• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/63

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

63 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

general description of language

ability to convey an infinite number of novel concepts

4 components of language

phonology, semantics, grammar, pragmatics

phonological development

learning about the sound system of a languages (phonemes)

semantic development

learning about expressing meaning (morphemes)

syntactic development (grammar)

learning the rules for combining soundséwords (syntax, grammar)

pragmatic development

learning how language is used (metalinguistic knowledge)

language ____ precedes _____

comprehension, production

4.5 months

recognize own name

6 months

when hear mommy or daddy look at right person

12-14 months

listen longer to sentences with normal word order than scrambled order

13-15 months

appreciate that word combos carry meaning beyond the individual words

language development, cooing stage, 6-8 weeks

produce simple speech sounds, and vocal gymnastics


improved motor control of vocalizations


imitate sounds of their parents, high pitched for mom and lower for dad


will imitate speech sounds they hear from a tape

babbling stage, 6-10 months

prodice vocal consonant syllables in rpetition


babble only a limited set of sounds, some not in their native language


gradually it takes on the sounds, rhythms and intonation patterns of the language they hear around them


adults can pick out the babbling of an infant from their own language from infants in other languages


deaf infants exposed to sign language manually babble

holophrastic period, 10-15 months

one-word utterances that express a whole phrase


first words include mostly nouns, frequent events or routines, some modifiers


overextentions sometimes occur, ex. dog for all animals, probably due to their limited vocabulary rather than a lack of knowledge

telegraphic speech end of 2nd year~ 24 months

begin to combine words in simple sentences


often 2 word utterances


gradually child begins to add first person pronouns, ver endings, plurals then functions words (if the a...)


practice on their own "crib talk"


evidence for internalized grammatical rules:


- consistent word order, never "cookie eat"


- overregularizstion errors (goed, foots, mans)


- application of rules to novel words (the wug test)

The Wug test

shows that children can apply the rules of their language even to nonsense words

recovering facts vs recovering words

facts = slow and hard


words - fast and effortless

the word segmentation problem

pauses marking word boundaries, infants pick up on statistical regularities (eg. co-occurences)

the quinean reference problem

does it refer to something, if so, what does it refer to?

behaviourist/ associative learning account

parents label objects for the child


child begins to associaate the word it hears with the object it sees at the time the word is uttered


parent's give positive or negative reinforcement or feedback

arguments against behaviourist/ associative accounts

30% of the time a word is uttered the object it refers to isn't present


when parents do label things it is mostly nouns


they have to learn abstract terms and non nouns with no word world mapping


parents rarely give feedback, and its often ineffective


children learn language in cultures where parents don't speak to them

solving the reference problem

whole object bias


basic level bia


shape and function biases


linguistic context (grammatical structure of sentence)
syntactic bootstrapping


mutual exclusive bias


theory of mind and pragmatics

whole object bias

when a child learns a new word they must decide whether the word refers to the whole object, part of it, its substance, colour, texture etc


because of this bias children often assume you are talking about the whole object

basic level bias

they learn basic level (eg. dog) before subordinate (poodle, hound...) or superordinate (pet, mammal, animal)


bias towards the simple

shape bias

tendency of infants to generalize info about an object from its shape rather than its colour, material, or texture when learning nouns

functional bias

shape is a good cue for function, when shape and function are pitted against each other function usually wins out


ex. different shaped chairs, still chairs

linguistic context

the meaning changes depending on the context

syntactic bootstrapping

a theory that proposes that verbs, presented in their syntactic frames, provide a source of information about their meaning


"blank is hugging bob"


know that blank is doing the hugging, not bob

mutual exclusive bias, lexical contrast

the assumption that only one label can be applied to each object in early word learning,

theory of mind and pragmatics

joint attention - eye gaze and intention reading


selctive social learning


- eg, deciding who is most knowledgeable source


tomasello's bucket study


an intention reading explanation of mutual exclusivity

other cues that can help children learn language

scaffolding, prosody, infant directed speech (IDS)



scaffolding

conversation and narrative schemes


providing contectual supports for meaning through the use of simpified language, teacher modeling, visuals and graphics, cooperative learning and hands on learning

prosody

the characteristic rhythm, tempo, cadence, melody, intonation pattern, stress, etc with which language is spoken

infant directed speech ids

characteristics: emotional tone, slow and clear, exaggerated speech, exaggerated facial expressions


infants like ids better than regular speech


infants learn more words in ids


ids is not universal but very common

theories of social development

learning theories (behaviorist learning theories, social LT), social cognition theories, ecological and evolutionary theories (ethology/ evolutionary psych theories, bioecological theories)

behaviorist LT

emphasize the role of external factors in shaping personality and social behavior


- reinforcement/ punishment (operant conditioning)


- associations (classical conditioning)

what type of reinforcement is harder to extinguish?

intermittently reinforced behavior

tools parents can use to alter behavior include (behavioural LT)

systematic desensitization - based on associations


behavioural modification - based on reward/ punishment

social LT

emphasizes observation and imitation rather than purely reinforcement


preschoolers can aquire behaviours through observing others


learning can be influenced by vicarious reinforcement, ie whether the person whose actions they obsered was rewarded or punished


social learning can be selective, who is the best person to learn from etc

bandura bobo doll experient

aggressive modeling, children who watch adult abuse a doll are more likely to do the same as well as more likely to be attracted to guns even if not modelled

theories of social cognition

emphasizes how children think about their own and others thoughts, feelings, motives, intentions, expectations, and behaviours


focus on internal/cognitive factors more than external factors


ex. dodge info-processing theory


- emphasizes cognitive processes (such as interpretation) ex. hostile attribution bias, self-fulfilling prophecies

Dweck's theory of self-attributions and achievement motivation

emphasizes the role of self attributions




entity/ helpless/ fixed orientation attribute




incremental/ mastery/ growth orientation attribute

entity/ helpless/ fixed orientation attribute

children with an entity/ helpless/ fixed orientation attribute success/ failure to enduring aspects of the self and tend to give up in the face of failure - helpless children tend to base their self worth on approval from others- to be assured of praise, they avoid situations in which they are likely to not be successful

incremental/ mastery/ growth orientation

children with an incremental/ mastery/ growth orientation attribute success/ failure to the amount of effort expended and persist in the face of failure

how can parents help

praising kids for working hard = supports incremental orientation




avoid only praising enduring traits = leads to entitiy view

ethological and evolutionary models

just as evolution influenced our physical traits it no doubt influenced our behavioural traits


certain genes predispose individuals to behave in a way that increases surival, mating and reproduction, these genes are passed on


focus on the adaptive or survival vale of behavior and their evolutionary and biological origins

evolutionary psych, parental investment theory

stresses the evolutionary basis of many aspects of parental behaviour, including the extensive investment parents make in their offspring


parents genes are perpetuated only if their offspring reproduce


a dark side: the rate of murders committed by stepfathers against children residing with them is hundreds of times higher than the rate for fathers and their biological children

the bioecological model

urie Brofenbrenner presents the child's envirmonment as a series of nested levels, with every level having an impact on development



the bioecological model nested levels

microsystem: the immediate, bi-directional environment that a person experiences


mesosystem: encompasses the connections among various microsystems


exosystem: the larger cultural context withing which the other systems are embedded


chronosystem: consists of historical changes that influence the other systems

gender similarities hypothesis

most average gender differencs in cognitive abilities are in the small range


similarities far outweigh differences on most attributes

documented psychological differences between genders

verbal: girls earlier, maintain adv


visual/ spatial: males slightly better


mathematical: adolescence on, males sml adv


aggression: from early life, males more aggressive


activity level: boys more physically active


fearm timidity, risk taking: boys less fearful, more risk taking,


emotional expressivity: females more


compliance: females more


developmental vulnerability: boys more

gender and behaviourist LT

emphasis on nurture/ learning


emphasis on reinforcement


- eg. parents or peers reward 'gender-appropriate' behaviours


- reward need not be physical eg. social attention


classical and operant conditioning

gender and social LT

children learn about gender through observations of others (parents, peers, media) and direct teaching


observational learning


- observing their own gender


~because of gender segregation, they witness same sex activities more


~children see and experience the roles of men and woman in society, resulting in gender-typed activities


~attend more to, and remember better, info about same sex activities/toys

direct teaching

parents do:


buy gender appropriate toys, are supportive of sex appropriate play, talk differently to children




parents dont:
display a difference in warmth, differ in # of interactions or responsiveness, restrict # of activities

gender schema theory (social cognition)

children develop gender schemas: mental representations incorporating everything they know (or believe) about gender




schemas lead to a confirmation bias (a bias to attend to or remember info that fits with or confirms that schema and distort or forget disconfirming info)




gender self-socialization - the child determines what other info they learn about gender, perpetuating cycle




self-fulfilling prophecies - stereotype threat

gender and ecological models

bioecological model:


children learn and are influenced by gender at every level (all systems)


ex. room they love, occupations/ genders of neighbors, media, belief systems of the culture, time period

gender and evolutionary models

gender behav are genetically based to influence survival and mating


ex. physical activity, aggression in males due to 'hunter' characteristics, need to compete for mates


ex. nurturance and emotional characteristic in females, playing with dolls is the caregiver in females

gender and evolutionary models: Parental investment theory

differences in relationships and roles fue to different investment needs of males vs. females in offspring


ex. males can have large number of offspring, females limited number and larger time commitment


ex. males emphasize attractiveness of mates, females emphasize stability/ resources

biological explanation

female rats and rhesus macaques treated with testosterone showed increase activity level, rough and tumble play, and aggression




sensitive periods are different for different sex-type behaviour


~8 weeks gestation - 6 months of age




gender is a continuous variable (biologically)

hormones during pregnancy

in humans, when androgen is reduced...


prefrence for mor feminine clothing, less tomboyish behaviour, score lower on spaital ability




when androgen is increased...


males: enter puberty earlier


females: ambiguous genitatlia, more "masculine" physical traits, gender identity issues, more time with male toys a playmates, better spatial skills

integrating theories

hormones and biological differences influence gender identity and play styles




play styles being more compatible leads to gender segregation




gender segragation leads to greater opportunities to learn about gender typed behaviour and form gender schemas




others beliefs get incorporated ex. peers, adults, media




all are influenced by cultural beliefs, time period, etc.

brain structure and functioning

male and female brains show some small differences in physical structure




- the corpus callosum, the nerve bundle connecting the hemispheres, tends to be large and more dense in woman than in men


- whe engaged in cognitive tasks, make brains tend to show more unilateral activation whereas female brains show more bilateral activation

done

done