• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/32

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

32 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Coding in STM and LTM

Baddeley - acoustically similar and semantically similar word lists


STM was acoustic


LTM semantic

Capacity of STM

Jacobs - ppts repeats digit lists


9.3 correct numbers 7.3 letters



Miller - observations of everyday practice - many 7s


Capacity of STM is 7+-2 items

Duration of STM

Peterson *2


Trigram then counting back from number


After 18 second interval recall fell to 3%


STM without rehearsal is 18 to 30 seconds

Duration of LTM

Bahrick et Al - 392 Americans aged 17 to 74


Recognition test of yearbook photos


Free recall of names


Ppts 70% accurate after 48 years


Multi-store model

Evaluate Multi-store model

Strength - research support


Baddeley's coding research clearly shows the different stores through the different coding



Limitation - more types of STM


KF could recall written info not echoic



Limitation - over simplifies LTM


Evidenc eto show different types - episodic, semantic and procedural

Episodic memory

Time stamped events


Consiscious effort needed for recall

Semantic memory

Knowledge of concepts and objects

Procedural memory

How to perform and action.


Hard to explain with forced recall

Working memory model

Evaluate the working memory model

Strength - KF supports separate STM stores



Strength - dual task experiments


Baddeley found ppts to have more difficulties doing 2 visual task than 1 visual 1 verbal



Strength - brain scans


Activity in the prefrontal cortex when using the central executive


Activity increased with task difficulty

Proactive interference

When and older memory interrupts a new one

Retroactive interference

When a new memory affects an old one

Describe McGeoch and McDonald's 1931 similarity study

Ppts asked to learn a word list to 100% then given another


Synonyms, antonyms, unrelated, trigrams, 3digit numbers, no new list


Worst recall with most similar material (synonyms)


Show that interference strongest with similar memories

Evaluated McGeoch and McDonald's 1931 study

Limitation - artificial materials


Not realistic so harder to generalise



Limitation - time allowed between learning


Research reduces the experience to very short time


Not realistic so hard to generalise



Limitation - affects overcome with cues


When lists were organised into topics and topic names given recall was much higher


Therefore using cues can overcome interference

Encoding specificity principle

Tulving suggested that cues present at encoding will help with retrieval if also present

Describe Godden and Baddeley's 1975 context dependant forgetting study

Divers learning a world list underwater or on land and than tested in a different condition


Recall was 30% lower in not matching conditions


Lack of cues leads to retrieval failure

Evaluate retrieval failure for forgetting

Strength - research support


Baddeley's divers


Argued this to be main reason for forgetting


High validity of explanation



Limitation - IRL effects weak


Baddeley argues contexts have to be very different to cause effects


So IRL this isn't very common



Limitation - encoding cannot be tested


When a cue doesn't help we assume it wasn't encoding but there is no way of testing this this leads to circular reasoning

Context dependant forgetting

Cue is a place or the weather

State dependant forgetting

Retival cue is a mental state e.g. Drunk or upset

Describe Loftus and Palmer's 1974a car crash study

45 ppts watched film of a car crash


Asked how fast car speed at contact


Caring the verbs to be:hit, contacted, bumped, collide, smashed


Smashed produced a mean speed 10mph higher than hit did

Post event discussion

When witnessed discuss and event. This can cause memory contamination

Memory conformity

When witnesses go along with other's memories

Describe Gabbert et Al's post event discussion study

Paired ppts watched video of same crime from different view points


They discussed their observations b4 completing and short test on the video


70% mistakenly recorded aspects from the other person

Evaluate misleading information

Limitation - artificial materials


Studies use videos which is very different to witnessing the event


Yuille and Cutshall found IRL robbery witnesses had very accurate recall 4months later



Limitation - own age bias


All age groups were more accurate when identifying their own group


Studies often use young people to be identified



Limitation - lack external validity


Real eyewitnesses search their memory due to real world consequences

Describe Johnson and Scott's 1976 anxiety study

Ppts in waiting room for study when an argument is overheard. Man walks out either carrying a greasy pen or a bloody letter opener


50% could identify with low anxiety whereas only 33% in high anxiety

Tunnel theory of memory

Witnesses attention is on weapon because it is source of danger and anxiety

Describe Yuille and Cutshall's gun shop robbery study

13 witnesses to a gun shop robbery were interviewed at the time and 4-5 months later. Witnesses were very accurate and were more so with higher levels of self reported stress

Yerkes - Dodson law

Evaluated anxiety memory studies

Limitation - surprise not anxiety


Pickel's barbershop study



Limitation - field studies lack variable control


Extraneous variable will affect ppts recalll



Limitation - ethical issues


Creating anxiety in ppts is might cause harm


This doesn't challenge finding but does question conduction of studies

Cognitive interview

Report everything


Reinstate context


Reverse order


Change perspective



Enhanced


Focus on social dynamics


Reducing anxiety and open questions

Evaluate cognitive interview

Strength - some elements best


each element found to be equally valuable but report everything and context reinstatement combined was best



Limitation - time consuming



Limitation - variation


All researchers and police used different variations so it is difficult to draw overall conclusions