Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
47 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Persuasion
|
Process by which a message induces changes in beliefs, attitudes or behaviors.
|
|
Central Route
|
The more durable and more likely to influence behavior. Occurs when interested or motivated people focus on the arguments
|
|
Peripheral
|
Small cues such as looks used to persuade the listener.
|
|
Reciprocation
|
One would be more willing to comply with a request for someone who has previously provided a concession.
|
|
Commitment and Consistency
|
After committing oneself to an option, one should be more willing to comply with requests for behaviors that are consistent with that position. Ex. Foot in the door, Low-ball, door in the face
|
|
Social Validation/proof
|
Conformity. Ex. Jordan drinks gatorade, so should I. What is Oprah doing?
|
|
Friendship/liking
|
One is more likely to comply with requests form friends. Ex: Mary Kay, Avon, NNorwex, American Diabetics, tupperware parties
|
|
Physical Attractiveness
|
More persuasion in changing attitudes if the message giver is attractive. ex. Tom Brady to sell direct TV NFL NETWORK package.
|
|
Similiarity
|
If someone giving the message is similiar to you they have a better chance of persuading you. Ex. Wisconsin commercial.
|
|
Scarcity
|
Opportunities seem more valuable when less available. ex. LIMITED TIME OFFER
|
|
Sleeper Effect
|
Message more effective if seperated from source
|
|
Primacy Effect
|
Information presented first usually has the most influence
|
|
Recency Effect
|
Information presented last sometimes has more influence, more rare though
|
|
How to resist persuasion
|
Strengthen personal commitment
Challenge beliefs MILDLY develop counter arguments |
|
compliance
|
Outwardly going along with the group while inwardly disagreeeing.
|
|
Obedience
|
Compliance with a direct demand
|
|
Conformity
|
Changing one's behavior or belief as a result of group pressure.
|
|
Acceptance
|
Believing as well as acting in accord with social pressure
|
|
Autokinetic Phenomenon
|
The apparent movement of a stationary point of light in the dark. Performed by Sherif. Used to answer questions about peoples suggestibility. When participants were joined with other people their answers changed.
|
|
Light study
|
Sherifs Study
|
|
Asch Study
|
Line study
|
|
Milgrams study
|
Shock experiment.
65% conformed all the way |
|
What four factors breed obedience?
|
1.Victims emotional distance
2. Authority's closeness and legitimacy 3. Whether or not the authority was apart of a respected institution. 4. Liberating effects of a disobedient fellow participant |
|
Informational Influence
|
Occurs when people accept evidence about reality provided by other people.
Mostly used when: 1. Other information is not available 2. The situation is ambiguous 3. The situation is a crisis 4. Other people are experts. |
|
Normative Influence
|
Based on an individuals desire to fullfill others desires. Based on a need to be liked.
|
|
What predicts conformity?
|
Group Size (3-5). Unanimity. Status. Cohesion. Public response. Prior commitment.
|
|
Personality
|
Poor predictor of conformity, situational is better
|
|
New Social Role
|
Conforming to expectations is important when taking on a new social role
|
|
Cultural
|
Cultures that influence collectivism will have a higher rate of conformity than those that are individualistic. Bantu tribe of Zimbabwe were most socially responsive
|
|
Reactance
|
Motive to protect or restore one's sense of freedom.
|
|
Romeo and Juliet Effect
|
Couples that are forbidden are likely to go through
|
|
Group
|
Two or more people who interact and are interdependent in the sense that their needs and goals cause them to influence each other.
|
|
Triplet - Finishing line
|
Children did so faster when in the presence of other hcildren than when by themselves
|
|
Zajonc
|
Cross Species // Social Facilitation
|
|
Social Facilitation
|
Strengthening of dominant responses whether correct or incorrect in the presence of others.
|
|
Social Loafing
|
Tendency for people to exert less effort when they pool their efforts toward a common goal than when they are individually accountable.
|
|
Deindividualization
|
Loss of self-awareness and evaluation apprehension; occurs in group situationsn that foster responsiveness to group norms, good or bad.
|
|
Group Polarization
|
Group-produced enhancement of members’ preexisting tendencies
|
|
Risky Shift Phenomenon
|
When there is a consensus, someone will change their decision just to be different. Implications for juries, businesses etc.
|
|
Pluralistic Ignorance
|
False impression of what others are thinking
|
|
Normative Influence
|
Social Comparison
|
|
Informational influence
|
We use others for knowledge
|
|
Groupthink
|
Mode of thinking that persons engage in when concurrence-seeking becomes so dominant in a cohesive in-group that it tends to override realistic appraisal of alternative courses of action
EXAMPLE: Challenger Shuttle |
|
Groupthink caused by:
|
1. Highly Cohesive group
2. Isolation of the group from opposing viewpoints 3. Directive Leader |
|
Symptoms of Group Think
|
An illusion of invulnerability
Unquestioned belief in the groups morality Rationalization Stereotyped view of opponent Conformity pressure Self-censorship Illusion of unanimity Mindgaurds |
|
Minority Influence
|
Consistency, self-confidence, defections from the majority,
|
|
How to avoid groupthink
|
Remain Impartial
Seek outside opinions Create subgroups Seek annonymous opinions |