• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/22

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

22 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Hypothesis
Precise and testable statement that states explicitly what the researcher thinks will happen in the experiment/study
Null Hypothesis
(H1)
States that there will be no affect

Eg: Gender does not affect how boys and girls play
Alternative Hypothesis
States that any relationships between variables will be significcant. If results support this, the null hypothesis is rejected and the theory is supported

Eg: Boys play more violently than girls
Operationalisation
The process of converting an idea into a precisely measured variable
One -tailed Hypothesis
Specifically predicts the direction of the effect that one variable has on another

Eg: Children who are female play less violently than those who are male
Two tailed hypothesis
Less specific predictions about relations between variables. (eg, 'affect' or 'influence'

Eg. Gender affects the violence of play
Constant error
Some variables have a constant affect on all p's (eg, how stuffy a room is)
Random Error
Variables that have a different effect on each individual (eg how a p feels)
Extraneous Variables
Variables/factors that may affect the experiment/p's or particular p
Independent Variable (IV:)
The variable that is manipulated
Dependent Variable (DV:)
Variable that is measured (dependent on the IV)
Control Condition
Normal occurrence. Baseline to compare future results to
Pilot Study
Small scale preliminary to:
1) Test the procedure for any faults
2) Find information about p's
3) Train researchers/experimenters
Lab Experiment
Experiment that takes place in a highly controlled environment
Advantages of a lab experiment
- Highly controlled, reduces extraneous variables, increasing validity
- Easily replicable - high external validity
- Ethical issues minimised, p's know that they're being studied
- Allows detailed, objective measurement and recording
- Can show cause and effect
Disadvantages of a lab experiment
- Higher risk of demand characteristics - p's know they're studied
- Artificial environment, affects external validity
- Low mundane realism, low ecological validity
- Operationalisation of DV and IV may have poor validity
- Greater risk of experimenter affects
Field experiment
Takes place in a natural environment, where behavior would typically occur
Advantages of a field experiment
- Real life settings, p's behave more normally
- Higher mundane realism, higher ecological validity
- IV and DV can be operationalised more successfully - higher validity
- Unlikely experimenter effects
- Can show cause and effect
Disadvantages of a field experiment
- Lower level of control, extraneous variables are much harder to control
- Extraneous variables/practical difficulty means it's hard to accurately measure DV
- Lower internal reliability
- Accurate replications are hard
- Ethical issues - p's may be unaware of involvement
-More expensive and time consuming
Natural Experiment
Different conditions of the IV already exist, researcher does not manipulate anything
Advantages of natural experiments
- Often only way to research something
-Allow researchers to investigate real problems that society faces
Disadvantages of natural experiments
-Can't show cause and effect, IV's not manipulated
- Sometimes, p's have more in common than just the IV
- Few aims that this is appropriate for
- p's may be aware of study, demand characteristics
- P's may be over-studied