Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
22 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Hypothesis
|
Precise and testable statement that states explicitly what the researcher thinks will happen in the experiment/study
|
|
Null Hypothesis
(H1) |
States that there will be no affect
Eg: Gender does not affect how boys and girls play |
|
Alternative Hypothesis
|
States that any relationships between variables will be significcant. If results support this, the null hypothesis is rejected and the theory is supported
Eg: Boys play more violently than girls |
|
Operationalisation
|
The process of converting an idea into a precisely measured variable
|
|
One -tailed Hypothesis
|
Specifically predicts the direction of the effect that one variable has on another
Eg: Children who are female play less violently than those who are male |
|
Two tailed hypothesis
|
Less specific predictions about relations between variables. (eg, 'affect' or 'influence'
Eg. Gender affects the violence of play |
|
Constant error
|
Some variables have a constant affect on all p's (eg, how stuffy a room is)
|
|
Random Error
|
Variables that have a different effect on each individual (eg how a p feels)
|
|
Extraneous Variables
|
Variables/factors that may affect the experiment/p's or particular p
|
|
Independent Variable (IV:)
|
The variable that is manipulated
|
|
Dependent Variable (DV:)
|
Variable that is measured (dependent on the IV)
|
|
Control Condition
|
Normal occurrence. Baseline to compare future results to
|
|
Pilot Study
|
Small scale preliminary to:
1) Test the procedure for any faults 2) Find information about p's 3) Train researchers/experimenters |
|
Lab Experiment
|
Experiment that takes place in a highly controlled environment
|
|
Advantages of a lab experiment
|
- Highly controlled, reduces extraneous variables, increasing validity
- Easily replicable - high external validity - Ethical issues minimised, p's know that they're being studied - Allows detailed, objective measurement and recording - Can show cause and effect |
|
Disadvantages of a lab experiment
|
- Higher risk of demand characteristics - p's know they're studied
- Artificial environment, affects external validity - Low mundane realism, low ecological validity - Operationalisation of DV and IV may have poor validity - Greater risk of experimenter affects |
|
Field experiment
|
Takes place in a natural environment, where behavior would typically occur
|
|
Advantages of a field experiment
|
- Real life settings, p's behave more normally
- Higher mundane realism, higher ecological validity - IV and DV can be operationalised more successfully - higher validity - Unlikely experimenter effects - Can show cause and effect |
|
Disadvantages of a field experiment
|
- Lower level of control, extraneous variables are much harder to control
- Extraneous variables/practical difficulty means it's hard to accurately measure DV - Lower internal reliability - Accurate replications are hard - Ethical issues - p's may be unaware of involvement -More expensive and time consuming |
|
Natural Experiment
|
Different conditions of the IV already exist, researcher does not manipulate anything
|
|
Advantages of natural experiments
|
- Often only way to research something
-Allow researchers to investigate real problems that society faces |
|
Disadvantages of natural experiments
|
-Can't show cause and effect, IV's not manipulated
- Sometimes, p's have more in common than just the IV - Few aims that this is appropriate for - p's may be aware of study, demand characteristics - P's may be over-studied |