• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/25

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

25 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Sensory encoding

All the senses

Sensory capacity

Couple of seconds

Sensory duratjon

Limited

Short term encoding

Visual and auditory

STM capacity

5-9 chunks of info

STM duration

15-18 seconds

STM studies

Duration- Peterson and Peterson


Capacity- Miller and Cown and Jacobs


Encoding- baddely

LTM Encoding

Semantic

LTM capacity

Unlimited

LTM duration

Unlimited

Studies for LTM

Encoding- Baddely


Duration-Bahrick et al

Peterson and Peterson aim

Investigate duration of STM and provide evidence for MULTI STORY MODEL

P+P procedure

Nonsense trigrams and asked to recall after 3, 6, 9, 12, 18. During the pause they were given an interference task by counting back in 3's. This stopped the pp's from repeating the trigrams to themselves

Results of P+P

80% correct after 3 seconds, after 18 seconds only 10% correct

Conclusion of P+P

If rehearsal is prevented, little can stay in the STM after 18 seconds

Eval of P and P

Lab experiment - reliable tightly controlled variables


Lacks ecological validity


No meaning

Miller?

Found that people can remember about 7 items, he argues that the capacity is 7+\-2 and that's 'millers magic number'. Suggests chunking.

what is chunking?

Combining individual letters and numbers into larger more meaningful units

Cowen?

Evaluative point for miller. Says capacity is more like 4 items and millers over estimation might be due to some rehearsal still happening and the experiment would still be straying LTM

Baddely. Badd

Long term and Short term encoding

Baddely ajm

Exploring effects of acoustic and semantic coding in STM and LTM

Baddely method

Pp's were given 4 sets of words that were either acoustically similar, accloustically dissmiliar, semantically similar and semantically dissmiliar. Independent groups design - asked to either recall straight away or after 20 minutes

Baddely results

Problems recalling acoustically similar words when recalling immediately (from STM) but when recalling after an interval, they had problems with semantically similar words

Conclusion of Baddely

The patterns of confusion between similar words suggest that the LTM is more semantic encoding, and the STM is acoustic encoding

Eval of Baddely

Lacks Eco validity


Experiment doesn't consider different types of LTM


Independent groups design - any control of participant variables