Natural course of the disorder or the predicted outcome
-Affected by patient's highest prior level of functioning, duration, abruptness of onset, age of onset, availability of treatment, compliance, and outside support
Etiology
-Origin of the disorder
-Four P's: Predisposition, Precipitation, Provocation, Perpetuation
Idiopathic
Etiology = Unknown causation
Iatrogenic
Etiology = Physician induced illness
Multicausality
Etiology = Disorders have multiple causes
Omnicausality
Etiology = Anything can cause
Prevalence
- # of cases
- # of ppl with disorder
- Affected by TREATMENT
Incidence
- # of NEW cases
- # of ppl developing the disorder
- Affected by PREVENTION PROGRAMS
Paradigms in Psychopathology
- Conceptual framework to examine phenomena
- SET OF BASIC ASSUMPTIONS
Biological Paradigm
- Disease model
- Diathesis-stress model
- Abnormal behavior = Brain chemistry
- Treatment = Drugs, ECT, psychosurgery
Psychodynamic Paradigm
- Abnormal behavior = Unresolved conflicts
- One of the oldest
- Developmental Stages
Behavioral Paradigm
- Began in Laboratories
- ALL behavior = Conditioning
- Modeling
Cognitive Paradigm
- How we ORGANIZE and INTERPRET information
- Maladaptive thinking causes maladaptive behavior
- Beck's Cognitive Therapy
Humanistic Paradigm
- UNCONDITIONAL POSITIVE REGARD and conditions of worth
- Fritz Perls
- Skillful frustration, role playing, rules for language
Existential Theories and Therapy
- Psychological dysfunction caused by self-deception
- Therapy = Patient acceptance of personal responsibility and recognition of freedom of action
Clinical Interview Composition
- Identifying data
- Presenting problem
- Psychological History
- Psychiatric History
- Medical History
- SCID
Clinical Interview Pos/Neg
++ Observe verbal & non-verbal cues as well as emotional state
- - Paradigm influences questions asked, may not get enough or right info
Structured Clinical Interview
- High reliability and validity
- Decreased flexibility
- Miss idiosyncratic info
- Increase defensiveness & resistance
- Allows comparability
- Used in research/clinical settings
- Computer administered/scoring
Unstructured Clinical Interview
- Lower reliability and validity
- Increased flexibility
- Pick up idiosyncratic info
- Increased rapport
- Create favorable changes
Baumeister Study
- Most frequent disorders = Mood, anxiety, substance, somatoform
- Risk factors = Female, unemployed, unmarried, low SES
Kendell & Jablensky Study
- Reliability of diagnoses has increased dramatically
- Diagnoses may not be valid BUT still possess high utility
- Diagnostic categories only valid if they can be truly separated from each other
Communicating Diagnostic Uncertainty
- Rule-out
- NOS
- V codes