• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/89

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

89 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
intelligence
mental qualitiy consisting of the ability to learn from experience, solve problems, and use knowledge to adapt to new situations
*culturally defined
spearmans g
general intelligence
general problem solving and basic knowledge
mental retardation
IQ below 70 and impairment of basic life skills
mild retardation
50-70
6th grade skills
moderate retardation
35-50
2nd grade skills
severe retardation
20-35
profound retardation
below 20
einstein
160-180
unique perspective
hawking
wheelchair, can't speak
(260-280)
spearman's g doesn't tell us
computers
athletics
street smarts vs book smarts
communications
problem solving
Gardner's eight intelligences
linguistic
logical/mathematical
musical
spatial
bodily/kinesthetic
intrapersonal: knowledge of oneself
interpersonal: abillity to communicate with others
naturalistic
sternberg
analytical intelligence
creative intelligence
practical intelligence
analytical intelligence
academic problem solving abilities (standardized tests)
creative intelligence
involve problem solving (microsoft quests)
practical intelligence
real life problem solving skills (multiple solutions)
situationally defined
social intelligence
the know-how involved in comprehending social situations and managing oneself successfully (aspergers)
emotional quotient
in relation to self and others (or situations)
perceive, manage, understand and use emotions
self awareness, enriching interactions, manage sever emotions, read emotional and social cues and overall more successful
creativity
ability to produce novel ideas
-divergent vs. convergent thinking
divergent vs convergent thinking
divergent: process of creating a list of items based on a single input
convergent: process of converting all of the general ideas into specific solutions that form an application
5 components of creativity
expertise
imaginative thinking skills
a venturesome personality
intrinsic motivation
a creative environment
intelligence tests
standardization
reliability
validity
inflation
normal curve
reliability
know what will happen-repeatable
validity
measuring what you should be measuring
inflation
scores are going up
standardization
defining meaninful scores by comparison with the performance of a pretested standardization group
concepts
mental grouping
prototypes
mental image or best fit we associate with a category
algorithms
step by step procedures to a guaranteed solution
heuristics
simple, quick and error ridden methods to solve problems
what makes us feel happy?
insight
confirmation bias
tendency to pay attention to info that supports our preconceptions and ignore that which does not
selective use of evidence
fixation
inability to see things from a fresh perspective
functional fixedness
also inability to see novel ways of doing thins (only go by what we know)
person place or thing has only one function
fixation on a problem/perspective
complete disregard of other info
representative heuristics
judgments made based on how well they fit our prototypes
what are preconceived emotions are
stereotypes
assumptions
availability heuristics
make quick decisions based on mentally available info
the faster something comes into your mind the more likely you are to believe its validity
-priming
.recently hearing, seeing
overconfidence
overestimating the accuracy of our knowledge or judgments
-watching game shows/reality tv
-downfall in war
framing
the way an issue or info is presented that might affect decisions and judgments
-1/5 or 20%
-clearance
belief perseverance
clinging to beliefs when disproved or discredited
-catholic miracles
-all used by marketers
-all these=conspiracy
priming
unconscious activiation of association and predisposition may influence memory, one's perception or response
intuition
immediate perceived insight without observation or reason
guidebooks on how to hone
has its place and accuracy
-gut instincts careful of hindsight
-non-verbal
attention phenomena
media's ability to direct our attention
fear what is immediate, what we cannot control, what is most recent in memory and what appears to pose the greatest personal risk
large numbers and dramatic instances capture our attention to provoke fear response or outary
fallacy
false thought
red haring
bandwagon
attack peson
loaded question
straw-man
causal
either/or
isplaced authority
hasty generalization
bandwagon
everybody's doin it..
misplaced authority
famous people put with product => authority
red haring
overwhelming amount of info to lead down certain path or mislead you
loaded question
word it to presume something...where are you going to grad school? don't even know if they are going
straw-man
built up with intent for you to destroy it
appeals to emotion
emotional rousing words
powerful visual images
shared belief
polar extremes
could lead to...
appropriate fear appeals: most likely to backfire
social psychology
how marketers utilize social psychology to hook you
assume the audience is an idiot
central processing
pay specific attention to the actual content
peripheral processing
gets you to remember product
-jingle, music
-most common
social influence
how we are influenced by psychological, conformity, comlpliance and our group behavior
norm of reciprocity
more willing to comply after receiving a favor
-like those who like us
-unsolicited gifts
-money in envelopes
door in the face
form of reciprocity
extreme request that is always rejected follolwed by original intent
before you give commitment they give you a better deal
social validation
using beliefs, attitutdes, and actions of others periodically, standard of comparison against which to evaluate the correctness of their own beliefs and attitudes
consistency with what others are doing
list technique
only asked to comply after shown a list of similar others who do
the longer the list the greater the effect (band wagon)
foot-in-the-door
consistency with personal beliefs
ask small request that will be accepted
then followup with a larger request
peole are more willing to comply with requests that are consistent with a perceived position/belief
bait and switch
works with consistency and commitment
-advertise to get the attention/commitment
-advertised product low quality/not in
-marsing was shown 2 houses...
low ball
obtain a commitment then change the deal
car dealers-give you a great low price
-the reason you decided to buy is removed
legitimiztion-of-party-favors
cognitive dissonance
-consistency with personal belief
-a request for something that person CAN give
-not giving in would be contrary to personal belief
-move up from there
physical attractiveness
promote products-do get more requests
talent, kindness, honesty, intelligence
lighter sentences in court
similarity
we like those who are similar to us
salesmen try to be like you
more likely to help those who dress like us
scarcity rule
opportunities seem more valuable when less available
psychological reactance
we want what we can't have (or shouldn't)
items difficult to possess are better than those that are easy
we love freedoms
censorship
4 most important:
scarcity
friendship, attractiveness
social validation
norm of reciprocity
-door in the face
attribution theory
situational attribution
dispositional attribution
situational attribution
actions based on situation
dispositional attribution
actions based on personality
fundamental attribution error
attribute attitude, actions to situation/environment
Thematic appreciation test
cards with images to attribute
pows and brainwashing
start with something small
-foot in the door
zimbardo pison study
randomly assign guards and inmates
supposed to last 2 wks-lasted 6 days
roles consumed personalities-Abu Ghrab all over
chamillion effect
unconsciously mymicing expressions, posture, voice, etc
adapt to group you are in
group pressure
real vs imagined
avoid rejection, social punishment, gain approval
greater conformity
when group of 3 or more
making people conform:
feeling incompetent/insecure
group of 3 or more
a unanimous group
group is of a higher status or more attractive
no prior commitment to a response
others observe the behavior
why do we conform?
normative social influence
informational social influence
when supporting what we believe/value
normative social influence
desire to gain approval
informational social influence
willingness to accept another's opinion of reality
kitty genovese
stabbed over 10 times in courtyard of apartment over 40 people were aware
latene darley
ambiguity
plualistic ignorance
-everyone goes along, nobody says otherwise
-everybody believes everyone believes
-no one believes
diffusion of responsibility
social validation
diffusion of responsibility and pluralistic ignorance
social facilitation
incrased resonse in the presence of others
-winding reels
-green lights
-competition=increase
-well learned/easy task=incrase response rate
-difficult task/learning=decrease response rate
social loafting
diffusion of responsiblity
-tendency to exert less effort when working in group
-tug-of-war and making noise
-man in individualistic cultures
-feel less accountability for actions
-view contribution as dispensible
deindividuation
abandoning normal restraints to the power of the group
occurs when people feel excited and anonymous
group polarization
tendency for a group of similar thinkers to enhance prevailing inclinations (possibly to the extreme)
racist students become more racist
suicide bombers
conspiracy groups
fanaticals
groupthink
desire to maintain harmony in the group
no dissenting ideas
overconfidence, conformity, polarization
obedience
milgram
-under what conditions are people obedient?
-authority figures
-production of less than 1% do it (psychopaths)
-65% obey to the end
-100% obey to 100 v